03-08-2016, 04:47 PM
|
#1
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Flames record down the stretch
16 games left. Mixed bag schedule with a lot of non-playoff teams (ARIx2, TOR, EDM, VAN, WPG, MTL) a few top teams (ANA, LAK, STL, CHI) and a few playoff wildcard teams in MINx2 and NSH.
What's our record down the stretch?
According to sportsclubstats.com, here are some interesting percentages relating our record with our position in the final standings.
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/W...c/Calgary.html (scroll to bottom)
7-7-2: 23% of 5th last, 39% chance of 4th last, 26% of 3rd last, 5% of 2nd last
6-8-2: 21% chance of 4th last, 44% chance of 3rd last, 28% of 2nd last, 3% of last
5-9-2: 26% chance of 3rd last, 52% chance of 2nd last, 18% chance of last
I'm skeptical we could go .500. How far under .500 do we end up?
The games against ARIx2, TOR, EDM, VAN, and WPG will be key in the Tank Wars. I'm guessing we start Backstrom/Hiller in a few of them
Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 03-08-2016 at 10:28 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 06:05 PM
|
#2
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I'll be cheering for 0-16.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Canehdianman For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 06:16 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canehdianman
I'll be cheering for 0-16.
|
2-14 please.
Losing against Edmonton and Vancouver is unacceptable.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
|
badger89,
bc-chris,
bubbsy,
Dan02,
DaQwiz,
davidus_49,
FiveSeven,
flamesforcup,
GranteedEV,
GreenHardHat,
I-Hate-Hulse,
Itse,
I_H8_Crawford,
Loudog,
Phaneufenstein,
smiggy77,
Zoller
|
03-08-2016, 07:13 PM
|
#4
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYC
|
Nashville- L
Arizona- OTL
St.Louis- L
Winnipeg- W
Colorado- W
@Montreal- OTL
@Toronto- L
@Minnesota- L
Chicago- L
@Arizona- W
@Anahiem- WIN! The Flames will break the curse and I am not jinxing this! Book it!
@Los Angeles- L
@Edmonton- OTL
Los Angeles- L
Vancouver- L
Minnesota- L
4-9-3 putting the Flames in 2nd last
__________________
|
|
|
03-08-2016, 07:52 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
I absolutely have no cares as to what the record is down the stretch. Just don't embarrass yourself out there and compete hard every night. Start building good habits for next year. It's never too early to start playing the right way.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
|
BigBCalgary,
Calgary4LIfe,
Captaincanada80,
DaQwiz,
dying4acup,
Enoch Root,
Fire of the Phoenix,
Flames Draft Watcher,
GreenHardHat,
heep223,
Hockey-and_stuff,
Loudog,
Mister Yamoto,
MoBiBu,
Phaneufenstein,
powderjunkie,
Split98,
Vinny01,
wired,
wireframe
|
03-08-2016, 08:40 PM
|
#6
|
Franchise Player
|
I don't want us to out suck Edmonton or Toronto for an extra 8.5% chance at Matthews. That would be a sign that our culture is as bad as theirs and that this team is further away from contending than we think, and that last year was the exception. Let the hockey gods reward us for doing it the right way.
Sure, the incremental increase in odds to end up with a higher pick are nice, but I'd be happy if we finish higher than Winnipeg.
I will cheer for the Flames to play well first (especially the young players) and win second, but I will be less disappointed if only the first happens.
|
|
|
03-08-2016, 08:48 PM
|
#7
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
In an ideal world, we finish 16-0. Losing sucks, and tanking is worse. What kind of person cheers for their team to lose?
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 08:54 PM
|
#8
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
Sure, the incremental increase in odds to end up with a higher pick are nice, but I'd be happy if we finish higher than Winnipeg.
|
The increased odds are nice but I think the biggest benefit from a lower position is that you can only move down 3 spots total so finishing lower improves the worst possible outcome and average outcome.
http://www.tankathon.com/nhl/pick_odds
If we finish 5th last, drafting 8th overall is the worst case scenario, drafting 6th overall the most likely scenario.
If we finish 4th last, drafting 7th overall is the worst case scenario, drafting 6th overall the most likely scenario.
If we finish 3rd last, drafting 6th overall is the worst case scenario, drafting 5th overall the most likely scenario.
If we finish 2nd last, drafting 5th overall is the worst case scenario, drafting 4th overall the most likely scenario.
If we finish last drafting 4th overall is the worst case and most likely scenario.
The slightly improved odds at a top 3 are nice but the best benefit of finishing lower in this new system is capping where your pick could fall to if you don't win the lottery and improving your most likely pick position. Even if we don't win the lottery I think its a heck of a lot sweeter if we draft #4 or #5 than if we were picking #6 or #7. Finishing bottom 3 in the standings would nearly ensure the Flames a top 5 pick.
Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 03-08-2016 at 09:00 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:03 PM
|
#9
|
Voted for Kodos
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thescorpion
in an ideal world, we finish 16-0. Losing sucks, and tanking is worse. What kind of person cheers for their team to lose?
|
32-0.
|
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:11 PM
|
#10
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Southern Sweden
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
In an ideal world, we finish 16-0. Losing sucks, and tanking is worse. What kind of person cheers for their team to lose?
|
Get off your high horse buddy. It's the NHL's fault for promoting it, not the fans for playing along.
|
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:15 PM
|
#11
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed
32-0.
|
Wut? The Flames have 16 games left. Unless you're talking about points.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cofias
Get off your high horse buddy. It's the NHL's fault for promoting it, not the fans for playing along.
|
How exactly does the NHL promote tanking?
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE
|
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:17 PM
|
#12
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
In an ideal world, we finish 16-0. Losing sucks, and tanking is worse. What kind of person cheers for their team to lose?
|
I've seen a lot of wins and a lot more losses in my 20 years of watching the Flames. If a few more losses help get us a top 3-5 pick this year I can certainly stomach them. I'm not cheering for them to lose and I want to see the team give the best effort they can at all times. But a few close losses may help us long term despite the short term pain. Imagine we had won a couple more games in Sam Bennett's year and were choosing from Dal Colle, Virtanen, Ritchie, and Nylander instead? Ick. I think the franchise is better off from us getting lucky there and finishing 4th and landing Sam Bennett. The losses have slightly diminished value because of the new system leaving more up to the lottery. But it still affects where our pick can fall to. In a year where the top 3-5 look great and then there's a drop off you don't really wanna end up drafting 6-7th. It's fine but not ideal.
I'm not cheering for them to lose. But if you realistically assess this team they have rookie goaltending with questionable backups, weak scoring depth and are short a top 4 d-man. Realistically I doubt they will go .500 and it has nothing to do with cheering for them to win or lose. I can happily cheer them on and be encouraged by all the good things they do while still seeing the silver lining in the losses. I think that is a fair and reasonable way to approach the end of a lost season and that's the way I'm approaching it.
Is 6-8-2 a reasonable record to expect? If it is then we'll likely finish somewhere between 2nd and 4th last and likely end up with a top 5 pick.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:17 PM
|
#13
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
I'd take a 16-0 finish with us winning the lottery with 1% odds!
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:18 PM
|
#14
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I've seen a lot of wins and a lot more losses in my 20 years of watching the Flames. If a few more losses help get us a top 3-5 pick this year I can certainly stomach them. I'm not cheering for them to lose and I want to see the team give the best effort they can at all times. But a few close losses may help us long term despite the short term pain. Imagine we had won a couple more games in Sam Bennett's year and were choosing from Dal Colle, Virtanen, Ritchie, and Nylander instead? Ick. I think the franchise is better off from us getting lucky there and finishing 4th and landing Sam Bennett. The losses have slightly diminished value because of the new system leaving more up to the lottery. But it still affects where our pick can fall to. In a year where the top 3-5 look great and then there's a drop off you don't really wanna end up drafting 6-7th. It's fine but not ideal.
I'm not cheering for them to lose. But if you realistically assess this team they have rookie goaltending with questionable backups, weak scoring depth and are short a top 4 d-man. Realistically I doubt they will go .500 and it has nothing to do with cheering for them to win or lose. I can happily cheer them on and be encouraged by all the good things they do while still seeing the silver lining in the losses. I think that is a fair and reasonable way to approach the end of a lost season and that's the way I'm approaching it.
Is 6-8-2 a reasonable record to expect? If it is then we'll likely finish somewhere between 2nd and 4th last and likely end up with a top 5 pick.
|
Those are some good points. I'm not angry at losses. In fact, I'm pretty indifferent to them. However, I do not understand people who cheer them.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:21 PM
|
#15
|
Voted for Kodos
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Wut? The Flames have 16 games left. Unless you're talking about points.
|
If the Flames go 16-0 to end the season, there might be more games after that.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:21 PM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
|
I'm just cheering for the Flames to play good hockey, and for the most part they have been, even during this recent rough stretch.
I'm not cheering for losses, but that game against San Jose was awesome. They played absolutely fantastic and had the other teams goalie steal the game from them.
Normally I would be pissed off big time about that, but given the circumstances this season I'm ok with it.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 09:29 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
I don't like watching the Flames lose. I think they go 9-7. Hopefully they beat STL next Monday because I am going to the game.
|
|
|
03-08-2016, 10:19 PM
|
#18
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Important Reverse Standings Games For Wed, March 9
CGY vs NSH
-NSH is freaking hot right now, Johansen seems to be fitting in and Jones doesn't seem to be badly missed. Rinne is looking better than he was earlier in the season. NSH is 8-0-2 in their last 10. Tough matchup for us.
VAN vs ARI
-Both teams sucking hard lately. Thankfully one of them has to win. Any OT result would be fantastic
TOR vs NYI
-Probably irrelevant, I think TOR has last place on lock
|
|
|
03-08-2016, 10:52 PM
|
#19
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan
I absolutely have no cares as to what the record is down the stretch. Just don't embarrass yourself out there and compete hard every night. Start building good habits for next year. It's never too early to start playing the right way.
|
I like the way you put it. Ice the best line up you can, give some farm guys looks but most importantly play hard. Then let the chips fall where they may.
I'll guess 6-8-2.
I'm more interested in the Flames role as spoiler than I am in their reverse standings position. I am 100% on board with Mattmans prediction of breaking the Honda Center Curse. I like the new lottery format but it's too bad they couldn't have waited until next year. The team that finishes 27th could draft in any spot from 1-7! The team that finishes dead last could draft 1-4. Not great for the bottom feeders.
How about this spoiler scenario. The Wild need game 82 to make the playoffs so the Flames give Backstrom the start and he eliminates his team. As a result the Avalanche squeak in and Jarome wins the cup.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mister Yamoto For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2016, 11:40 PM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed
If the Flames go 16-0 to end the season, there might be more games after that.
|
Doubt it. That's only 91 points.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 AM.
|
|