Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-27-2016, 04:45 PM   #41
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Boston can easily put together sweet packages. PIT has a few guys we might want too. LA doesn't have as much to tempt us IMO.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 04:46 PM   #42
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Interesting pieces

BOS: Zboril(D), Debrusk(LW), Subban(G), Senyshen(RW)
PIT: Murray(G), Sprong(RW)

I wouldn't be opposed a trade where we toss in a 2nd with Russell and get back a top prospect.
Either Senyshyn or Sprong would be very good returns. I wanted both guys in the draft last year.

Sprong has oodles of high-end skill, even more than Shinkaruk or Poirier. What he lacks is mostly just polish. The craziest thing is that the team he plays for has one of the worst blue lines in the QMJHL so what he's doing is all him, what he could do with some puck-moving D like the Flames have would be something to see. He would instantly be our best winger prospect IMHO.

Senyshyn is a big, fast, strong, skilled burner coming from a junior team famous for emphasizing analytics in their own team construction. Potential is something like Chris Kreider. Not sure about the ceiling but he fits the "style" we want to play.

Last edited by GranteedEV; 02-27-2016 at 04:55 PM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 02-27-2016, 04:47 PM   #43
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

News Update

Darren Dreger @DarrenDreger
The Boston Bruins have interest in Dan Hamhuis and at the moment, no reason to believe Hamhuis doesn't view Boston as an option.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 05:01 PM   #44
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yeah, far too much focus on Dreger here. From what I understand, his claim to fame is having some contacts within the league office itself. Recall the Jokinen situation with him and the trade to the Rangers.

So, while he does have the ear of some GM's and agents, no different then some others, but where he gets his scoops is getting a heads up on trade calls etc so he can break it first from that end.

I think any team top 6 in the East will take a look at guys. So Isles, Rags, Tampa, Bruins, Pens, FLA all looking to having to make the playoffs, load up with depth, and go through WSH.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 07:06 PM   #45
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

On HNIC they said Washington might look at Hamhuis & Russell with Carlson on LTIR giving them some cap flexibility.

Last edited by sureLoss; 02-27-2016 at 07:30 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 07:26 PM   #46
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Gotta wonder if the caps would consider moving Samsonov or Vrana
jg13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 07:31 PM   #47
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Gotta wonder if the caps would consider moving Samsonov or Vrana
Highly doubtful they'd move Samsonov so quickly after picking him in the first round not too long ago. They obviously really like him and wouldn't trade him for a rental.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 07:34 PM   #48
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Highly doubtful they'd move Samsonov so quickly after picking him in the first round not too long ago. They obviously really like him and wouldn't trade him for a rental.
Yup.

Plus, the Flames need a ready-now (or ready-soon) goalie, not another 19 year old
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 08:57 PM   #49
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
It's going to be embarrassing for Feaster if Russell goes for more than Iginla.
Conversely, it'ĺl also look good on Feaster if a guy he picked up for a 6th round pick gets that kind of return.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 02-27-2016, 09:02 PM   #50
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Conversely, it'ĺl also look good on Feaster if a guy he picked up for a 6th round pick gets that kind of return.
True
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 09:04 PM   #51
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

my gut is telling me that Russell is traded tomorrow morning before the Flames get on their flight out.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 09:13 PM   #52
druetetective
Crash and Bang Winger
 
druetetective's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Windsor
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Conversely, it'ĺl also look good on Feaster if a guy he picked up for a 6th round pick gets that kind of return.
It's funny I remember that off-season the trade I was most pleased with was T.j Galiardi who was only 25 and a few seasons prior he put up 40 points in 70 gp as a rookie. He had injury problems the next couple yearsand I really thought he would put it together in Calgary.

Russell looks like he will net us a huge gain.


The book is still out on Colborne. I have faith he will be a good player for us one day, although the majority have now written him off.

So 1/3 for Feaster on the reclamation project trades that year?
druetetective is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 09:55 PM   #53
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

You have to think that WSH makes a strong push for Russell. With the strong season they've had, it'd be a shame to have the late injury to Carlson be the reason they fail in the playoffs.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 10:28 PM   #54
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
You have to think that WSH makes a strong push for Russell. With the strong season they've had, it'd be a shame to have the late injury to Carlson be the reason they fail in the playoffs.
Russell and Hiller for the next Brett Hull please.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 10:29 PM   #55
Machiavelli
Franchise Player
 
Machiavelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default Dreger:Russell told likely will be traded. Pit and Bos front runners on stron...

Wrong thread.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
Machiavelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2016, 06:49 AM   #56
Sample00
Sleazy Banker
 
Sample00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cold Lake Alberta Canada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
It's going to be embarrassing for Feaster if Russell goes for more than Iginla.
The Iginla situation was also different though. He only gave a list of two teams that he would go to which affected the trade value. Russell goes where he is traded to, giving Treliving much more options and hopefully a better return.
Sample00 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Sample00 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2016, 07:11 AM   #57
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
It's going to be embarrassing for Feaster if Russell goes for more than Iginla.
Not getting more for Hudler than he got for Glencross must have been embarrassing for Treliving. Potentially shows some regression in Brad's abilities.

Worse than that for Flames fans, Brad is running out of assets acquired by Feaster to trade. The vast majority o assets that Brad has acquired are untradeable (Hiller, Raymond, Engelland). Thankfully he has some of these Feaster assets to move like Hudler and Russell.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2016, 07:13 AM   #58
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
Not getting more for Hudler than he got for Glencross must have been embarrassing for Treliving. Potentially shows some regression in Brad's abilities.

Worse than that for Flames fans, Brad is running out of assets acquired by Feaster to trade. The vast majority o assets that Brad has acquired are untradeable (Hiller, Raymond, Engelland). Thankfully he has some of these Feaster assets to move like Hudler and Russell.
No.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2016, 07:18 AM   #59
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
Not getting more for Hudler than he got for Glencross must have been embarrassing for Treliving. Potentially shows some regression in Brad's abilities.

Worse than that for Flames fans, Brad is running out of assets acquired by Feaster to trade. The vast majority o assets that Brad has acquired are untradeable (Hiller, Raymond, Engelland). Thankfully he has some of these Feaster assets to move like Hudler and Russell.
You've listed 3 assets, one of which is absolutely tradable in Engelland. The rest, they wouldn't want to trade, so your math, along with your assessment of GMs, is way off.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2016, 08:10 AM   #60
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
Not getting more for Hudler than he got for Glencross must have been embarrassing for Treliving. Potentially shows some regression in Brad's abilities.



Worse than that for Flames fans, Brad is running out of assets acquired by Feaster to trade. The vast majority o assets that Brad has acquired are untradeable (Hiller, Raymond, Engelland). Thankfully he has some of these Feaster assets to move like Hudler and Russell.

The trade market changes dramatically year to year.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy