Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-22-2016, 07:32 AM   #21
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Polak is absolute trash so this return bodes well for Russell.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
14
Old 02-22-2016, 07:33 AM   #22
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savemedrzaius View Post
I'm pretty sure with the Pens the deal is if the Pens make the playoffs the Leafs get their 1st rounder. If they don't make it they get their 2nd rounder.
Not entirely true

If Pens make playoffs, Leafs get the Pens 2016 first rounder and Pens get their 2016 second rounder back (not leafs 2nd rounder)

If Pens miss playoffs this year but make next year, the leafs get Pens 2017 first and Pens get Leafs 2017 2nd rounder

If Pens miss playoffs this year and next year, leafs get Pens 2017 second rounder and Pens do not get a pick
albertGQ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 07:35 AM   #23
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Polak is absolute trash so this return bodes well for Russell.
The fact that one team stupidly overpaid - largely because they are cap screwed - doesn't set the market for Russell at all.

This is more along the lines of the Regehr trade to Buffalo.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 07:36 AM   #24
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Polak is absolute trash so this return bodes well for Russell.
seems a bit harsh. He's been a pretty servicable bottom 3 guy in my viewings of the leafs this year.

russel definitely is in a tier above polak so i don't disagree that this helps set the price for russel.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 07:41 AM   #25
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Great job by the Leafs.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 07:42 AM   #26
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
seems a bit harsh. He's been a pretty servicable bottom 3 guy in my viewings of the leafs this year.

russel definitely is in a tier above polak so i don't disagree that this helps set the price for russel.
Polak might have been the only other relatively big name on the market right now with worse advanced stats than Russell.

I don't understand how some GMs can be so far behind the times.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 07:47 AM   #27
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Gotta admit this caught me off guard but Im excited to be joining the playoff drive.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 02-22-2016, 07:51 AM   #28
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Sharks traded their 1st for Martin Jones. So they probably wanted to keep 2016. I'd guess if it was the 2016 pick, they'd have gotten a 2017 3rd instead of a second 2nd round pick.
Yeah, no, I got confused - it was the Ducks who traded their 2nd this year (for Bieksa). I'm apparently off to an addle-minded start today...
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 07:52 AM   #29
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Shouldn't you be smiling then and does this make you stop being negative about the Flames? lol

You'd have to think this bodes well for the Flames but Russell is a different kind of player but I think Russell is now the top UFA defenseman on the market. I'm thinking to the Stars.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 07:53 AM   #30
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

^Hamhuis is still the top guy up for trade. So watch Vancouver hold on to him and lose him for nothing.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 08:08 AM   #31
Hackey
Franchise Player
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Nice return.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 08:10 AM   #32
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Unfortunately this looks like a GM going after a big 240 pound physical defenseman with the belief that's what's needed in the playoffs. Much like Douglass Murray a couple years ago.

I don't know if this has a ton of bearing on Russell.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 08:14 AM   #33
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
Unfortunately this looks like a GM going after a big 240 pound physical defenseman with the belief that's what's needed in the playoffs. Much like Douglass Murray a couple years ago.

I don't know if this has a ton of bearing on Russell.
Polak is only 29, he isn't anywhere near being over the hill like Douglass Murray was when he was rented. Polak is a solid addition by San Jose here and considering that Dallas was rumoured to be interested in one of Russell/Polak that means this trade does hold some significance when looking at trade value for Russell. Right now I think a 2nd rd pick and a 4th rnd pick is about the value for Kris.
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Heavy Jack For This Useful Post:
Old 02-22-2016, 08:25 AM   #34
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
Polak is only 29, he isn't anywhere near being over the hill like Douglass Murray was when he was rented. Polak is a solid addition by San Jose here and considering that Dallas was rumoured to be interested in one of Russell/Polak that means this trade does hold some significance when looking at trade value for Russell. Right now I think a 2nd rd pick and a 4th rnd pick is about the value for Kris.
Polak was arguably a #5 on the Leafs throughout most the season though. A depth bottom pairing defenseman returned two 2nd round picks (with a fourth liner and a 0.5M dead space contract thrown in). If that's what Polak got, Russell, being the inarguable better defenseman, should be worth at least multiple 2nds as well. However, I think Wilson's thinking "size good." Therefore, I don't think we can safely say that Russell>Polak, Russell's return will therefore be greater than Polak's.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 08:26 AM   #35
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
Russell >> Polak.

That'd a great return for him. Spaling is worth probably a 3rd, so a 2nd + 3rd roughly for Polak.
Different players... Polak > Russell in toughness and PK

Polak was getting 17 minutes /game for the whole season when the Blues traded Russell to the Flames for a 5th round pick.

San Jose is looking at the Ducks in the 1st round. Who would you rather have on the ice against the Ducks top 2 lines?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ricardodw For This Useful Post:
Old 02-22-2016, 08:28 AM   #36
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
Polak was arguably a #5 on the Leafs throughout most the season though. A depth bottom pairing defenseman returned two 2nd round picks (with a fourth liner and a 0.5M dead space contract thrown in). If that's what Polak got, Russell, being the inarguable better defenseman should be worth at least multiple 2nds as well. However, I think Wilson's thinking "size good." Therefore, I don't think we can safely say that Russell>Polak, Russell's return will therefore be greater than Polak's.
Teams get far more desperate as the deadline approaches especially if other teams they are battling with get what they need. Hopefully we dont wait too long though... I see what you're saying but I still think we could/should get a bigger return for a better defensive option.
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 08:36 AM   #37
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 08:43 AM   #38
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Polak might have been the only other relatively big name on the market right now with worse advanced stats than Russell.

I don't understand how some GMs can be so far behind the times.
Cause advanced stats aren't as important as a group of fans who overrates their impact think they are. I'm not sure why they are so behind the times they actually think some stats replace watching a player, its hilarious!

In reality Polak is a gritty, physical, pain in the ass to play against. The exact type of defenceman that helps you whack, hack and punish forwards near your net. Where are the advanced stats for how much it hurts to stand in front of the net when Polak is all over you?

This is why Engelland will be worth a 2nd+ if we choose to move him. Advanced stat fanboys will always underrate the value of physical defensive defencemen going into the playoffs. Having extra depth in that area is key.

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 02-22-2016 at 08:49 AM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 02-22-2016, 08:48 AM   #39
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Good deal for the Leafs. Hopefully 2nd rounders + are the currency for this year's deadline.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2016, 08:48 AM   #40
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

This sets a great value for Russell. Yes Polak is a different kind of player but my sense is that Russell is valued differently but ultimately much higher by nhl gms... Thus the expectation that he'll make 4-5 mil as a UFA. I don't think anyone would say that about Polak.

And there are other parts buy nothing massively significant. Spaling has negligible value... 1 goal all year. Torres is a bit of a cap dump but only makes 1 milion. Net value is not close to a 2nd. Maybe a 4th or 5th for just that transaction at most.

Dare I say it... I'm hoping for a late first for Russell now. Although I agree that targeting a prospect who is closer would make more sense for where the flames are at.
Matty81 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy