07-27-2015, 12:53 PM
|
#341
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal
I don't really see how that's possible then. Considering we were at that 3.1 figure of yours before Byron was signed, I think it's more likely the NHLNumbers salary total hasn't been updated yet.
|
It also depends what you mean by cap space. True cap space is 2.2, but that includes bonuses. If you pretend bonuses are achieved, they have $1.47M
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 12:58 PM
|
#342
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal
I don't really see how that's possible then. Considering we were at that 3.1 figure of yours before Byron was signed, I think it's more likely the NHLNumbers salary total hasn't been updated yet.
|
It's not my figure, it's NHLNumbers' figure. And it includes Byron.
They may have it wrong, but that's what they are reporting.
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 01:07 PM
|
#343
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
It's not my figure, it's NHLNumbers' figure. And it includes Byron.
They may have it wrong, but that's what they are reporting.
|
Generalfanager and Capcentral have the Flames with 2.194 of cap space remaining after Byron.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-27-2015, 01:08 PM
|
#344
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Tried this line up in NHL 15 over the weekend. Solid.
Gaudreau-Monahan-Hudler
Bennett-Backlund-Frolik
Ferland-Stajan-Jones
Bouma-Jooris-Colborne
- Bollig
- Byron
Giordano-Brodie
Russell-Hamilton
Wotherspoon-Wideman
- Engelland
Ramo-Ortio
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 01:13 PM
|
#345
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
defense pairings ...
I see the need to keep the Giordano-Brodie and Wideman-Russell pairings together, but with the Hamilton addition and Brodie learning to be the man in the final two months of last season I think you break them up and get to a natural left/right situation.
Giordano - Hamilton
Brodie - Wideman
Russell - Engelland
if Morrison makes the team and shoots right he takes Engelland's spot. If Wotherspoon makes the team in the 6 spot you reassess as he's a lefty over a righty
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-27-2015, 02:08 PM
|
#346
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Generalfanager and Capcentral have the Flames with 2.194 of cap space remaining after Byron.
|
I looked at Hockeyscap.com. I'm too lazy to look up where the difference comes from. What ever the exact figure, making moves to save cap space is going to be a thing for the Flames again.
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 02:12 PM
|
#347
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Hockey's Cap has Bennett listed on the Flames roster, which is why their available cap space is lower than the others.
There's also discrepancy over Granlund's cap hit. NHL Numbers has it at $925,000 and Hockey's Cap and General Fanager have it at $767,500.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-27-2015, 02:20 PM
|
#348
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Giordano - Hamilton
Brodie - Wideman
Russell - Engelland
if Morrison makes the team and shoots right he takes Engelland's spot. If Wotherspoon makes the team in the 6 spot you reassess as he's a lefty over a righty
|
Those are the most logical pairings in my mind. Having Russell on the 3rd pairing over Wideman makes a lot of sense. Not only does it have a lefty and righty, it has a mobile and a rugged player combo.
Nakladal and Morrison would be fighting it out to be the #4 RD spot on the team. Wotherspoon and Smid (if healthy) battles for the #4 LD spot.
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 02:31 PM
|
#349
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
Hockey's Cap has Bennett listed on the Flames roster, which is why their available cap space is lower than the others.
There's also discrepancy over Granlund's cap hit. NHL Numbers has it at $925,000 and Hockey's Cap and General Fanager have it at $767,500.
|
So with Bennett, that's 16 forwards. And Ferland will make 17.
Let's say Ferland gets $1.5M (I think it will be less than that. That would mean the cap space would be about $600k.
But 3 forwards would have to go. Taking the 3 cheapest off (Shore, Byron and Granlund) would save $2.676M
So that puts them at $3.37M or more, depending on who doesn't make the lineup. Obviously, if someone like Raymond is out, that number goes up quite a bit.
If Smid isn't healthy and is replaced by Nakladal or Wotherspoon, that would add another $2.68M or $2.57M respectively.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-27-2015, 02:35 PM
|
#350
|
Franchise Player
|
So with no Smid and no Raymond, we would be looking at about $8M in available space.
If Ortio replaces Hiller or Ramo, you can add another $3.9M or $3.2M respectively.
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 03:12 PM
|
#351
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
|
I count 18 Fwds with a legitimate shot at making the opening day roster, and most are on one way contracts. It seems kind of doubtful to me that many of the fringe guys will attract much interest on the trade market, so I guess we are just going to send a bunch of guys to the minors and if they get claimed so be it?
I am actually fine if that is the plan, but I do wonder what is on BT's mind.
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 03:36 PM
|
#352
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Probably a dumb question, but is the cap space only allotted to those on the active roster? On the site I looked at, the Flames were at $1.2M left, but based on a 25 man roster. If we carry 23 and assuming we don't send down a big cap hit number, is our "actual" cap room somewhere around $3M?
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 03:51 PM
|
#353
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
Probably a dumb question, but is the cap space only allotted to those on the active roster? On the site I looked at, the Flames were at $1.2M left, but based on a 25 man roster. If we carry 23 and assuming we don't send down a big cap hit number, is our "actual" cap room somewhere around $3M?
|
I believe it's all NHL contracts (excluding 2 way deals of not on NHL roster). If you send down a large contract, you only save league minimum. The rest goes on the cap
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 04:38 PM
|
#354
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Can teams still go 10% over the cap limit during the off season? I can see them going into camp right against it and waiving any player who does not make the team if no trade materializes.
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 05:08 PM
|
#355
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
Probably a dumb question, but is the cap space only allotted to those on the active roster? On the site I looked at, the Flames were at $1.2M left, but based on a 25 man roster. If we carry 23 and assuming we don't send down a big cap hit number, is our "actual" cap room somewhere around $3M?
|
Players on two-way deals can be sent down with no cap penalties.
Any player on a one-way contract can be sent down but only a certain amount of his contract won't count against the cap. That number is the league-minimum salary plus $375,000. For 2015-16, the league minimum is $575,000. That means teams can "bury" a maximum of $950,000 for each one-way contract in the AHL. For example, if the Flames were to send Raymond to the AHL, $2.2 million of his salary would still count against the Flames' cap.
To answer your question: Yes, realistically, the Flames have at least $3 million in cap space for a 23 man roster (depending on who those 23 men are).
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Can teams still go 10% over the cap limit during the off season? I can see them going into camp right against it and waiving any player who does not make the team if no trade materializes.
|
Yes, teams can still exceed the cap by 10% during the offseason.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-27-2015, 05:34 PM
|
#356
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Gaudreau - Monahan - Hudler
Colborne - Backlund - Frolik
Ferland - Stajan - Jones
Bouma - Bennett - Jooris
Giordano - Hamilton
Russell - Wideman
Brodie - Engelland
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Alberta_Beef For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-27-2015, 06:06 PM
|
#358
|
Franchise Player
|
A lot of lineup projections show no Smid or no Raymond. Problem is if those guys can't win a job coming out of camp, what do you do with them? I don't see any teams paying a total of $7.6 million for two healthy scratches on the Flames. I suppose you can trade them if you give up prospects or picks alongside but is that we want?
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 06:30 PM
|
#359
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
A lot of lineup projections show no Smid or no Raymond. Problem is if those guys can't win a job coming out of camp, what do you do with them? I don't see any teams paying a total of $7.6 million for two healthy scratches on the Flames. I suppose you can trade them if you give up prospects or picks alongside but is that we want?
|
ARZ has depth issues. Buffalo can take a couple more onto their roster. I'm sure there's more than six teams out there that'll take a couple of 3-4m a year contracts.
|
|
|
07-27-2015, 07:07 PM
|
#360
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
|
So crazy how we went from having a potential problem with the salary floor one year ago to having roughly $3m in cap space today. Luckily there is a huge amount of dollars tied up in players who aren't in the future plans and have contracts expiring within 1-2 years (Stajan in 3).
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:29 AM.
|
|