Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2016, 02:43 PM   #341
Dan02
Franchise Player
 
Dan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoinAllTheWay View Post
A reasonable person wouldn't have jumped on the track in the first place. Period.
Why is that? we have entire sports and olympic events based on getting down that track as fast as possible.
Dan02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 02:46 PM   #342
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4 View Post
To keep you from escaping and ruining the internet?
Petulant
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 02:48 PM   #343
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Honestly, COP being held liable in this case would appear (based on what I know) that the system is horribly broken.
What is unknown far exceeds what is known.

I wouldn't be surprised if there were other instances of this being attempted, only to be foiled.

It is difficult to speak in absolutes in these types of situations.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 02:48 PM   #344
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02 View Post
Why is that? we have entire sports and olympic events based on getting down that track as fast as possible.
Laugh.
Weitz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 02:48 PM   #345
GoinAllTheWay
Franchise Player
 
GoinAllTheWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not sure
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02 View Post
Why is that? we have entire sports and olympic events based on getting down that track as fast as possible.
Do they do these sports/events in facilities that are closed using equipment that was not designed for that sport/event in completely unsupervised conditions featuring people that are trespassing and in all likelihood have no training?

Last edited by GoinAllTheWay; 02-09-2016 at 02:52 PM.
GoinAllTheWay is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GoinAllTheWay For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2016, 02:52 PM   #346
jayocal
Crash and Bang Winger
 
jayocal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I have a buddy in Dallas and apparently this story made headlines down there as well.
jayocal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:03 PM   #347
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayocal View Post
I have a buddy in Dallas and apparently this story made headlines down there as well.
It was on BBC news on Saturday morning.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:07 PM   #348
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Do victims always sue in these scenarios? They have the legal right to and we assume they always will. I'm just wondering if there are cases where the victim or their survivors decides to let it go. I'm not passing judgment either way as I have not been faced with that decision.
edslunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:09 PM   #349
flamesfan1297
First Line Centre
 
flamesfan1297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Or....they could acknowledge the 'Private Property' sign. Or the 'No Trespassing' sign. Or the 'Authorized Personnel Only' sign.

But you're right, more signs is the answer.

They were negligent for not having that crucial final sign.
This ^^ obviously if they put a sign at the top saying there is a gate they wouldn't have gone down. But as far as I'm concerned the 'private property' and 'no trespassing' signs should be enough. The gate wouldn't be a problem for anyone using the track legally as they'd know about it. If someone breaks into my house when I'm not home and my dog hurts them, am I liable because I didn't put up "beware of dog signs"? No, because it is private property and they illegally entered. Obviously I know the case at COP is more extreme.
flamesfan1297 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:12 PM   #350
ranchlandsselling
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly06Cup View Post
Was the entrance to the bobsleigh track securely barred?

If there were an open entrance with a death trap at the other end, I would consider COP grossly negligent. It would be just as easy for another person to accidentally fall into the track and die.

Trespassing is moot. You can't put landmines on your private property and deny liability because others were trespassing. Sounds like a dangerous contraption with foreseeable consequences that COP could have better guarded against.
You can't accidentally fall into the track.

I debated playing on it once in the summer when we used to train at the Bob Niven Centre. The thought of climbing the fence and somehow getting into the track (this was near the bottom) made me quickly lose interest. It would have required a ladder. Anyone along any length of the track excluding the starting gate would also require a ladder to fall into. Additionally if you fell onto the track and didn't also fall onto a sled/toboggan you'd likely not slide into the chain/wall. Workers walk along the track in boots. It's not an ocean or lake. It's an elevated structure.

Last edited by ranchlandsselling; 02-09-2016 at 03:27 PM.
ranchlandsselling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:13 PM   #351
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Nenshi even stated in his interview:

"Theres a point where theres no more you can do."
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:14 PM   #352
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch View Post
Do victims always sue in these scenarios? They have the legal right to and we assume they always will. I'm just wondering if there are cases where the victim or their survivors decides to let it go. I'm not passing judgment either way as I have not been faced with that decision.
I know with the fatal accidents act you don't even have to sue, you can pretty much just quote the act and they will pay you.
Hockeyguy15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:14 PM   #353
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

lol do you know if someone breaks into your house and say you're doing renovations and removed the stairs and they fall off the main floor and into the basement and break their legs, you as the homeowner are liable?

That's one of the cases we had in (the very limited law courses) school

Last edited by polak; 02-09-2016 at 03:18 PM.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:17 PM   #354
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I am not going to debate this, since I do this for a living, but I will say again - the trespassing is irrelevant.
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to VladtheImpaler For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2016, 03:17 PM   #355
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
lol do you know if someone breaks into your house and say you're doing renovations and they fall of the main floor and into the basement and break their legs, the home owner is liable?

That's one of the cases we had in (the very limited law courses) school
That would probably be covered under your home owners insurance.

I'm sure COP also has some insurance in place that would cover something like this.
Hockeyguy15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:18 PM   #356
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler View Post
I am not going to debate this, since I do this for a living, but I will say again - the trespassing is irrelevant.
Out of curiosity would COP still be liable if they crashed and died without the gate in place?
Hockeyguy15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:19 PM   #357
WhiteTiger
Franchise Player
 
WhiteTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler View Post
I am not going to debate this, since I do this for a living, but I will say again - the trespassing is irrelevant.
You would know, as you do it for a living...but, imo, that's ****'ing ridiculous.
WhiteTiger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to WhiteTiger For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2016, 03:19 PM   #358
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15 View Post
That would probably be covered under your home owners insurance.

I'm sure COP also has some insurance in place that would cover something like this.
Yeah I don't know how the insurance and payout works but the liability would still be on you or in the original story, COP.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:19 PM   #359
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler View Post
I am not going to debate this, since I do this for a living, but I will say again - the trespassing is irrelevant.
Wow. I dont doubt you, not just because I know you but also because you'll steal my dumplings next time, but wow.

I find it hard to believe that the trespassing is irrelevant, but obviously it must be but as 'not a lawyer' I dont feel that it should be.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:21 PM   #360
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15 View Post
Out of curiosity would COP still be liable if they crashed and died without the gate in place?
I don't think the issue is the gate.

The issue is there accessing the track.

Why didn't COP take sufficient steps to stop that from happening.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy