02-07-2016, 11:59 AM
|
#5981
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by herashak
Eriksson most likely has a fair bit more value than hudler.
|
And why would that be? Over the last three seasons Hudler has been the much more productive player.
Hudler - 207 GP, 55G, 103A, 158P
Eriksson - 194 GP, 48G, 76A, 124P
What makes Eriksson have "a fair bit more value" than Hudler? I mean, other than usual hype that comes from playing for an eastern based team and the complete lack of respect players get while biding their time in Calgary.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:01 PM
|
#5982
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
A key to trading Wideman will be getting his suspension reduced. He will have served 13 games before the 29th so if the suspension is reduced to 15 games he could still be in play at the deadline and a team would take a chance considering they get him for another year as well.
|
Wideman's suspension is likely irrelevant. Most teams will be grabbing him for the stretch drive and the playoffs, plus the following year. When that suspension is up will likely have a very small bearing on anyone's interest in Wideman.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:03 PM
|
#5983
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
Mark McNeil is a total bust, no thank you.
|
And to think I was hoping the Flames would pick him. Durrr
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:05 PM
|
#5984
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
And why would that be? Over the last three seasons Hudler has been the much more productive player.
Hudler - 207 GP, 55G, 103A, 158P
Eriksson - 194 GP, 48G, 76A, 124P
What makes Eriksson have "a fair bit more value" than Hudler? I mean, other than usual hype that comes from playing for an eastern based team and the complete lack of respect players get while biding their time in Calgary.
|
Younger, better skater, more consistent goal scorer, better two way game.
Eriksson is much more valuable IMO. Your cherry picking of their stats ignores several years where Eriksson scored 26-36 goals, totals Hudler has NEVER achieved in his entire career. Eriksson is clearly the more consistent goal scorer if you look at their full careers. And as the younger player shouldn't be declining as soon as Hudler will.
No question really.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:42 PM
|
#5985
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
If we can ship Wideman off for Eriksson that would be great, especially if we can ink him to a new contract. Would look good on the top line on RW.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:44 PM
|
#5986
|
Franchise Player
|
Maybe Boston is hoping to begin a trend of recapturing old bruins. Wideman, colborne and a third seems reasonable.
I wouldn't mind putting the extra 2+ million we would have to invest in colborne toward signing eriksson to a three year deal.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:45 PM
|
#5987
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Wideman's suspension is likely irrelevant. Most teams will be grabbing him for the stretch drive and the playoffs, plus the following year. When that suspension is up will likely have a very small bearing on anyone's interest in Wideman.
|
The 7 games Wideman will miss post deadline represent 1/3 of the stretch drive so I do think the length of the suspension is highly relevant.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:47 PM
|
#5988
|
First Line Centre
|
Here's a few cheap and young pieces I think the Flames should explore:
-- JVR (LW 26yr)
-- J. Skinner (LW 23yr)
-- J. Silverberg (RW 25 yr)
-- K. Hayes (RW 26yr)
-- J. Hayes (RW 26yr)
-- K. Rychel (LW 20yr)
-- B. Pirri (LW 24yr)
-- J. Drouin (LW 20yr)
I would place the following guys on the block to land them:
-- K. Russell
-- M. Backlund
-- J. Colborne
-- D. Wideman (50% retained)
-- J. Hudler
-- D. Jones
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:48 PM
|
#5989
|
First Line Centre
|
Double post
Last edited by MarkGio; 02-07-2016 at 01:16 PM.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:53 PM
|
#5990
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkGio
Here's a few cheap and young pieces I think the Flames should explore:
-- JVR (LW 26yr)
-- J. Skinner (LW 23yr)
-- J. Silverberg (RW 25 yr)
-- K. Hayes (RW 26yr)
-- J. Hayes (RW 26yr)
-- K. Rychel (LW 20yr)
-- B. Pirri (LW 24yr)
-- J. Drouin (LW 20yr)
I would place the following guys on the block to land them:
-- K. Russell
-- M. Backlund
-- J. Colborne
-- D. Wideman (50% retained)
-- J. Hudler
-- D. Jones
|
One of those guys is not like the other. It would take one of the young core guys to get JVR out of Toronto.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:55 PM
|
#5991
|
First Line Centre
|
Flames scout taking in habs canes game.
From Garrioch Twitter feed.
Lots more scouts in Montreal today than there were here last night in Ottawa. #NHL
Plenty of NHL scouts at Sunday's #Habs vs. #Hurricanes game at Bell Centre:
Don't play habs until March 20 and no games vs hurricanes this season.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 12:58 PM
|
#5992
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
One of those guys is not like the other. It would take one of the young core guys to get JVR out of Toronto.
|
That's what we said about getting Dougie out of Boston
Last edited by doctajones428; 02-07-2016 at 01:00 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to doctajones428 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2016, 01:14 PM
|
#5993
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkGio
Here's a few cheap and young pieces I think the Flames should explore:
-- JVR (LW 26yr)
-- J. Skinner (LW 23yr)
-- J. Silverberg (RW 25 yr)
-- K. Hayes (RW 26yr)
-- J. Hayes (RW 26yr)
-- K. Rychel (LW 20yr)
-- B. Pirri (LW 24yr)
-- J. Drouin (LW 20yr)
I would place the following guys on the block to land them:
-- K. Russell
-- M. Backlund
-- J. Colborne
-- D. Wideman (50% retained)
-- J. Hudler
-- D. Jones
|
And why would any of those teams give such a deal more than half a second of thought?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2016, 01:18 PM
|
#5994
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
One of those guys is not like the other. It would take one of the young core guys to get JVR out of Toronto.
|
Disagree. His career high is 61 points he's 26 now. Not a chance he would cost one of Gaudreau/Monahan/Bennett/Gio/Brodie/Hamilton.
I could see something like Poirier + 1st (not Flames own, if they land a late first from another trade).
Last edited by Da_Chief; 02-07-2016 at 01:20 PM.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 01:22 PM
|
#5995
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
And why would any of those teams give such a deal more than half a second of thought?
|
I didn't propose any deal? Also, a lot of those guys are struggling right now:
-- Silverberg 17pts in 50gp
-- K.Hayes 22pts in 49gp
-- J. Hayes 23pts in 49gp
-- B. Pirri 23pts in 49gp
-- K. Rychel 9pts in 23gp
So if, for example, Silverberg is worth a 2nd and a 3rd, but Anahiem doesn't want any current Flames roster players, doesn't mean the Flames can't sell off Hudler to another club for a 2nd and 3rd to give to Anahiem.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 01:24 PM
|
#5996
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief
Disagree. His career high is 61 points he's 26 now. Not a chance he would cost one of Gaudreau/Monahan/Bennett/Gio/Brodie/Hamilton.
I could see something like Poirier + 1st (not Flames own, if they land a late first from another trade).
|
I disagree with that return, the Leafs would hang up unless that 1st was a top 10. JVR is a big bodied sniper in the prime of his career. I would also argue his numbers have suffered playing on that crappy roster.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 01:41 PM
|
#5997
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Younger, better skater, more consistent goal scorer, better two way game.
|
I'll give you the younger argument, but disagree with the rest. If Eriksson was such a consistent goal scorer shouldn't he be outscoring Hudler, especially playing on a much better team, like Boston? I also don' think the difference in age is going to be a detractor between either. I can't see 18 months impacting much, especially for two guys that are going to be rentals. Add in Hudler's Stanley Cup experience I think that easily gives him the edge over Eriksson as a rental.
Quote:
Eriksson is much more valuable IMO. Your cherry picking of their stats ignores several years where Eriksson scored 26-36 goals, totals Hudler has NEVER achieved in his entire career. Eriksson is clearly the more consistent goal scorer if you look at their full careers. And as the younger player shouldn't be declining as soon as Hudler will.
|
Except when establishing their fair market value they should only be judged on their performances over a reasonable period of time, which should probably be the last three years and for their current teams, which ironically just happens to be in the same time period.
Hey, here's some more "cherry picked" stats for you. What each player has done in the post season.
Hudler - 77 GP, 16G, 25A, 41P
Eriksson - 34 GP, 6G, 8A, 14P
Even just "cherry picking" their recent playoff performances the edge is to Hudler.
Hudler - 11 GP, 4G, 4A, 8P
Eriksson - 12 GP, 2G, 3A, 5P
Yeah, no question really. Eriksson gets to live off his reputation of play from 4 years ago on a different team instead of being judged on the past number of years, the same number of years, as Hudler. Hudler has been terribly under rated during his career and continues to be.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2016, 02:26 PM
|
#5998
|
Self-Retired
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I disagree with that return, the Leafs would hang up unless that 1st was a top 10. JVR is a big bodied sniper in the prime of his career. I would also argue his numbers have suffered playing on that crappy roster.
|
If that were the case, JVR would be making other players better rather than needing better players to play with, making him better.. If that makes any sense.
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 02:49 PM
|
#5999
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Wideman's suspension is likely irrelevant. Most teams will be grabbing him for the stretch drive and the playoffs, plus the following year. When that suspension is up will likely have a very small bearing on anyone's interest in Wideman.
|
Yeah getting a team to think they can get the Offensive production from Wideman that the Flames did last year will have far more impact on a potential deal.
For the record I don't think he's going anywhere unless the Flames want a worse player who's signed to more term for more money like David Clarkson.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
02-07-2016, 02:54 PM
|
#6000
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan
Yeah getting a team to think they can get the Offensive production from Wideman that the Flames did last year will have far more impact on a potential deal.
For the record I don't think he's going anywhere unless the Flames want a worse player who's signed to more term for more money like David Clarkson.
|
Pretty much agree with this. A team will have to believe they can get Wideman to step up and become an offensive threat for them. Without that beliefe no one is going to touch him unless the Flames cough up a good asset along with him.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 PM.
|
|