Al_jazeera showing video of OBL/Al-Queda planning 9/11

[transplant99]

Watching CNN and they have just shown a video that was released to Al Jazeera that purports to show the AQ leaders planning the attacks of 5 years ago.

Rather eerie if this in fact a pre-attack video. Chilling actually.

[Azure]

I thought that no evidence exited that would prove Al Queda was behind 9/11?

[transplant99]

They have just shown more of it. Unreal.

On it, two of the hijackers that died that day, are sitting and reading from some papers, while in the background is an artists depiction of the WTC an airplane and explosions/fire of the WTC burning. Also a clear picture of the Pentagon is shown behind them.

Kind of hurts the whole "government did it", "penatgon was hit by a missile", the WTC was imploded" theories, when two of the guys on the tape were on the planes that crashed that day....with there targets behind them for all to see.

They called it "Martyrs ofthe Manhatten Raid", or something along those lines.

They are guessing that OBL has held onto this tape for 5 years on purpose to celebrate the 5 year anniversary. Twisted SOB.

[Looger]

so - was this before the CIA met bin laden in 2001 or after?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanista...584445,00.html

Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.
The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere.

i'm confused. why hasn't he been indicted by the FBI for the attacks, if it took 3 months for them to do it after the embassy bombings?

and why were US intelligence officials meeting with him in a hospital in dubai?

why does ANYONE believe ANY of this crap?

[Looger]

Originally Posted by Azure

I thought that no evidence exited that would prove Al Queda was behind 9/11?

no evidence according to the FBI.

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.

...

Poster Revised November 2001

[Looger]

funny, the US doesn't seem to be looking for bin laden at all.

sources:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/04/wa...bb9d22&ei=5088

C.I.A. Closes Unit Focused on Capture of bin Laden

By MARK MAZZETTI
Published: July 4, 2006
WASHINGTON, July 3 — The Central Intelligence Agency has closed a unit that for a decade had the mission of hunting Osama bin Laden and his top lieutenants, intelligence officials confirmed Monday.

buzzy krongard, whose connections with 9/11 insider trading are strongly suspected in some circles, says we should just back off him...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...431539,00.html

THE world may be better off if Osama Bin Laden remains at large, according to the Central Intelligence Agency’s recently departed executive director.
If the world’s most wanted terrorist is captured or killed, a power struggle among his Al-Qaeda subordinates may trigger a wave of terror attacks, said AB “Buzzy” Krongard, who stepped down six weeks ago as the CIA’s third most senior executive.

unreal, greatest criminal perhaps ever in american history, and the 'letter companies' just don't care. interesting.

[transplant99]

why does ANYONE believe ANY of this crap?

Why do you believe a French newspaper?

i'm confused. why hasn't he been indicted by the FBI for the attacks

Ummm...the FBI doesn't idict anybody for anything....ever.

That's the job of District Attorney's or moreso in this case i believe, the Attorney General to do.

Im curious....do you not believe that Al-Queda/OBL were behind the atrocities of Sept. 11, 2001?

[Looger]

Originally Posted by transplant99

Why do you believe a French newspaper?

why do you believe a canadian one? an american one?

i believe that the majority of published reports are the truth, but not the whole truth. most significant things get reported, somewhere.

when american papers report that ahmedenajad is frothing at the mouth, they leave out the ten most recent statements from israeli and american statesmen threatening iran. truth, whole truth.

Originally Posted by transplant99

Ummm...the FBI doesn't idict anybody for anything....ever.

That's the job of District Attorney's or moreso in this case i believe, the Attorney General to do.

so why hasn't that happened? i'd bet because due process would reveal they have NOTHING on him, and any impartial judge would laugh their case out of court.

Originally Posted by transplant99

Im curious....do you not believe that Al-Queda/OBL were behind the atrocities of Sept. 11, 2001?

i believe that al-CIA-da was involved in that it's always been directed by the american intelligence establishment.

[Frank the Tank]

I'm curious Looger. Do you think crazy people actually know that they are crazy?

[transplant99]

so why hasn't that happened? i'd bet because due process would reveal they have NOTHING on him, and any impartial judge would laugh their case out of court.

Nothing on him?...What?

He has admitted his involvement and that of his co-horts for 5 years now.

WHat else would convince you?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1708091.stm

http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/nation...age041029.html

i believe that al-CIA-da was involved in that it's always been directed by the american intelligence establishment.

Now if this was true...why wouldnt he say as much?

[Looger]

Originally Posted by Frank the Tank

I'm curious Looger. Do you think crazy people actually know that they are crazy?

i'm curious.

do stupid sheep know they're stupid sheep?

[Frank the Tank]

Haha! I have ESP!! SWEEEET!!

[Looger]

Originally Posted by transplant99

Nothing on him?...What?

He has admitted his involvement and that of his co-horts for 5 years now.

the case has never been made.

colin powell mentioned a white paper that would be made available to everyone, something like 4 years and ten months ago, and it has never been produced.

the case has never been made, plain and simple.

the hijackers/dupes/oswalds have been reported at defence language schools, FBI safe houses, they've been protected by the diplomatic services despite being on watch lists, FBI agents has been taken off their trails. this is all published, this is all out there. a 'case' would bring it all out.

[transplant99]

Originally Posted by Looger

the case has never been made.

colin powell mentioned a white paper that would be made available to everyone, something like 4 years and ten months ago, and it has never been produced.

the case has never been made, plain and simple.

the hijackers/dupes/oswalds have been reported at defence language schools, FBI safe houses, they've been protected by the diplomatic services despite being on watch lists, FBI agents has been taken off their trails. this is all published, this is all out there. a 'case' would bring it all out.

Ummmm...yeah...OK

So what about him admitting he did it, and now a tape showing him and others planning it before it happened.

Evidence or not?

[White Doors]

In before he takes his ball and goes home

[Looger]

Originally Posted by transplant99

Ummmm...yeah...OK

So what about him admitting he did it, and now a tape showing him and others planning it before it happened.

Evidence or not?

well it's proof in the court of sheeple public opinion, that's all that seems to matter here.

it's only evidence if you immediately accept that al-quaeda pulled the whole thing off.

i can picture that phone call:

"hey NORAD, it's al-quaeda. could you stand down for an hour and a half this morning, for the first time in over forty years? thanks."

[Looger]

Originally Posted by White Doors

In before he takes his ball and goes home

got anything to add?

get on with it.

entering the debate, or are you going to prove to everyone here how ignorant and childish you really are?

[arsenal]

Originally Posted by Looger

the hijackers/dupes/oswalds have been reported at defence language schools, FBI safe houses, they've been protected by the diplomatic services despite being on watch lists, FBI agents has been taken off their trails. this is all published, this is all out there. a 'case' would bring it all out.

Do you have the evidence and links to back that up?

[transplant99]

so......if i understand correctly.

I am a "sheep" if I believe that a man who had tried to (unsuccessfully) blow up the WTC on a previous occassion, realeased a tape saying he was behind the successful attempt, and also furnished a tape of himself and those known to have been on the plane that struck the WTC...planning said attacks and showing footage of how to overtake people to do so?

That about right?


Then here I am.

[Cowperson]

Originally Posted by transplant99

so......if i understand correctly.

I am a "sheep" if I believe that a man who had tried to (unsuccessfully) blow up the WTC on a previous occassion, realeased a tape saying he was behind the successful attempt, and also furnished a tape of himself and those known to have been on the plane that struck the WTC...planning said attacks and showing footage of how to overtake people to do so?

That about right?


Then here I am.

You look good . . . . . watch out, that's Looger coming up behind you!!!

Cowperson