Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-19-2016, 08:24 AM   #381
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse View Post
...I just realized that it's almost inevitable that Oilers will pick either Laine or Puljujarvi, because they need wingers.
I think they will pick a winger... but not for the reason you think.

They need defensemen more then they need forwards. Honestly, I think that if the Oilers win any of the draft lotto picks they ought to trade down to 4 and pick Chychrun. But they're the Oilers and the Oilers just can't resist chasing that shiny red ball.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2016, 09:07 AM   #382
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
I think they will pick a winger... but not for the reason you think.

They need defensemen more then they need forwards. Honestly, I think that if the Oilers win any of the draft lotto picks they ought to trade down to 4 and pick Chychrun. But they're the Oilers and the Oilers just can't resist chasing that shiny red ball.
If they win a lotto pick they'd be better off trading it for an established defense man.

Or taking one of the forwards, and trading Draisaitl or RNH for an established D.

The Oilers can't really afford to wait on a just drafted defenseman, and there doesn't appear to be a Doughty in this draft that can step in and be solid.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 09:25 AM   #383
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Flames need Laine all day long out of this draft. even at #1. Yeah call me crazy. I don't really care. A RH pure shooter like that with size? But then I look at Puljujarvi, and he scores those dirty goals. And that speed is something else. Ah man. What a top 3.
I think if the Flames win the lottery, they should seriously consider trading down to #2 or #3. I know, BPA and all that. But taking Matthews would be a clear signal to Monahan or Bennet that they don't have a long-term future with the team. Those guys aren't going to want to be shifted to the wing. And a small-market team in the U.S. like Buffalo or Columbus would be all over the superstar American centre.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 09:33 AM   #384
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I don't think it would be the end of Bennett, he's playing wing right now and having a line with 2 amazing centers on it wouldn't be that bad. It's easier to convert a center to wing then anyone else to a center.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 09:40 AM   #385
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

CSS midterm rankings are out:

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=797902
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2016, 09:40 AM   #386
browntrout
Crash and Bang Winger
 
browntrout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
I think if the Flames win the lottery, they should seriously consider trading down to #2 or #3. I know, BPA and all that. But taking Matthews would be a clear signal to Monahan or Bennet that they don't have a long-term future with the team. Those guys aren't going to want to be shifted to the wing. And a small-market team in the U.S. like Buffalo or Columbus would be all over the superstar American centre.
I don't think flames management cares if monahan or bennets feeling are hurt if they are lucky enough to draft matthews. Calgary has never drafted first overall and buffalo just drafted Eichel.....so remind me again why Buffalo or columbus deserves matthews over calgary.
browntrout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 09:41 AM   #387
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
I'm hoping that when McDavid gets back that they magically take off and push for a playoff spot. Them getting one of the top 3 picks would tick me off. They might actually suck their way to a decent team.

As for the Flames, I'd be happy with any of the top 9 guys.
I think they will. McDavid makes them better - no question. I think they go on a bit of a run when he's back.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 12:22 PM   #388
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
I think they will. McDavid makes them better - no question. I think they go on a bit of a run when he's back.
Maybe enough of a run to make them pick out of the top 9.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2016, 12:28 PM   #389
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
I think they will. McDavid makes them better - no question. I think they go on a bit of a run when he's back.
Yeah I think they will pass the Flames in the standings but they would have to go on a serious run to legitimately get into the playoff race. The team still stinks but they aren't nearly the train wreck they were under the previous regime.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 12:29 PM   #390
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
I'm hoping that when McDavid gets back that they magically take off and push for a playoff spot. Them getting one of the top 3 picks would tick me off. They might actually suck their way to a decent team.

As for the Flames, I'd be happy with any of the top 9 guys.
They're missing Klefbom more than they're missing McDavid, simply because the next step down from McDavid was Draisaitl/RNH while the next step down from Klefbom was a bunch of #3/#4/#5s
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 12:37 PM   #391
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

There are about 10 solid guys this draft that I would be happy if the Flames drafted - slightly more than in past years. Heck, even Gauthier looks like something the Flames desperately need.

This draft is full of prospects that the Flames can really use - Mathews included. Nothing wrong with drafting him and keeping Bennett on the wing. I am not too concerned with the Flames 'having' to finish in the bottom 3 or 5. It seems that they will finish somewhere in the bottom 10 this year, and I think that is enough to fill a big hole. However, we can never seem to count out the Flames, and they may yet surprise us again. Who would have thought that they would best their record at home for straight wins after the start they had?

I don't mind Nylander - I liked his brother a whole lot at the draft as well. I think there are more pressing options to choose from, and I can see the Flames skipping Nylander for a larger prospect, but I would be happy with Nylander.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2016, 12:44 PM   #392
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
They're missing Klefbom more than they're missing McDavid, simply because the next step down from McDavid was Draisaitl/RNH while the next step down from Klefbom was a bunch of #3/#4/#5s
Klefbom is a #3/#4/#5
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2016, 12:44 PM   #393
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
CSS midterm rankings are out:

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=797902
Look at the size of these kids!

Top 10 NA has Nylander at slightly over 6'0, the diminutive Keller and then most of them are 6'2+ already!

Top 10 EU has five guys 6'2+.

Frankly the top 15 is looking solid at this point. If we miss the playoffs we should be able to add size up front or size on the backend. This year is looking decidedly above average to me, I wonder what the buzz will be like closer to the draft?
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2016, 01:00 PM   #394
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Klefbom is a #3/#4/#5
He is actually pretty good, especially considering he plays with no other defenseman that are any good. No way is he a #4/#5 at this point.

On a decent team he is probably a #2, would be a #3 on a really good team.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 07:51 PM   #395
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

So as it looks right now Flames will have a greater than 50% chance at the 5th or 6th pick (before lottery) if they go .500 for the rest of the season.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2016, 07:57 PM   #396
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
He is actually pretty good, especially considering he plays with no other defenseman that are any good. No way is he a #4/#5 at this point.

On a decent team he is probably a #2, would be a #3 on a really good team.
On no decent team is he a #2... someday maybe, but not right now
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 01-19-2016, 07:58 PM   #397
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
So as it looks right now Flames will have a greater than 50% chance at the 5th or 6th pick (before lottery) if they go .500 for the rest of the season.
I think we have to consider that Russell, Hudler, and possibly more players will be moved at the deadline leading to AHL call ups and I hate to use the tank term but it's kind of what this team did in 2013.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 08:58 PM   #398
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina View Post
I think they will. McDavid makes them better - no question. I think they go on a bit of a run when he's back.
I don't think any of us will be surprised if they do the opposite, they seem to be sitting nicely on the fence as usual.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 09:25 PM   #399
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
I wonder if the Flames or any other team that's picking #1 or #2 will try to pull a Burke and grab both Puljujarvi and Laine like he did with the Sedins.
Don't think it will be possible at all. Part of the reason Burke could pick up that top 4 pick was because it was a weak draft. I mean Stefan #1? Brendl #4? What a crappy draft. Look at the whole 1st round if you want, it was blah.

This draft on the other hand looks sensational at the top end. No team in their right mind who is lucky enough to win the lottery and draft top 3 will be trading that pick.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 09:41 PM   #400
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

My early rankings considering Flames style of drafting and needs.

#1 - Auston Matthews (C) - Franchise centre
#2 - Patrick Laine (RW) - Big, fast, strong sniper and playmaker. 40+ goal type shot
#3 - Jesse Puljujarvi (RW) - Gamebreaking speed and offensive ability
#4 - Matthew Tkachuk (LW) - Smart and skilled power forward who owns the space around the net
#5 - Jacob Chychrun (D)
#6 - Olli Juolevi (D)
#7 - Mikhail Sergachev (D)
#8 - Alex Nylander (W)
#9 - Julien Gauthier (RW)
#10 - Michael McCleod (C)

The top 4 guys are all 1st line talents IMO. Different styles of players. We obviously could use a RW (Laine or Puljujarvi). Matthews is too good to turn down and definitely has a higher upside than Monahan. Tkachuk is a 1st line power forward, a super rare commodity as well. We desperately could use the size, skill, strength combo of any of those wingers.

I think Treliving as a former defenseman knows the value of them and wants to build a monster blue line. I think any of Chychrun, Juolevi and Sergachev would compliment our defense and basically give us two pairings of potential top pairing defenders. That would be one of the best in the league. I haven't seen as much of these guys though.

Nylander would be higher up the list for some teams. But average sized, super skilled wingers are lower on my list than big skilled wingers, franchise centres, and potential top pairing d-men. For this reason I have him lower. Any team that emphasizes pure skill over all other attributes might have him higher (EDM comes to mind.)

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 01-19-2016 at 09:54 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
2016 nhl draft , nhl draft , nhl entry draft


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy