Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2015, 02:37 PM   #101
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Ugh. The watering down of the NHL continues.
People say that, but every single player on the ice these days I a much better hockey player and much closer on level to the best players than the average NHL 3rd liner was in the 80s when the league was 21 teams.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 02:38 PM   #102
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler View Post
August 12, 2014 - Clippers sold to Steve Balmer for $2B:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybro...-now-official/


June 4, 2014 -Gary Bettman says he has NHL teams worth more than Clippers

http://www.thehockeynews.com/article...-Clippers.html


November 25, 2014 - Forbes NHL valuations:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozan...ms-in-the-nhl/
Did you miss the first paragraph of the Forbes story where it points to the new Rogers TV deal?

So far, you've not shown any evidence of any coorelation. Seems more like the rise is consistent with the changes in NHL revenues.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 05:13 PM   #103
JetsFlamesFan
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
CP lets buy a team.
I have 380 USD i'm willing to contribute
JetsFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 05:17 PM   #104
JetsFlamesFan
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Top 3 according to Bettman:

Chris Johnston @reporterchris
Gary Bettman told the NHL board about interest from ownership groups from Las Vegas, Seattle and Quebec City. There's your big three.
I'm supposed to believe that there is no one in Southern Ontario willing to pay Bettman a billion for an NHL expansion team? Bettman is full of you know what.
JetsFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2015, 10:39 PM   #105
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetsFlamesFan View Post
I'm supposed to believe that there is no one in Southern Ontario willing to pay Bettman a billion for an NHL expansion team? Bettman is full of you know what.
Might be willing to pay a billion total, but the first few hundred million would probably have to go to MLSE, and the sabres would want a big payout. Then you build a new rink, and you're right around the same 500 MM.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 07:48 AM   #106
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetsFlamesFan View Post
I'm supposed to believe that there is no one in Southern Ontario willing to pay Bettman a billion for an NHL expansion team? Bettman is full of you know what.
I don't know why you would believe that given the quoted tweet said absolutely nothing of the sort.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 10:06 AM   #107
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Didn't Seattle shoot down an arena without at least an NBA team?
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 10:08 AM   #108
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

The NBA is obviously the clear end goal, but they've waffled on the NHL at times, likely on the argument that building an arena now for the NHL would increase the odds of the NBA later.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 10:43 AM   #109
ricosuave
Threadkiller
 
ricosuave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W
Exp:
Default

500 million fee? wow.

well, if they can get it from a couple of suckers, why not?
__________________
https://www.reddit.com/r/CalgaryFlames/
I’m always amazed these sportscasters and announcers can call the game with McDavid’s **** in their mouths all the time.
ricosuave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 12:59 PM   #110
JBR
Franchise Player
 
JBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 161 St. - Yankee Stadium
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Might be willing to pay a billion total, but the first few hundred million would probably have to go to MLSE, and the sabres would want a big payout. Then you build a new rink, and you're right around the same 500 MM.

I'm missing the link but didn't Gary Bettman recently state there is nothing on paper that says Toronto or Buffalo are entitled to any form of compensation?
JBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 04:41 PM   #111
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBR View Post
I'm missing the link but didn't Gary Bettman recently state there is nothing on paper that says Toronto or Buffalo are entitled to any form of compensation?
If that's true, then there's 28 other owners who would like to get their $30+ each from a Toronto 2 expansion team. That plus $15 MM from vegas and Murray's got the downpayment on a new arena.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 04:48 PM   #112
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBR View Post
I'm missing the link but didn't Gary Bettman recently state there is nothing on paper that says Toronto or Buffalo are entitled to any form of compensation?
He said there is nothing that the Leafs could do to prevent another team from entering the Toronto market. But there is ample precedence for the Leafs getting compensated. The Devils paid the Rangers and Isles, and the Ducks paid the Kings when they arrived.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 04:53 PM   #113
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Didn't Seattle shoot down an arena without at least an NBA team?
The deal that the City Council approved for the construction of the arena was contingent upon them being awarded an NBA franchise.

Now that it looks like they won't be getting an NBA team anytime soon, and NHL expansion is a real possibility, who knows if they'd amend the deal.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 05:26 PM   #114
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Deadline for expansion applications is Monday, but it looks like there won't be an application from Seattle because of the arena issues:

http://www.king5.com/story/sports/20...rena/30315745/
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 05:33 PM   #115
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Boooo I want Seattle more than any other spot for some reason.

Oh well at least they can keep it as a hammer for PHX or FLA.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 06:08 PM   #116
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Too bad about Seattle. I guess we're only getting one team for now, unless some other unlikely western market unexpectedly steps up.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 07:17 PM   #117
TX_Flame
Crash and Bang Winger
 
TX_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Deadline for expansion applications is Monday, but it looks like there won't be an application from Seattle because of the arena issues:

http://www.king5.com/story/sports/20...rena/30315745/
It does say that the Seattle suburb of Tukwila is still a possibility though.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
TX_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 07:23 PM   #118
Clarkey
Lifetime Suspension
 
Clarkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

With the cap, won't teams just put up boat anchor contract players in the expansion draft?
Clarkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 07:38 PM   #119
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
With the cap, won't teams just put up boat anchor contract players in the expansion draft?
Yes? And the expansion team will probably ignore them or take them and get trade a pic as well.

I imagine team put up the players they least want on their team, just like every draft!

Having a few boat achors contract will actually make the teams more compititive.
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 07:42 PM   #120
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TX_Flame View Post
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Not to be rude, but is there any way to remove this? It's a tad bothersome to read it each time.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy