03-16-2016, 04:15 PM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Forgot about Nylander's previous AHL season... not sure what to think now.
|
Could "pro seasons" mean 40 games played like it does when it comes to UFA status?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:18 PM
|
#142
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonInBothHands
Yes.
|
No.
The team that lost a player then gets to protect three more players.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dan403 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:19 PM
|
#143
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Could "pro seasons" mean 40 games played like it does when it comes to UFA status?
|
Well Nylander won't get 40 games this season.
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:22 PM
|
#144
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Well Nylander won't get 40 games this season.
|
He has 40 pro games. Just trying to figure out why Nylander would be considered in his first year and that's the only thing that makes sense.
I guess not exactly the same as how it works for UFA status, because that only counts NHL games. But the number could be the same.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:26 PM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
|
Loading the team up with prospects on entry-level deals will not be an option for an expansion team because they have to make the salary floor. (Unless they don't have to).
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:26 PM
|
#146
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Well yeah but the new expansion team would have to be pretty dumb to pick pending UFAs when there will be better Flames left unprotected.
|
Yeah... but for the purposes of reaching the 25% payroll threshold it's important.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:33 PM
|
#147
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
But if Nylander is considered a 1st year pro when he is about to finish his 2nd year in the AHL, then Kylington's 1st year pro would be next season.
Wouldn't he be protected under this definition?
|
Nylander will burn an ELC year if he plays tommorow. I think that's what makes him a first year "pro" Otherwise next year would be his first year pro whether he plays AHL or NHL.
Last edited by GranteedEV; 03-16-2016 at 04:35 PM.
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:35 PM
|
#148
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Kypreos on TV is saying Toronto has a better chance of getting an expansion team than QC. They'd play out of the Air Canada Centre for a few years.
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:40 PM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
|
So, if I am understanding this correctly, players like William Nylander and Oliver Kylington would be considered 3rd year in 2017-18, even though they were playing in a pro league before and after their draft years? Strictly going by the leagues Kylington has been playing in, this is actually his 4th year 'pro'.
I am assuming that the years prior to the draft aren't counted, correct?
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 04:43 PM
|
#150
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
So, if I am understanding this correctly, players like William Nylander and Oliver Kylington would be considered 3rd year in 2017-18, even though they were playing in a pro league before and after their draft years? Strictly going by the leagues Kylington has been playing in, this is actually his 4th year 'pro'.
I am assuming that the years prior to the draft aren't counted, correct?
|
Interesting. If "pro" means before the draft as well, wouldn't Matthews/Finns finish their second year next year?
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 05:01 PM
|
#151
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
So, if I am understanding this correctly, players like William Nylander and Oliver Kylington would be considered 3rd year in 2017-18, even though they were playing in a pro league before and after their draft years? Strictly going by the leagues Kylington has been playing in, this is actually his 4th year 'pro'.
I am assuming that the years prior to the draft aren't counted, correct?
|
This is Nylander's second pro season while Kylington is in his first.
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 05:24 PM
|
#152
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan
This is Nylander's second pro season while Kylington is in his first.
|
Depends on whether or not they count time in European Elite leagues. Otherwise, this would already by Nylander's third.
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 05:33 PM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan
Kypreos on TV is saying Toronto has a better chance of getting an expansion team than QC. They'd play out of the Air Canada Centre for a few years.
|
I'm pretty sure the Leafs would start intimidating any potential owner, if there was one.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 06:03 PM
|
#154
|
In the Sin Bin
|
I'm pretty sure MLSE would charge a totally fair, not exploitative rent on the ACC during that time.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-16-2016, 06:39 PM
|
#155
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
I'm pretty sure MLSE would charge a totally fair, not exploitative rent on the ACC during that time.
|
I'm thinking a parting of ways between Rogers and Bell with one getting the expansion team. In such an arrangement, I'm sure it would be worked out to each parties interests. What happens to the Raptors, Toronto FC, the Argos and their holdings would be interesting as well.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-16-2016, 06:45 PM
|
#156
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
So, if I am understanding this correctly, players like William Nylander and Oliver Kylington would be considered 3rd year in 2017-18, even though they were playing in a pro league before and after their draft years? Strictly going by the leagues Kylington has been playing in, this is actually his 4th year 'pro'.
I am assuming that the years prior to the draft aren't counted, correct?
|
Earlier in the thread, I posted the definition of a "Professional Season" from the CBA. More than likely, this is what the league will use to determine a player's pro status for the expansion draft...
PROFESSIONAL SEASON:
Quote:
The term "professional season" shall: (A) for a Player aged 18 or 19, mean any season in which such Player plays in eleven (11) or more Professional Games (including NHL Regular Season and Playoff Games, minor league regular season and playoff games, and games played in any European professional league, while under an SPC), and (B) for a Player aged 20 or older, mean any season in which such Player plays in one or more Professional Games (including NHL Regular Season and Playoff Games, minor league regular season and playoff games, and games played in any European professional league, while under an SPC).
|
Using that definition, any seasons played as pros in Europe before the player signed his ELC won't count as pro years. Any seasons played in a pro league (Europe, AHL/ECHL, NHL) after signing their ELCs will count.
If that's the definition they use, last season would have been considered Nylander's first pro year; this year is Kylington's; and next year's will be Matthews'.
Another interesting case is a guy like Adam Ollas Mattsson, who has played two years of pro hockey in Sweden since he was drafted, but he has not yet signed his first NHL contract. If he signs with the Flames and comes over next year, that will be considered his first pro season under the NHL CBA.
It wouldn't make any sense for the NHL to use a different definition for a professional season than what is written in the CBA. Of course, the NHL does a lot of things that don't make any sense...so, who knows?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-16-2016, 07:04 PM
|
#157
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Beautiful Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
But if Nylander is considered a 1st year pro when he is about to finish his 2nd year in the AHL, then Kylington's 1st year pro would be next season.
Wouldn't he be protected under this definition?
|
As I understand it, yes he would need to be protected.
__________________
"Half the general managers in the NHL would would trade their rosters for our roster right now ......... I think I know a little about winning ..." - Kevin Lowe; April 2013
IKTHUS
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 07:37 PM
|
#158
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbylouie
One problem I see with all this is that a team with 4 defenseman that they want to protect will still opt for the 3-7 split and just list the 4th defenseman as a forward......then claim "says who?" when the league says he's a defenseman. This might sound farfetched at first, but really, it's not like a position is part of somebody's birthright and who really is to say. Plenty of players have switched positions in their career, even within a game. Anybody who's been around long enough to remember previous expansion drafts knows that teams have tried to get away with far worse (the Bernie Wolfe fiasco ring a bell?).
|
That is a somewhat interesting question...do Burns and Byfuglien revert to F for their last few games or something? This is the league that elected Ovechkin to All-NHL teams at both LW and RW, right?
The 25% thing seems to reward teams with bad contracts and punish teams w/o. Much like the amnesty buyout thing, where I think there should have been at least some sort of punishment (e.g. based on size of contract; 5M+ = give up 3rd round pick, 3M+ = 4th, 2M = 5th, etc.), but of course that ship has sailed.
In a 1 team expansion draft, is there any relevance to the order in the teams the players are picked from? I can't think of a good reason, as the new team is going to have figured out their entire roster...it would seem that perhaps it should happen a few days before the draft to give teams more time to adjust their plans.
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 08:24 PM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
So
Brodie
Hamilton
Giordano
Gaudreau
Monahan
Bennett
Backlund
Frolik
Poirier
Shinkaruk
Gillies
|
Poirier and Shinkaruk need to do a lot over the next 2 years to get to the level that Ferland has reached.
|
|
|
03-16-2016, 08:40 PM
|
#160
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
How does expansion work as it relates to their minor league affiliate networks?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM.
|
|