10-14-2015, 11:31 AM
|
#3461
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering
What makes you think Jason Kenney would be an upgrade on Harper?
Or do you think the Conservatives could select a 'progressive' leader?
|
Conservative minority with a subsequent leadership change is my ideal outcome as well.
I would hope that the go with a more centrist leader that would implement more prudent fiscal policies along with a liberalization on the social side.
Brad Wall would be a good option but I'm not sure if he speaks French.
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:37 AM
|
#3462
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Price will probably stay the same or go down. If you increase the price then you maintain the criminal element since blackmarketeers will still have significant profit avenues. Basically you want to set it at a price point where smuggling isn't profitable enough to offset risk.
|
No it won't. Price will go up. Dramatically.
It will be taxed and taxed heavily. It's hard to really compare pricing since there's so many variables but for example, a quarter of legal weed in Colorado costs anywhere from $50 - $105 with the average price in Denver being $75 and the average in the Mountain corridor being $96.
A quarter in Calgary currently is $60.
If having cheaper weed is your goal, than you should be heavily against legalization. Think about Alcohol and Smokes. They increase exponentially in price every time the government looks to increase tax revenue.
Will there be a blackmarket for cheap weed? Maybe at first but it will go away once more and more people who start smoking weed never go to a dealer. Think about it. When is the last time you or anyone you know of age bought blackmarket booze or smokes to save money? If you had only started to smoke after legalization would you seek out a dealer to save 10 or 20 bucks or just suck it up and go to 7-11?
Legalization will up the price, eliminate most of the criminal element and increase the quality of the product.
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:41 AM
|
#3464
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
No it won't. Price will go up. Dramatically.
It will be taxed and taxed heavily. It's hard to really compare pricing since there's so many variables but for example, a quarter of legal weed in Colorado costs anywhere from $50 - $105 with the average price in Denver being $75 and the average in the Mountain corridor being $96.
A quarter in Calgary currently is $60.
If having cheaper weed is your goal, than you should be heavily against legalization. Think about Alcohol and Smokes. They increase exponentially in price every time the government looks to increase tax revenue.
Will there be a blackmarket for cheap weed? Maybe at first but it will go away once more and more people who start smoking weed never go to a dealer. Think about it. When is the last time you or anyone you know of age bought blackmarket booze or smokes to save money? If you had only started to smoke after legalization would you seek out a dealer to save 10 or 20 bucks or just suck it up and go to 7-11?
Legalization will up the price, eliminate most of the criminal element and increase the quality of the product.
|
And what was the price before? There are some insanely high weed prices in the US in non-legalized states. I'm not saying you're wrong and that the price won't go up. I'm just saying you can't compare our current prices to Colorado's legalized prices without knowing the pricing prior.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:44 AM
|
#3465
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
This could very well be why I don't really care about fiscal policies. As a single, childless male, making under $45k/year, who does not belong to a visible minority, nor owns a home he will be renovating, there is dick all for me in any of three fiscal platforms. Well except the Greens, who are promising to wipe my student down the line. So it makes a lot more sense for someone like me to focus on social issues.
|
But social issues are still all economics and fiscal policy, by extension.
Where are we getting the money from?
How many dollars are there?
Where are we allocating it?
It always comes down to the money.
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:44 AM
|
#3466
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
No it won't. Price will go up. Dramatically.
It will be taxed and taxed heavily. It's hard to really compare pricing since there's so many variables but for example, a quarter of legal weed in Colorado costs anywhere from $50 - $105 with the average price in Denver being $75 and the average in the Mountain corridor being $96.
A quarter in Calgary currently is $60.
If having cheaper weed is your goal, than you should be heavily against legalization. Think about Alcohol and Smokes. They increase exponentially in price every time the government looks to increase tax revenue.
Will there be a blackmarket for cheap weed? Maybe at first but it will go away once more and more people who start smoking weed never go to a dealer. Think about it. When is the last time you or anyone you know of age bought blackmarket booze or smokes to save money? If you had only started to smoke after legalization would you seek out a dealer to save 10 or 20 bucks or just suck it up and go to 7-11?
Legalization will up the price, eliminate most of the criminal element and increase the quality of the product.
|
You can currently get a quarter for $55 at the dispensaries here in Victoria. Now obviously that's not currently being taxed, so it's likely to go up, but I don't think you'll be seeing $100 quarters anytime soon.
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:46 AM
|
#3467
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
But social issues are still all economics and fiscal policy, by extension.
Where are we getting the money from?
How many dollars are there?
Where are we allocating it?
It always comes down to the money.
|
Totally, but maybe that's why I'm not really concerned about tax cuts and things like TFSA going away in favour of social programs, because they're not things that benefit me. Mind you, neither do most of the social programs I'd like to see funded, so who knows. I generally dislike people so I'm trying to figure out where my streak of altruism comes from and if it's somehow actually self-interest.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:48 AM
|
#3468
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Totally, but maybe that's why I'm not really concerned about tax cuts and things like TFSA going away in favour of social programs, because they're not things that benefit me. Mind you, neither do most of the social programs I'd like to see funded, so who knows. I generally dislike people so I'm trying to figure out where my streak of altruism comes from and if it's somehow actually self-interest.
|
haha outstanding
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:50 AM
|
#3469
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
And what was the price before? There are some insanely high weed prices in the US in non-legalized states. I'm not saying you're wrong and that the price won't go up. I'm just saying you can't compare our current prices to Colorado's legalized prices without knowing the pricing prior.
|
It will probably go up a little. It will have to stay low enough to convince people to stay out of the black market, but buying from a safe and reliable source will be worth a slight mark-up to most people.
An eventual mark-up in price would be great for keeping pot from more young people as well.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:52 AM
|
#3470
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
It will probably go up a little. It will have to stay low enough to convince people to stay out of the black market, but buying from a safe and reliable source will be worth a slight mark-up to most people.
An eventual mark-up in price would be great for keeping pot from more young people as well.
|
It would be worth a slight mark-up, I agree. However, you're also eliminating the vast majority of the "danger pay" from it. Large grow ops grow it (either government or private, hopefully private) and sell it in bulk right to the distributors. I'm betting prices stay pretty much the same, varying by strain potency or rareness.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:54 AM
|
#3471
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
The name I've seen mentioned a few times as possibility for next CPC leader is a name from the PC era: Jean Charest. Definitely a more moderate choice, though I wonder if he can get enough support from the current base to become leader.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:54 AM
|
#3472
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
You know what they say about desperate times. Mulcair is now in favour or legalization, despite only being in favour of decriminalization a month ago, and being against decriminalization when he ran for the NDP leadership.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cana...tion-1.3269664
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 11:58 AM
|
#3473
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Totally, but maybe that's why I'm not really concerned about tax cuts and things like TFSA going away in favour of social programs, because they're not things that benefit me. Mind you, neither do most of the social programs I'd like to see funded, so who knows. I generally dislike people so I'm trying to figure out where my streak of altruism comes from and if it's somehow actually self-interest.
|
Agreed with Eldrick, this is hilarious.
But I also think there's truth to it. I'm probably going to get flamed, but I'm sure people think I'm a Utopian socialist already so here it is:
It is selfish. It's rooted in the will to survive. Some people's will to survive is still rooted in money, because it's what we need to buy the things we need to survive. But I (and I think many in our age range) actually see the potential for life to end (or at least become terrifyingly difficult) if significant changes aren't made in the way we all live. Unfortunately, policy changes in Canada are not enough to complete global change that we need, but I do think that's where that impulse comes from. 50 year olds care about their next 20 years, which is "I need enough money to retire in relative comfort". We care about our next 70, which is "Holy f***, depleting resources with money grubbers blocking actual change. Holy s*** you mean we can use these renewable things and have tech available now but we just don't?" "Holy christ, it may sound crazy but I legitimately think humanity could take a serious hit in my lifetime without doing something about this stuff."
__________________
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 12:04 PM
|
#3474
|
UnModerator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
The name I've seen mentioned a few times as possibility for next CPC leader is a name from the PC era: Jean Charest. Definitely a more moderate choice, though I wonder if he can get enough support from the current base to become leader.
|
If he becomes leader, I think we see a CA/Reform split.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKOCPHL Ottawa Vancouver
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 12:06 PM
|
#3475
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
The name I've seen mentioned a few times as possibility for next CPC leader is a name from the PC era: Jean Charest. Definitely a more moderate choice, though I wonder if he can get enough support from the current base to become leader.
|
I lean towards believing that the old Reform Party faction hold the balance of power within the Party. I'd enjoy watching a leadership race unfold. It could get ugly if there were to be enough support for a moderate/progressive candidate to win the leadership.
Would the Reformers pack up and restart their own Party again?
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 12:11 PM
|
#3476
|
First Line Centre
|
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamer
Even though he says he only wanted steak and potatoes, he was aware of all the rapes.
|
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 12:16 PM
|
#3477
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by V
So Justin wants to get rid of UCCB, income splitting and the increased TSFA limits? Ouch, that's three things that hurt me directly. I thought I was middle class, and Justin's saying he wants to help the middle class, but I'm having a hard time understanding how he's trying to help me.
|
This. Exactly this. You arent the only one.
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 12:17 PM
|
#3478
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86
If he becomes leader, I think we see a CA/Reform split.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering
I lean towards believing that the old Reform Party faction hold the balance of power within the Party. I'd enjoy watching a leadership race unfold. It could get ugly if there were to be enough support for a moderate/progressive candidate to win the leadership.
Would the Reformers pack up and restart their own Party again?
|
I doubt it. When you really step back and look this CPC is absolutely nothing like the Reform Party. It has completely abandoned everything they were fighting for, and represents that openness and accountability angle in name only.
|
|
|
10-14-2015, 12:18 PM
|
#3479
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy City
I mean can you even imagine...free drugs, safe injections sites, brothels. Harper is seriously concerned for Canadians.
"Justin [Trudeau] refuses to acknowledge the damage that drugs do to families and communities," Harper, referring to the Liberal leader, said in a written statement from his office.
"He wants to allow the sale of marijuana in corner stores and increase the number of heroin injection sites, dangerously misguided policies that would only make drugs more accessible to our children."
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...jabi-1.3268011
|
That is not what is claimed in Chinese... It's claimed in the ad that Liberals want to sell pot to kids and open brothels in neighbourhoods. A blatant and outright lie.
What is particularly insulting from all this is it only appears in Chinese and Punjabi newspapers. It really shows how horrible the mindset of CPC campaigners are to think that there is no need refine the lie at all as these ethnicities are easily fooled and clearly ignorant. Then again, given what the CPC position is on "new stock" Canadians I can't say I am horribly surprised by this.
Last edited by FlameOn; 10-14-2015 at 12:26 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameOn For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-14-2015, 12:21 PM
|
#3480
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
And what was the price before? There are some insanely high weed prices in the US in non-legalized states. I'm not saying you're wrong and that the price won't go up. I'm just saying you can't compare our current prices to Colorado's legalized prices without knowing the pricing prior.
|
Yeah it's hard to find a number but one article I found said black market weed was going for $40 bucks for an eighth (omg) and the legal equivilant goes for $60-$70 depending on the dispensary.
Sorry, I'm looking up the articles on my phone since I obviously don't want that on my work computer
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 AM.
|
|