06-30-2015, 01:29 PM
|
#61
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
|
Should atheists be allowed to get married?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GP_Matt For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-30-2015, 01:39 PM
|
#62
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyIlliterate
Well, here's the thing: Gay people aren't equal.
In fact, because everyone is different and unique, no one is equal.
So I wish people would stop expecting equality.
And I certainly wish people would stop asking for others to celebrate their differences and diversity, when at the same time demanding to be treated as equal as anyone else.
|
This is how people justify bigotry.
Quote:
Well, here's the thing: Black people aren't equal.
In fact, because everyone is different and unique, no one is equal.
So I wish people would stop expecting equality.
And I certainly wish people would stop asking for others to celebrate their differences and diversity, when at the same time demanding to be treated as equal as anyone else.
|
When you read it like that it seems straight out of the mouth of a klansmen in Mississippi in the 1960s.
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Last edited by Reaper; 06-30-2015 at 01:42 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Reaper For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-30-2015, 01:41 PM
|
#63
|
broke the first rule
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt
Should atheists be allowed to get married?
|
I'm also wondering if the state should allow divorces, since marriage is actually one man + one woman forever.
Or for the people who say marriage is for reproduction...those who aren't able to, or never want to have children but want to be married...should they be allowed?
Alternatively, if people should even be allowed to be Hindu, or other religions that don't worship God, as that's also directly against what the bible allows.
For me, in the context of the OP, I was originally on the "civil union" bandwagon. But there were so many holes in the anti-gay marriage arguments, that I couldn't reconcile why marriage shouldn't be allowed, especially when we're looking purely at the legal/government recognized institution, and not the ceremony that occurs in the church (which I believe, if the church doesn't want to perform the ceremony based on their doctrine, that' is their right as well).
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 01:45 PM
|
#64
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On your last nerve...:D
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyIlliterate
Well, here's the thing: Gay people aren't equal.
In fact, because everyone is different and unique, no one is equal.
So I wish people would stop expecting equality.
And I certainly wish people would stop asking for others to celebrate their differences and diversity, when at the same time demanding to be treated as equal as anyone else.
|
Ah, so LifeIlliterate is what your name should be. Got it.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Minnie For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-30-2015, 01:48 PM
|
#65
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyIlliterate
In the context of this discussion, perhaps only heterosexual adults have the right and freedom to marry, but only homosexual adults have the right and freedom to have a civil union.
|
Okay, so we've sorted out the sexes. How do we sort out the races now? Which races get Marriage and which ones get Civil Unions?
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 01:52 PM
|
#66
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calf
I'm also wondering if the state should allow divorces, since marriage is actually one man + one woman forever.
|
For what it's worth, we actually did have a little technicality with this here in Canada.
Quote:
On September 13, 2004, a lesbian couple known as "M.M." and "J.H." in Ontario were granted Canada's first same-sex divorce. Their initial divorce application had been denied based on the fact that the federal Divorce Act defines spouse as "either of a man or a woman who are married to each other". However, Madam Justice Ruth Mesbur of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled that the definition of "spouse" in the Divorce Act was unconstitutional.
|
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Okay, so we've sorted out the sexes. How do we sort out the races now? Which races get Marriage and which ones get Civil Unions?
|
I volunteer my race to take civil unions. The others can fight among themselves for marriage.
Union sounds cooler.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 01:55 PM
|
#67
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I am all for gay marriage myself, but this opens a very interesting debate in my eyes.
What if someone wants to Marry their best friend, same sex, but neither are gay? There are massive benefits to being married, especially with the amount of borrowing power you have. So two dudes are total best-bro's for life, and they don't want the inconvenience of a traditional marriage but still want the benefits. Why can they not have a classification of a civil union if they choose to go joint on everything? I have male friends I love and care about likely more than any woman that could come along in my life at this point, since they have been friends for 30+ years. The physical act of sex is not required under a marriage license, so can we get married as two straight men?
(This is hypothetical of course.... yes, hypothetical, that's it.)
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:00 PM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I saw that hypothetical on Reddit and it sounded like a great idea. 2 straight roommates get married for the tax breaks et al, because you can't make people prove they're actually gay without stomping all over people's rights. Will that become a thing? Probably not.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:04 PM
|
#69
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
I am all for gay marriage myself, but this opens a very interesting debate in my eyes.
What if someone wants to Marry their best friend, same sex, but neither are gay? There are massive benefits to being married, especially with the amount of borrowing power you have. So two dudes are total best-bro's for life, and they don't want the inconvenience of a traditional marriage but still want the benefits. Why can they not have a classification of a civil union if they choose to go joint on everything? I have male friends I love and care about likely more than any woman that could come along in my life at this point, since they have been friends for 30+ years. The physical act of sex is not required under a marriage license, so can we get married as two straight men?
(This is hypothetical of course.... yes, hypothetical, that's it.)
|
First of all, where do you come up with this?
Second this is probably worth a separate discussion for the most part because it is interesting somewhat. I've known several couples who eventually got married because the benefits for them were far greater then if they were just two single people together. Straight couples for what it's worth. In an ever changing world it's a bit silly being married brings you benefits being single doesn't.
Third... well it's called same sex marriage, not gay marriage. If you're two bro-dudes want to get married then do it. I don't think anyone is going to be checking for butt sex evidence afterwards.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:07 PM
|
#70
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey
I saw that hypothetical on Reddit and it sounded like a great idea. 2 straight roommates get married for the tax breaks et al, because you can't make people prove they're actually gay without stomping all over people's rights. Will that become a thing? Probably not.
|
The point I am trying to make is, does this open up the possibility where a civil union where sexual preference isn't a condition is a possibility. Asexual's should have access to the benefits of marriage as well IMO.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:10 PM
|
#71
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The Kilt & Caber
|
What exactly are the 'benefits of marriage'? Genuinely curious. I'm in a common-law relationship and I don't perceive myself having any benefits over my single friends.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:11 PM
|
#72
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
|
It's a interesting hypothetical, but how often does that happen between two friends of the opposite sex? I don't see it being any more likely when they're the same sex.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:11 PM
|
#73
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey
I saw that hypothetical on Reddit and it sounded like a great idea. 2 straight roommates get married for the tax breaks et al, because you can't make people prove they're actually gay without stomping all over people's rights. Will that become a thing? Probably not.
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Now_...huck_and_Larry
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:12 PM
|
#74
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
The point I am trying to make is, does this open up the possibility where a civil union where sexual preference isn't a condition is a possibility. Asexual's should have access to the benefits of marriage as well IMO.
|
People who don't want to get married, straight gay asexual or otherwise, should have the same tax benefits as any married person, agreed. That's probably an entirely separate debate from this though.
There is nothing stopping two straight dudes or an asexual person from marrying someone right now however.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:12 PM
|
#75
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
I am all for gay marriage myself, but this opens a very interesting debate in my eyes.
What if someone wants to Marry their best friend, same sex, but neither are gay? There are massive benefits to being married, especially with the amount of borrowing power you have. So two dudes are total best-bro's for life, and they don't want the inconvenience of a traditional marriage but still want the benefits. Why can they not have a classification of a civil union if they choose to go joint on everything? I have male friends I love and care about likely more than any woman that could come along in my life at this point, since they have been friends for 30+ years. The physical act of sex is not required under a marriage license, so can we get married as two straight men?
(This is hypothetical of course.... yes, hypothetical, that's it.)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey
I saw that hypothetical on Reddit and it sounded like a great idea. 2 straight roommates get married for the tax breaks et al, because you can't make people prove they're actually gay without stomping all over people's rights. Will that become a thing? Probably not.
|
I had a buddy that did something similar. He shared an apartment with two chicks, one was pretty hot (she had great thighs). The only draw back was his landlord, well the husband was old school and didn't like the idea of a guy living with two women. The wife was pretty cool, she seem into it. My buddy pretended to be gay, the landlord never really believed him, I mean it didn't help that a 3rd buddy of ours was always setting him up with dates and often my buddy would get caught up difficult to explain situations. The landlord was always questioning my buddy's sexuality, but he managed to pull it off for 7 years while he was in Law School.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:14 PM
|
#76
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Neither here nor there
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyah
What exactly are the 'benefits of marriage'? Genuinely curious. I'm in a common-law relationship and I don't perceive myself having any benefits over my single friends.
|
There's a few financial/tax benefits you get through marriage. Nothing to do with the actual relationship, that's a whole other debate haha.
__________________
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity" -Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:14 PM
|
#77
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
First of all, where do you come up with this?
|
Again, it's just a hypothetical question. I personally believe if two people are close enough to from a lifelong partnership, share the bills, the mortgage, even adopt a child as a non intimate couple, what makes them any less worthy of being a parent, or two be granted the same legal benefits.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:14 PM
|
#78
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyah
What exactly are the 'benefits of marriage'? Genuinely curious. I'm in a common-law relationship and I don't perceive myself having any benefits over my single friends.
|
http://www.canadianliving.com/life/m...re_married.php
There are many ways the government helps those that are married vs ones that aren't. It's a genuinely silly thing is this modern world, but IMO doesn't have much to do with this debate.
|
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:15 PM
|
#79
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother
I had a buddy that did something similar. He shared an apartment with two chicks, one was pretty hot (she had great thighs). The only draw back was his landlord, well the husband was old school and didn't like the idea of a guy living with two women. The wife was pretty cool, she seem into it. My buddy pretended to be gay, the landlord never really believed him, I mean it didn't help that a 3rd buddy of ours was always setting him up with dates and often my buddy would get caught up difficult to explain situations. The landlord was always questioning my buddy's sexuality, but he managed to pull it off for 7 years while he was in Law School.
|
You know Jack Tripper?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pylon For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-30-2015, 02:15 PM
|
#80
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother
I had a buddy that did something similar. He shared an apartment with two chicks, one was pretty hot (she had great thighs). The only draw back was his landlord, well the husband was old school and didn't like the idea of a guy living with two women. The wife was pretty cool, she seem into it. My buddy pretended to be gay, the landlord never really believed him, I mean it didn't help that a 3rd buddy of ours was always setting him up with dates and often my buddy would get caught up difficult to explain situations. The landlord was always questioning my buddy's sexuality, but he managed to pull it off for 7 years while he was in Law School.
|
I saw you at the Regal Beagle.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:17 PM.
|
|