Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2016, 10:07 AM   #541
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

While I'd love another winger on this team, I'm not sure Drouin is the guy we're really in dire need of. He's basically Gaudreau or Hudler 2.0...a smaller, skilled guy who tends to be more of a playmaker.

Ideally, I'd prefer relatively bigger-bodied pure sniper. Someone who can take advantage of Gaudreau's passes and rack up goals, but not get pushed around when teams like Anaheim come calling in the playoffs. I keep hoping Poirier is that guy, but things haven't gone as smoothly for him this year.

While i think he's far from a bust, Ive never been completely sold on the Drouin. In his draft year, he looked like an Oilers youtube special. Lots of dipsy-doodling around pylons in juniors, but you kind of wondered if that would totally translate into the NHL.
Table 5 is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 10:08 AM   #542
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parallex View Post
i wouldn't. I mean with those guys i see it as your classic floor vs. Ceiling argument. Kylington has the highest ceiling and lowest floor, hickey the highest floor but lowest ceiling, and andersson somewhere between the two. Which one someone were to consider "ahead" is entirely down to your risk tolerance.
fyp
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2016, 10:08 AM   #543
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

I'm just responding to the strange position that was circulating earlier in this thread that trading Kylington for Drouin was somehow a bad idea.
Tinordi is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 10:09 AM   #544
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
You aren't getting Drouin for Kylington, not unless Tampa had him rated really high on their draft board and even then, you'd still need to add.
I can't speak for everyone, but in my own thoughts about constructing a deal for Drouin to include one of the Flames top three defense prospects, I have always maintained that any such deal would also need to include a roster player and a pick.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2016, 10:12 AM   #545
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
The always overated 2nd round pick is what would push you over the edge to consider!

A 60th pick overall hold basically zero real value.

The continued over-rating of draft picks always amuses me!
First of all the Lightning's 2nd round pick would not be 60. 2nd of all if a 60th pick has zero value does the 104th pick have negative value because that's where the Flames picked Johnny Gaudreau. All picks in the draft hold value and it's simply up to the teams making the picks to find the diamonds in the rough with the later picks and it's not like all the elite players in the league were 1st round picks as many were taken in the 2nd round.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 10:12 AM   #546
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

I would give up anything outside of the Gaudreau, Bennett, Monahan, Brodie, Hamilton Giordano group.

Yes that means our 1st. No, we're not getting 1st overall. We're not going to be in the bottom 5. C'mon. Look at how Gio is playing, and how Brodie is playing.

However I don't think Tampa would like what we have to offer, other teams probably have nicer pieces that are expendable.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 10:36 AM   #547
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
I would give up anything outside of the Gaudreau, Bennett, Monahan, Brodie, Hamilton Giordano group.

Yes that means our 1st. No, we're not getting 1st overall. We're not going to be in the bottom 5. C'mon. Look at how Gio is playing, and how Brodie is playing.

However I don't think Tampa would like what we have to offer, other teams probably have nicer pieces that are expendable.
We could easily win the lottery if we don't make the playoffs. Maybe not 1 OA, but top 3 is a definite possibility. In any event, if we don't make the playoffs and don't win the lotto, it still likely a top 10 pick, probably higher.

I would only trade our 2016-1st straight up for Drouin, no add-ons (well maybe Russell or something). it would also have to be top 3 protected. I might consider 2017-1st+Klimchuk. Yzerman will get more from someone more desperate.

The more I think about it, Vancouver should be all over this as they have no A prospects in their system and are about to hit hard times. Too bad Benning is a moron.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2016, 10:44 AM   #548
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
Yes that means our 1st. No, we're not getting 1st overall. We're not going to be in the bottom 5.
I wouldn't bet a lot of money on that.

We're currently the 20th ranked team in the NHL while being only 2 points up on th 26th ranked team. Lot of potential volitility there... combine that with this being the first year where the top 3 picks will be determined by lotto and the odds of drafting in the top 5 is to high to use it as a trade chip. I'd do it if we could have it be lottory protected (ie if we win one of the three draws the pick defers to 2017) but otherwise no.
Parallex is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2016, 10:58 AM   #549
Hackey
Franchise Player
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Ya with three lottery draws now I'd be curious to see the probability of moving up in the draft. Odds that you draw one of those three balls. Someone good at math should figure it out. Seems like if Flames were in that 6-8 range the odds might not be great but good enough you wouldn't want some other team having the opportunity. Even if its 1/10 that seems pretty nice to potentially have a top 3 pick. Thats a superstar.
Hackey is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:07 AM   #550
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

All the posters worried about the Flames trading their 1st and it is a lottery pick don't have to be so concerned. Treliving could put protection on the pick which allows the Flames to choose this year or next.

I trade any prospect (don't see the Lightning even having interest in Gillies) or pick and any roster player outside the core 6 for Drouin. He has elite potential and gives us 4 forwards aged 19-22 that can be major impact players.
Vinny01 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2016, 11:13 AM   #551
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
All the posters worried about the Flames trading their 1st and it is a lottery pick don't have to be so concerned. Treliving could put protection on the pick which allows the Flames to choose this year or next.

I trade any prospect (don't see the Lightning even having interest in Gillies) or pick and any roster player outside the core 6 for Drouin. He has elite potential and gives us 4 forwards aged 19-22 that can be major impact players.
That might be enough to kill any potential deal. All it would take is another team willing to not put that condition in.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:14 AM   #552
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
That might be enough to kill any potential deal. All it would take is another team willing to not put that condition in.
Potentially yes so if a team that is on the bubble wants to roll the dice so be it.
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:19 AM   #553
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
The always overated 2nd round pick is what would push you over the edge to consider!

A 60th pick overall hold basically zero real value.

The continued over-rating of draft picks always amuses me!
Yea who needs a second round pick... or even an extra one.

It's not like you could potentially parlay them into a deal for a player like Dougie Hamilton or anything.

Good thing those second round pics we had last year basically held zero value.
GoJetsGo is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:20 AM   #554
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

We are a Johnny Gaudreau injury away from a potential first overall pick... Keep the pick
442scotty is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 442scotty For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2016, 11:26 AM   #555
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
First of all the Lightning's 2nd round pick would not be 60. 2nd of all if a 60th pick has zero value does the 104th pick have negative value because that's where the Flames picked Johnny Gaudreau.
If the lightning got Gio their pick would probably end up around 60th.

The odds of a 2nd rounder playing over 50 games in their career is around 40%

http://www.tsn.ca/playing-the-percen...draft-1.206144

However, lower 2nd rounder are even worst.

Here is another analysis using 150 games

http://www.milehighhockey.com/2014/7...ft-percentages

And no a 3rd rounder doesn't have a negative value. Sure 1/1000 you get a Johnny, but 99% of the time you get at best a bottom 6 forward bottom 2 D role player.

The fact that adding in a low 2nd rounder would swing the trade including our captain is crazy. Heck we got a 2nd and 3rd for Glencross last season who could barely make either teams roster and is now out of hockey.

2nd rounder (Especially in the late 2nd) are the most overrated asset by fans in the league, both in trading and receiving.
Jason14h is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:27 AM   #556
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
It's not like you could potentially parlay them into a deal for a player like Dougie Hamilton or anything.

Good thing those second round pics we had last year basically held zero value.
Right cause the inclusion of the 15th overall had nothing to do with that trade. Look at my stats above. Sure 2nd have value, but to say a 2nd rounder would be the swing decider in trading Gio
Jason14h is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:29 AM   #557
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

so the later the pick, the less value it has. Johnny Hockey must be worthless! Maybe Johnny's playing so well because the pick used to get him held negative value and he's just trying to pay the Flames back.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:32 AM   #558
EuKnoLikeMonny
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Accross from the Dome
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
While I'd love another winger on this team, I'm not sure Drouin is the guy we're really in dire need of. He's basically Gaudreau or Hudler 2.0...a smaller, skilled guy who tends to be more of a playmaker.

Ideally, I'd prefer relatively bigger-bodied pure sniper. Someone who can take advantage of Gaudreau's passes and rack up goals, but not get pushed around when teams like Anaheim come calling in the playoffs. I keep hoping Poirier is that guy, but things haven't gone as smoothly for him this year.

While i think he's far from a bust, Ive never been completely sold on the Drouin. In his draft year, he looked like an Oilers youtube special. Lots of dipsy-doodling around pylons in juniors, but you kind of wondered if that would totally translate into the NHL.
Sounds like you're describing Okposo!
EuKnoLikeMonny is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:39 AM   #559
Two Fivenagame
First Line Centre
 
Two Fivenagame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MOD EDIT: NO
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
We are a Johnny Gaudreau injury away from a potential first overall pick... Keep the pick
Or even a Kari Ramo injury away
Two Fivenagame is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 11:44 AM   #560
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Ya with three lottery draws now I'd be curious to see the probability of moving up in the draft. Odds that you draw one of those three balls. Someone good at math should figure it out. Seems like if Flames were in that 6-8 range the odds might not be great but good enough you wouldn't want some other team having the opportunity. Even if its 1/10 that seems pretty nice to potentially have a top 3 pick. Thats a superstar.
Using my quick math, if we're the 6th worst team in the NHL, our odds of picking in the top 3 is around 21% going into the draft.

Once the first ball is picked, that 21% can go either higher or lower depending on which team gets first and then second.

For comparison, the worst team in the NHL (so the Oilers), have a 51% chance of NOT drafting top 3.
_Q_ is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy