Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-16-2016, 04:15 PM   #141
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Forgot about Nylander's previous AHL season... not sure what to think now.
Could "pro seasons" mean 40 games played like it does when it comes to UFA status?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2016, 04:18 PM   #142
Dan403
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonInBothHands View Post
Yes.
No.

The team that lost a player then gets to protect three more players.
Dan403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dan403 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2016, 04:19 PM   #143
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
Could "pro seasons" mean 40 games played like it does when it comes to UFA status?
Well Nylander won't get 40 games this season.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 04:22 PM   #144
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Well Nylander won't get 40 games this season.
He has 40 pro games. Just trying to figure out why Nylander would be considered in his first year and that's the only thing that makes sense.

I guess not exactly the same as how it works for UFA status, because that only counts NHL games. But the number could be the same.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 04:26 PM   #145
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Loading the team up with prospects on entry-level deals will not be an option for an expansion team because they have to make the salary floor. (Unless they don't have to).
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 04:26 PM   #146
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
Well yeah but the new expansion team would have to be pretty dumb to pick pending UFAs when there will be better Flames left unprotected.
Yeah... but for the purposes of reaching the 25% payroll threshold it's important.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2016, 04:33 PM   #147
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
But if Nylander is considered a 1st year pro when he is about to finish his 2nd year in the AHL, then Kylington's 1st year pro would be next season.

Wouldn't he be protected under this definition?
Nylander will burn an ELC year if he plays tommorow. I think that's what makes him a first year "pro" Otherwise next year would be his first year pro whether he plays AHL or NHL.

Last edited by GranteedEV; 03-16-2016 at 04:35 PM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 04:35 PM   #148
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Kypreos on TV is saying Toronto has a better chance of getting an expansion team than QC. They'd play out of the Air Canada Centre for a few years.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 04:40 PM   #149
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

So, if I am understanding this correctly, players like William Nylander and Oliver Kylington would be considered 3rd year in 2017-18, even though they were playing in a pro league before and after their draft years? Strictly going by the leagues Kylington has been playing in, this is actually his 4th year 'pro'.

I am assuming that the years prior to the draft aren't counted, correct?
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 04:43 PM   #150
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
So, if I am understanding this correctly, players like William Nylander and Oliver Kylington would be considered 3rd year in 2017-18, even though they were playing in a pro league before and after their draft years? Strictly going by the leagues Kylington has been playing in, this is actually his 4th year 'pro'.

I am assuming that the years prior to the draft aren't counted, correct?
Interesting. If "pro" means before the draft as well, wouldn't Matthews/Finns finish their second year next year?
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 05:01 PM   #151
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
So, if I am understanding this correctly, players like William Nylander and Oliver Kylington would be considered 3rd year in 2017-18, even though they were playing in a pro league before and after their draft years? Strictly going by the leagues Kylington has been playing in, this is actually his 4th year 'pro'.

I am assuming that the years prior to the draft aren't counted, correct?
This is Nylander's second pro season while Kylington is in his first.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 05:24 PM   #152
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
This is Nylander's second pro season while Kylington is in his first.
Depends on whether or not they count time in European Elite leagues. Otherwise, this would already by Nylander's third.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 05:33 PM   #153
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
Kypreos on TV is saying Toronto has a better chance of getting an expansion team than QC. They'd play out of the Air Canada Centre for a few years.
I'm pretty sure the Leafs would start intimidating any potential owner, if there was one.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 06:03 PM   #154
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

I'm pretty sure MLSE would charge a totally fair, not exploitative rent on the ACC during that time.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2016, 06:39 PM   #155
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
I'm pretty sure MLSE would charge a totally fair, not exploitative rent on the ACC during that time.
I'm thinking a parting of ways between Rogers and Bell with one getting the expansion team. In such an arrangement, I'm sure it would be worked out to each parties interests. What happens to the Raptors, Toronto FC, the Argos and their holdings would be interesting as well.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2016, 06:45 PM   #156
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
So, if I am understanding this correctly, players like William Nylander and Oliver Kylington would be considered 3rd year in 2017-18, even though they were playing in a pro league before and after their draft years? Strictly going by the leagues Kylington has been playing in, this is actually his 4th year 'pro'.

I am assuming that the years prior to the draft aren't counted, correct?
Earlier in the thread, I posted the definition of a "Professional Season" from the CBA. More than likely, this is what the league will use to determine a player's pro status for the expansion draft...

PROFESSIONAL SEASON:
Quote:
The term "professional season" shall: (A) for a Player aged 18 or 19, mean any season in which such Player plays in eleven (11) or more Professional Games (including NHL Regular Season and Playoff Games, minor league regular season and playoff games, and games played in any European professional league, while under an SPC), and (B) for a Player aged 20 or older, mean any season in which such Player plays in one or more Professional Games (including NHL Regular Season and Playoff Games, minor league regular season and playoff games, and games played in any European professional league, while under an SPC).

Using that definition, any seasons played as pros in Europe before the player signed his ELC won't count as pro years. Any seasons played in a pro league (Europe, AHL/ECHL, NHL) after signing their ELCs will count.

If that's the definition they use, last season would have been considered Nylander's first pro year; this year is Kylington's; and next year's will be Matthews'.

Another interesting case is a guy like Adam Ollas Mattsson, who has played two years of pro hockey in Sweden since he was drafted, but he has not yet signed his first NHL contract. If he signs with the Flames and comes over next year, that will be considered his first pro season under the NHL CBA.


It wouldn't make any sense for the NHL to use a different definition for a professional season than what is written in the CBA. Of course, the NHL does a lot of things that don't make any sense...so, who knows?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2016, 07:04 PM   #157
Walter Reed
First Line Centre
 
Walter Reed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Beautiful Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
But if Nylander is considered a 1st year pro when he is about to finish his 2nd year in the AHL, then Kylington's 1st year pro would be next season.

Wouldn't he be protected under this definition?
As I understand it, yes he would need to be protected.
__________________
"Half the general managers in the NHL would would trade their rosters for our roster right now ......... I think I know a little about winning ..." - Kevin Lowe; April 2013


IKTHUS
Walter Reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 07:37 PM   #158
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbylouie View Post
One problem I see with all this is that a team with 4 defenseman that they want to protect will still opt for the 3-7 split and just list the 4th defenseman as a forward......then claim "says who?" when the league says he's a defenseman. This might sound farfetched at first, but really, it's not like a position is part of somebody's birthright and who really is to say. Plenty of players have switched positions in their career, even within a game. Anybody who's been around long enough to remember previous expansion drafts knows that teams have tried to get away with far worse (the Bernie Wolfe fiasco ring a bell?).
That is a somewhat interesting question...do Burns and Byfuglien revert to F for their last few games or something? This is the league that elected Ovechkin to All-NHL teams at both LW and RW, right?


The 25% thing seems to reward teams with bad contracts and punish teams w/o. Much like the amnesty buyout thing, where I think there should have been at least some sort of punishment (e.g. based on size of contract; 5M+ = give up 3rd round pick, 3M+ = 4th, 2M = 5th, etc.), but of course that ship has sailed.


In a 1 team expansion draft, is there any relevance to the order in the teams the players are picked from? I can't think of a good reason, as the new team is going to have figured out their entire roster...it would seem that perhaps it should happen a few days before the draft to give teams more time to adjust their plans.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 08:24 PM   #159
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
So

Brodie
Hamilton
Giordano

Gaudreau
Monahan
Bennett
Backlund
Frolik
Poirier
Shinkaruk

Gillies
Poirier and Shinkaruk need to do a lot over the next 2 years to get to the level that Ferland has reached.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2016, 08:40 PM   #160
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

How does expansion work as it relates to their minor league affiliate networks?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy