Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-29-2016, 11:55 PM   #221
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Don't know why people dislike this trade.

Firstly, nobody that played for the Flames should get ridiculed for whatever reason on their way out, unless they demanded a trade or did something to disrespect the team itself. Jones put his time here, and deserves some respect for it, regardless of how people felt about his overall contributions.

As for this trade, there are a number of ways to think about it, and they all kind of make sense.

First and foremost, the Flames obtained a 6th round pick for a player that they were looking like they wouldn't re-sign. If you are a Jones fan, you should probably be happy, as I am not sure he would get another NHL contract with his numbers, and with the cap looking like it is falling. Lots of cap casualty players leaving the NHL earlier in their careers as they are getting pushed out by younger guys on ELCs. Jones at least now has a chance to show the rest of the NHL that perhaps he is deserving of another deal. I don't think that would happen any longer in Calgary.

Backstrom - you can look at it as the Flames took a contract back to even out the cap. You can look at it as practically a 100% salary cap retention trade. You can look at it as the Flames bringing in a respected Finnish goalie to perhaps guide Ortio for the rest of the season before deciding on him. Any way you slice it, this will really not change the rest of the season. There are no playoffs this year, and nobody is going to ride Ortio or anyone else hard. This is a time to see what the organization has.

As for Backstrom playing or not - I would almost guarantee one start from him (as long as he is in shape) - I bet Hartley starts him against the next Wild game. IIRC, they play in Minnesota, so that is a good opportunity to give a notable goalie a 'send-off' of sorts. I think it is probably the classy thing to do - as long as he is in relative game shape.

Bottom line is that this trade brought back an asset (6th round pick) and opened up an additional roster spot to audition prospects/give them a bit of a carrot for their hard work in Stockton. It MAY also be beneficial to Ortio in having a well-respected Finnish goalie to talk to for the rest of the season and help him along.

I thought that they were going to get rid of Jones, and that it would call for full retention with a late pick back (7th round, or even future considerations). He was just holding a roster spot at the moment, and nothing more. This was good for the Flames, Backstrom and Jones - so there is little to be upset at with respect to this trade.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 02-29-2016, 11:59 PM   #222
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Yamoto View Post
Does it open a roster spot though? 1 player out, 1 player in, right? Back to having three terrible goalies instead of two. Time will tell if that is worth a sixth round draft pick but to me this deal is just so meh why even bother. I'm not for or against this trade. Completely indifferent actually.
Unless Backstrom can play up front it still opens up an opportunity for a forward prospect to get in the line-up. Even if they are going to give Backstrom a couple of games in net, I'm suspecting Ortio will get to start at least 10 of the remaining 20 starts, unless he totally stinks it up.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 12:27 AM   #223
combustiblefuel
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
Exp:
Default

[Yikes wrong thread... I knew I should have taken a left turn in Albuquerque....


Last edited by combustiblefuel; 03-01-2016 at 12:30 AM.
combustiblefuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 12:35 AM   #224
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Yamoto View Post
Does it open a roster spot though? 1 player out, 1 player in, right? Back to having three terrible goalies instead of two. Time will tell if that is worth a sixth round draft pick but to me this deal is just so meh why even bother. I'm not for or against this trade. Completely indifferent actually.
After the deadline, the 23-man roster limit is lifted. However, you can still only dress 18 skaters and 2 goalies for a game.

By trading Jones, the Flames opened up room to dress another skater in his place. But adding Backstrom makes no difference one way or the other, since he'll presumably be the #3 goalie and won't dress for games. Net effect: one spot opens up in the lineup.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

Last edited by Jay Random; 03-01-2016 at 12:38 AM.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 12:46 AM   #225
doctajones428
First Line Centre
 
doctajones428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Exp:
Icon20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Don't know why people dislike this trade.

Firstly, nobody that played for the Flames should get ridiculed for whatever reason on their way out, unless they demanded a trade or did something to disrespect the team itself. Jones put his time here, and deserves some respect for it, regardless of how people felt about his overall contributions.

As for this trade, there are a number of ways to think about it, and they all kind of make sense.

First and foremost, the Flames obtained a 6th round pick for a player that they were looking like they wouldn't re-sign. If you are a Jones fan, you should probably be happy, as I am not sure he would get another NHL contract with his numbers, and with the cap looking like it is falling. Lots of cap casualty players leaving the NHL earlier in their careers as they are getting pushed out by younger guys on ELCs. Jones at least now has a chance to show the rest of the NHL that perhaps he is deserving of another deal. I don't think that would happen any longer in Calgary.

Backstrom - you can look at it as the Flames took a contract back to even out the cap. You can look at it as practically a 100% salary cap retention trade. You can look at it as the Flames bringing in a respected Finnish goalie to perhaps guide Ortio for the rest of the season before deciding on him. Any way you slice it, this will really not change the rest of the season. There are no playoffs this year, and nobody is going to ride Ortio or anyone else hard. This is a time to see what the organization has.

As for Backstrom playing or not - I would almost guarantee one start from him (as long as he is in shape) - I bet Hartley starts him against the next Wild game. IIRC, they play in Minnesota, so that is a good opportunity to give a notable goalie a 'send-off' of sorts. I think it is probably the classy thing to do - as long as he is in relative game shape.

Bottom line is that this trade brought back an asset (6th round pick) and opened up an additional roster spot to audition prospects/give them a bit of a carrot for their hard work in Stockton. It MAY also be beneficial to Ortio in having a well-respected Finnish goalie to talk to for the rest of the season and help him along.

I thought that they were going to get rid of Jones, and that it would call for full retention with a late pick back (7th round, or even future considerations). He was just holding a roster spot at the moment, and nothing more. This was good for the Flames, Backstrom and Jones - so there is little to be upset at with respect to this trade.
A 10-15 goal, 20-30 point third liner is definitely worth more than a 6th, and to be honest, I wouldn't have minded atleast having the rights to sign him to $1-$1.5 a season for bottom 6 duty if any of the minor leaguers weren't ready to replace him next year. I mean it's not like Stajan/Bouma/Jooris/Bollig have been much better this year than him, if at all

Last edited by doctajones428; 03-01-2016 at 12:49 AM.
doctajones428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 12:57 AM   #226
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Watching the video on the Flames site, Jones is excited to be going to a potential playoff team. It may be his last chance and kudos to the Flames for giving it to him. This good treatment is noticed around the league by players and could be more important than holding out for more value.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:22 AM   #227
darthma
Scoring Winger
 
darthma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Down by the sea, where the watermelons grow, back to my home, I dare not go...
Exp:
Default

So... who plays RW for us now?

Also, a quick scroll through the NHL site (what an awful site) shows that our only forward that is right-handed is Josh Jooris. Bleh.

Last edited by darthma; 03-01-2016 at 01:26 AM.
darthma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:56 AM   #228
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darthma View Post
So... who plays RW for us now?

Also, a quick scroll through the NHL site (what an awful site) shows that our only forward that is right-handed is Josh Jooris. Bleh.
Hathaway is a right-handed shot.

Hamilton, Shore, and Arnold are also all righties who could get called up.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 07:09 AM   #229
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doctajones428 View Post
A 10-15 goal, 20-30 point third liner is definitely worth more than a 6th, and to be honest, I wouldn't have minded atleast having the rights to sign him to $1-$1.5 a season for bottom 6 duty if any of the minor leaguers weren't ready to replace him next year. I mean it's not like Stajan/Bouma/Jooris/Bollig have been much better this year than him, if at all
No they aren't. Not yesterday they weren't.

Jones has been an ineffective player for the vast majority of the season, no matter the role.

Hathaway was more effective in one game last night than Jones has been all year.

Last edited by ComixZone; 03-01-2016 at 07:26 AM.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 07:24 AM   #230
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doctajones428 View Post
A 10-15 goal, 20-30 point third liner is definitely worth more than a 6th, and to be honest, I wouldn't have minded atleast having the rights to sign him to $1-$1.5 a season for bottom 6 duty if any of the minor leaguers weren't ready to replace him next year. I mean it's not like Stajan/Bouma/Jooris/Bollig have been much better this year than him, if at all
Seeing as guys like Vrbata and Parenteau didn't get traded for anything yesterday I don't think that is accurate.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 07:51 AM   #231
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I'm not a fan of the deal. The Flames are getting a 6th for swapping contracts, it's not like they are saving money on the deal at all. The only way this makes sense to me is if they use it as an opportunity to audition Backstrom for a cheap contract (less than 1m) next year.

Also for the the comments/questions about his health. He has not been injured at all this year. Minnesota just moved on after they signed Kuemper and Dubnyk; they literally never gave him a chance this year despite him being healthy. Backstrom while unhappy with being the 3rd stringer in Minnesota has not been a distraction for his team and I think that says a lot about his character.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 07:57 AM   #232
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Who really cares if they are saving money. There are no cap issues through the end of the year so it is only about the team saving money, not something I really care about.

I was surprised they got anything for Jones. The definition of a minor trade, something is better than nothing I guess.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 08:11 AM   #233
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
I'm not a fan of the deal. The Flames are getting a 6th for swapping contracts, it's not like they are saving money on the deal at all. The only way this makes sense to me is if they use it as an opportunity to audition Backstrom for a cheap contract (less than 1m) next year.

Also for the the comments/questions about his health. He has not been injured at all this year. Minnesota just moved on after they signed Kuemper and Dubnyk; they literally never gave him a chance this year despite him being healthy. Backstrom while unhappy with being the 3rd stringer in Minnesota has not been a distraction for his team and I think that says a lot about his character.
Would you prefer to have Jones on the roster? They basically bought a 6th round pick. This is basically a nothing trade except the Flames get the chance to add someone for their protected list and see if they develop and are worth signing for 2 to 4 years.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 08:11 AM   #234
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
I'm not a fan of the deal. The Flames are getting a 6th for swapping contracts, it's not like they are saving money on the deal at all.


I do not understand this line of thinking at all.

They swapped contracts in order to get a free draft pick? What's not to like?
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 08:17 AM   #235
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Plus they get to try out a UFA goalie.

As much as Backstrom wouldn't be a long term option, if he returns to his form before the injury, he could be an option as a cheap backup on a 1 year deal.

Obviously he wouldn't be the first option, but why not take a look. At worst he plays a couple games, struggles and is never heard from again. Best case is that he becomes a cheap backup for next season's starter, whomever that is.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 08:25 AM   #236
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Roger Millions @RogMillions
However, I am hearing Backstrom could be in net often in #Flames final 19 games . No exact number but team wants to see 38 year old
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 08:29 AM   #237
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

If Jones is on the roster we may not see Garnet Hathaway play yesterday (debatable since Hudler is also gone). From that perspective, I think we've already won the trade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Roger Millions @RogMillions
However, I am hearing Backstrom could be in net often in #Flames final 19 games . No exact number but team wants to see 38 year old
The tank is on!
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 08:34 AM   #238
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

I don't get that at all (having him come in and play games). If this was Lou he would tell him to stay in Minnesota. It serves no purpose.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 08:37 AM   #239
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
I don't get that at all (having him come in and play games). If this was Lou he would tell him to stay in Minnesota. It serves no purpose.
Spoiler!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 08:43 AM   #240
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
I don't get that at all (having him come in and play games). If this was Lou he would tell him to stay in Minnesota. It serves no purpose.
It's probably part of the agreement that they made with him to waive his NMC so the deal could be made. Personally, I don't think it's a big deal. It's not like the Flames are still battling for a playoff spot.
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy