Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-14-2016, 02:28 PM   #41
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler View Post
Pretty pathetic to have people here essentially celebrating a man's death. I disagree with virtually all of his social views, but I can still respect him - right winger or socialist you still have to be a supremely accomplished jurist to get a seat on that bench.
The world's smallest violin is playing for this post.

Why do you think we should respond to this any differently than we currently are? We don't respect him, that's the point. You're more welcome to, but don't tell me I have to pretend I give a crap that a bigoted demagogue has croaked.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 03:01 AM   #42
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Obama called Scalia one of the best jurists of our time, who will be deeply missed. Obama, clearly on the opposite side of political views to Scalia's, didn't have to or need to praise him, he could have said, simply, my condolences, and consider it sufficient. He didn't. People may not care much about the death of an influential Supreme Court Judge, but to cheer his death is really disgusting.

On a more general note, with Scalia's passing, the political balance of the US Supreme Court is temporarily even. A Republican appointment will shift it back to the right, a Democratic one - to the left. It seriously bothers me that the highest legal authoriy of the country is so pronouncely politicized and affected by judges' political beliefs. Shouldn't it by the very definition of jurisprudence be apolitical? Or is it a pipe dream considering modern realities? Does it bother anyone else?
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CaptainYooh For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 03:05 AM   #43
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Well, I think it's been more modern times that have not only divided the left and right so dramatically, but also made them so combative towards each other. Politicians (and political judges) seemed more willing to work together in the past. In my observation anyway. I could be wrong.

Then the radical right came along and decided they didn't want to play anymore unless they won.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Daradon For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 08:03 AM   #44
driveway
A Fiddler Crab
 
driveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
On a more general note, with Scalia's passing, the political balance of the US Supreme Court is temporarily even. A Republican appointment will shift it back to the right, a Democratic one - to the left. It seriously bothers me that the highest legal authoriy of the country is so pronouncely politicized and affected by judges' political beliefs. Shouldn't it by the very definition of jurisprudence be apolitical? Or is it a pipe dream considering modern realities? Does it bother anyone else?
It seems that way because that's the way the news reports it, but the Supreme Court isn't actually as 'divided' as it seems. Since 2008, here are the number of cases ruled on by the court and the number which were decided by a 5-4 decision.

2008: 83 cases, 15 splits
2009: 92 cases, 13
2010: 85 cases, 13
2011: 78 cases, 14
2012: 79 cases, 19
2013: 75 cases, 9
2014: 74 cases, 17
2015: 18 cases, 0 splits (2015 term runs until October 2, 2016)

As you can see, the vast majority of supreme court cases are not 5-4 partisan split decisions. A lot of the 'big' ones are, sure, but most cases aren't decided on party-line votes.

By comparison, here's the number of unanimous decisions reached during Obama's presidency.

2008: 30
2009: 36
2010: 39
2011: 34
2012: 38
2013: 46
2014: 28
2015: 10
driveway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to driveway For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 08:34 AM   #45
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Yeah, I guess I'm thinking more congress and such. And of course, the big cases that hit the news.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 08:54 AM   #46
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Sad but true...



Again, this system is horribly broken.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 08:55 AM   #47
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

Let's all take a moment out from arguing about whether Scalia was human garbage or not and glimpse into the abyss at the hot, new and edgy conspiracy theories surrounding his death.

https://twitter.com/MrAWFULsuits/sta...28959517413376

Quote:
No way Scalia wasn't murdered. No way
https://twitter.com/DooleyJordan/sta...39074672836609

Quote:
Conservative Justice Scalia dies of natural causes after Clinton says she would appoint Obama to the Supreme Court... Interesting
https://twitter.com/00_anabel/status/698640159961698304

Quote:
Democrat Communist Anita Dunn Brags "We Control the Media" OBAMA & REGIME MURDERED JUSTICE SCALIA @Route66Stevie pic.twitter.com/F4J6tFER9W
https://twitter.com/ttocsnesor/statu...36262777974784

Quote:
#SCOTUS Scalia...Maybe he was murdered?! I wouldn't put anything past these #######s on the left.
https://twitter.com/97Salisbury/stat...34130720976897

Quote:
@official_barak MURDERED JUSTICE SCALIA obummer has to have at least one more appointment in order 2 keep the supreme ct liberal
https://twitter.com/aintroketscienc/...33499104903168

Quote:
RIP Justice Scalia. I believe he was murdered. He was the only true constitutional judge
https://twitter.com/ProNaif/status/698631168275513344

Quote:
Scalia was murdered by @ggreenwald. Don't even try to enforce the inapplicable lying-is-bad "rule" for this enormous ######bag.
https://twitter.com/RealTrillBill/st...29397285314561

Quote:
Hillary murdered Scalia
...

And now a Michelle Bachmann palate cleaner.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PsYcNeT For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 11:37 AM   #48
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post

It seriously bothers me that the highest legal authoriy of the country is so pronouncely politicized and affected by judges' political beliefs. Shouldn't it by the very definition of jurisprudence be apolitical? Or is it a pipe dream considering modern realities? Does it bother anyone else?
Political beliefs? I think it's way more scary that it's being effected by religious beliefs.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to calgaryblood For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 12:04 PM   #49
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

I don't pretend to follow what happens at the supreme court, much less the personalities on the bench.

What has this guy done that has made him so vilified on this site?
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 12:22 PM   #50
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
I don't pretend to follow what happens at the supreme court, much less the personalities on the bench.

What has this guy done that has made him so vilified on this site?
http://www.ontheissues.org/Antonin_Scalia.htm
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 01:50 PM   #51
Swift
Not Taylor
 
Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Exp:
Default

A funny House of Cards-style fantasy post I read elsewhere would be that Obama gets both sides to agree that the next president should be the one who nominates the supreme court judge. Obama then resigns. Biden takes his place and nominates Obama for the position. Then Biden announces he's running for re-election.
__________________
"We are no longer living. We are empty of substance, and our head devours us. Our ancestors were more alive. Nothing separated them from themselves."
Swift is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Swift For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 02:21 PM   #52
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post


wow
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 03:44 PM   #53
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

An interesting point is Scalia decent on the case for benefits going to gay couples is used by state courts to legalize gay marriage.

He says something to the effect of if you agree with the reasoning presented in this case you basically have to legalize gay marriage.

And because of that desent years of court battles were deferred or delayed.

The interesting thing with Scalia is that his general preference was status quo. I would say a belief to force the executive and legislative branches to enact progress rather than the judiciary. So if the U.S. House and Congress functioned I think Scalia my have ended up being viewed more favourably.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 05:12 PM   #54
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

The Onion has been killing it this week.

http://www.theonion.com/article/obam...bortion--52361
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 05:22 PM   #55
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon View Post
Eric Holder is my choice, the repugs would freak
No chance he would even get considered. The Justice Department had too many issues under him.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 05:26 PM   #56
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Good riddance. He was a true scumbag and his death is a positive for Americans.
Really? I don't agree with him on most stuff, but your head is stuck in the sand if you believe that.

Quote:
in 2011’s Brown v. EMA, a double victory for First Amendment advocates that protected both depictions of violence and minors’ rights. And he dissented in Maryland v. King, arguing that the Fourth Amendment forbids law enforcement from collecting DNA from arrestees. (His fierce dissent sounds like it could have sprung from the pen of Edward Snowden.)
Quote:
Despite his King vote, Scalia was widely viewed by many Americans as a harshly law-and-order justice. Again, that label is simply inaccurate. In many contexts, Scalia was extraordinarily protective of Americans’ right to privacy—though he himself would never use that term. He wrote the majority opinion in Kyllo v. United States, a 5-4 ruling that barred police from peeping into a home with a thermal-imaging device. He also wrote the majority opinion in Florida v. Jardines (another 5-4 decision), barring police from entering private property with a drug-sniffing dog without a warrant. Time and time again, he cast votes to protect drivers from intrusive car searches by law enforcement. Just last term, he sided against the police in a landmark ruling that restored constitutional rights to motorists illegally detained by cops.
Quote:
When I was younger and angrier, I expected to cheer Scalia’s retirement, elated by his absence from the court. Today, I only feel overwhelming sadness. In my time covering the court, I’ve grown to admire the gruff, cantankerous man who lobs bombs and quips at nervous lawyers and bemused justices alike. Scalia was the justice you either loved or hated, relentlessly opinionated, representative of everything that was right or wrong with the Supreme Court. He was witty, unpredictable, caustic, indignant, and brilliant. He was an American original. And after the partisan howling over his legacy fades, that is how his country will remember him.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...t_justice.html

Sounds like a real scumbag.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 05:53 PM   #57
Mickey76
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Surprised at how much hatred for Scalia here. I was fortunate to visit the Supreme Court and listen to a morning of oral arguments in December 2009. In any event as luck would have it we got to listen to Conrad Black's appeal. Listening to Scalia and Breyer was a real treat, I have no legal training or experience but listening to the clarity with which those two men questioned both sides made feel like I actually knew what was going on.
Mickey76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 06:18 PM   #58
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Really? I don't agree with him on most stuff, but your head is stuck in the sand if you believe that.






http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...t_justice.html

Sounds like a real scumbag.

This is a man who said if we protect gays we must protect child molestors as well and that if we allow gay people to have sex we should also allow incest.

I stand by what I said. He was a true scum bag and the world and especially America is better off with him 6 feet under and I hope he enjoys hell.

The only thing better than him dying would have been if he wasn't even born.

I don't need to feel sympathy for someone like him. He doesn't deserve it.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 06:46 PM   #59
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Political beliefs? I think it's way more scary that it's being effected by religious beliefs.
Often one in the same down there. And for as learned and educated Scalia was, I'd say he fit that mold.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 06:53 PM   #60
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Thanks for the counter point Azure.

As I mentioned in my first point, I'm not going to prentend I'm not happy he's off the bench. But it sucks the way it happened.

Though I disagree with 80-90 percent of his positions, I do admire him for a few things. No matter how you slice it, he worked hard for America. It may not be the America we want to see, but he worked for it, a important public servant.

And yes, he did have some good rulings and good arguments.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy