08-10-2015, 09:43 AM
|
#41
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy City
I'm not arguing that it's not right, it's obviously illegal. But this reporter seems to want to start a witch hunt for the guy, which I think is excessive.
|
What, in your opinion, would be an appropriate response?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
To be clear, this was not sexual harassment, though it may have been sexual assault - whether this counts as "applying force" to the reporter in a manner that violated her sexual integrity. I don't know the case law on what the standard is there (apparently a bunch of contextual factors come into play in determining this).
|
That's exactly what I said. It's sexual assault. If you just go to a bar any given Friday you'll see it happen dozens of times. Lots of people have no idea what they're doing is criminal.
Quote:
|
If I can answer for him - filing the complaint with police and doing nothing further
|
Yeah. That's what happened. CBC chose to cover this in a story.
Quote:
|
If this guy is found and his life is destroyed for doing something stupid while drun at a concert, that will be the worst thing by far that happened here.
|
I'm ok with that if people learn what sexual assault is and act accordingly while drunk at a concert.
Last edited by OMG!WTF!; 08-10-2015 at 09:50 AM.
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 09:45 AM
|
#42
|
|
Franchise Player
|
If I can answer for him - filing the complaint with police and doing nothing further. If this guy is found by a frenzied internet mob and his life is publicly destroyed for doing something stupid while drunk at a concert, that will be the worst thing by far that happened here.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 09:50 AM
|
#43
|
|
Looooooooooooooch
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
What, in your opinion, would be an appropriate response?
|
Anything other than asking him to be publicly identified.
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 09:51 AM
|
#44
|
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
You should never underestimate the power of
A kiss on the neck, when she doesn't expect
A kiss on the neck, when she doesn't expect
A kiss on the neck
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 09:51 AM
|
#45
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
What, in your opinion, would be an appropriate response?
|
Laugh it off as the joke it was?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
That's exactly what I said. It's sexual assault. If you just go to a bar any given Friday you'll see it happen dozens of times. Lots of people have no idea what they're doing is criminal.
|
Should I be trying to find every chick who smacked/grabbed my ass at the cowboys tent and press charges?
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 09:54 AM
|
#46
|
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Johnny Depp is in character (and probably staged) so that's ok.
Also 3/85 is a terrible reply.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 09:56 AM
|
#47
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02
Laugh it off as the joke it was?
|
Kind of like laughing off those rapscallions who keyed your car?
Quote:
|
Anything other than asking him to be publicly identified
|
Really? So we, the public, should harbor criminals? Cops use public photogaphy all the time to catch people. Why should this guy be any different?
It is 1970. Yikes.
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 09:57 AM
|
#48
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02
Laugh it off as the joke it was?
Should I be trying to find every chick who smacked/grabbed my ass at the cowboys tent and press charges?
|
It doesn't really matter how someone else would react in a similar situation. We don't know her background or what things might have happened in her life to make this such an unnerving experience. Plus, if you laugh something like that off when it happens on TV, how long until every attention starved jackass is trying to do the same thing?
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:00 AM
|
#49
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
People in broadcasting will tell you bystanders have always done stupid stuff around TV cameras, but it's happening more and more often these days. Hard to say why. Is it a general lack of self-restraint, or a desperate need to be seen by others?
|
Yeah, but maybe its time to take that stand.
Honestly, people doping stupid crap in front of cameras is nothing new, there are whole television shows dedicated to idiots being idiots on camera, American Idol, Big Brother, Survivor, etc.
But doing stupid crap on the local news has become so commonplace that it appears to have become accepted.
Some reporters probably like it for the publicity or notoriety and some probably hate it because it makes them look foolish and unprofessional, but its happened since the first day reporters decided to go out on the street and talk to people, but if it has to stop then all of it has to stop.
People. They're the worst!
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:01 AM
|
#50
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
Really? So we, the public, should harbor criminals?
|
Good lord. You are completely out of your tree on this. First of all, he's not a criminal as far as I know - hasn't even been charged with anything. Second, if he were charged, it's absolutely not clear that he would be convicted of anything. Third, even if he were clearly guilty, the correct response is not a public tarring and feathering - it's an arrest, charges, due process and a sentence.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:02 AM
|
#51
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Plus, if you laugh something like that off when it happens on TV, how long until every attention starved jackass is trying to do the same thing?
|
Well we've had tv for what 70 years and people have been doing stupid stuff like this on occasion pretty much since it was invented yet it hasn't led to a full scale pandemic yet, so I highly doubt it ever will.
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:02 AM
|
#52
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quincy Egg
Take a look at her twitter. This appears to be an instance where this is clearly done for attention.
|
Go on.
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:06 AM
|
#53
|
|
Looooooooooooooch
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
Really? So we, the public, should harbor criminals? Cops use public photogaphy all the time to catch people. Why should this guy be any different?
It is 1970. Yikes.
|
Because the guy didn't commit a 1st degree murder? Or should we call a SWAT team to his house for this?
There are different levels of crime you know, not all of them involve the same repercussions.
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:10 AM
|
#54
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Not to mention he's not clearly guilty. There's intentionally quite a bit of grey area in the sexual assault provision in the criminal code; it covers everything from maybe stuff like this to rape at knifepoint.
Is someone, realistically, ever going to get charged with sexual assault for something like this? Or as OMGWTF said, the similar behavior that happens in bars all the time? I'd say that in almost every case the answer is "probably not" - I don't know, though, I am neither with the RCMP nor do I practice criminal law.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:13 AM
|
#55
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Good lord. You are completely out of your tree on this. First of all, he's not a criminal as far as I know - hasn't even been charged with anything. Second, if he were charged, it's absolutely not clear that he would be convicted of anything. Third, even if he were clearly guilty, the correct response is not a public tarring and feathering - it's an arrest, charges, due process and a sentence.
|
Public photography happens all the time. None of the people shown front and center in security camera video on the news every night are convicted of anything. That's why it's on the news. The cops are looking for people. CBC has every right to publish the photos in connection to the POSSIBLE crime and investigation. Man, brutal lack of understanding here.
Quote:
|
Is someone, realistically, ever going to get charged with sexual assault for something like this? Or as OMGWTF said, the similar behavior that happens in bars all the time? I'd say that in almost every case the answer is "probably not" - I don't know, though, I am neither with the RCMP nor do I practice criminal law
|
The problem most of the time is not proving the action happened, it's proving consent, or lack there of. Kissing someone on the cheek is not illegal. This however probably is.
Last edited by OMG!WTF!; 08-10-2015 at 10:20 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:20 AM
|
#56
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
I think the worst part of this and all the FHRITP stuff is that they are just out trying to do their jobs. When something like this happens, they are then constantly thrown off balance, maybe watching whoever is around them and distracting them form their job. How would you like it if you were giving a presentation or speech, or talking at a meeting and someone came up and distracted you? I'd be flustered through the rest of it, then probably pissed off that I wasn't able to do my job to the best of my ability.
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:22 AM
|
#57
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF!
The problem most of the time is not proving the action happened, it's proving consent, or lack there of. Kissing someone on the cheek is not illegal. This however probably is.
|
Is it? The best I can get to is "maybe, but I doubt he'd ever be charged". I'd be interested to hear from someone who knows better but on the other hand I've already spent way more energy on this incident than I feel it deserves, so continue your ragegasm, sir.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:25 AM
|
#58
|
|
Franchise Player
|
To some degree, dealing with idiots in public is part of the job of a live reporter. The problem is that women are targeted for this stuff more often than men, and it seems to be increasing in frequency. The poetic justice would be to find out where these idiots work, and then interrupt and publicly embarrass them in front of customers or their boss.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:26 AM
|
#59
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
To some degree, dealing with idiots in public is part of the job of a live reporter. The problem is that women are targeted for this stuff more often than men, and it seems to be increasing in frequency. The poetic justice would be to find out where these idiots work, and then interrupt and publicly embarrass them in front of customers or their boss.
|
Like that idiot in Toronto? Didn't he get fired for yelling FHITP?
|
|
|
|
|
08-10-2015, 10:35 AM
|
#60
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
A kiss on the cheek is sexual assault? Wow I feel bad for her and everyone who thinks so.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SHOGUN For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:52 AM.
|
|
