Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2015, 09:32 AM   #401
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goflamesgo18 View Post
our first and top D prospect for a backup and bottom pairing d man?
Martinez and Muzzin aren't bottom pairing Dmen. Especially Muzzin, who is a top pair Dman.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:33 AM   #402
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Treliving: "you have to sort through the lies..."

Talbot to Calgary? I'll believe it when I see it.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tvp2003 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2015, 09:34 AM   #403
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'd be OK with two seconds for Talbot.

Generally speaking, most second rounders never get a taste of the NHL. If you can get a decent #1 goalie for two picks, then you do it.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:34 AM   #404
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goflamesgo18 View Post
our first and top D prospect for a backup and bottom pairing d man?
Jones would be our starter. Martinez or Muzzin would slot in on our second pair. That would be a solid hockey deal for the Flames.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:34 AM   #405
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Cam Talbot's time in the NHL has been very impressive.

2013/2014: 21 GP, 1.64 GAA, .941 S% (1st GAA, 1st S%)
2014/2015: 36 GP, 2.21 GAA, .926 S% (4th best GAA, 4th best S%)

Yeah, not the biggest sample size - but he's done nothing but succeed at the NHL level.

Dubnyk is about to make big dollars after sucking for a long long time and then putting together a good 39 games for Minnesota.

Goalies are weird.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:35 AM   #406
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Assuming you are going with _____+ Ortio, I think you need a really steady guy on and off the ice. Hiller seems that way, do Talbot or Jones? Dubnyk had a bit of a rep for an atitude issue but apparently this changed when he had a kid.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:35 AM   #407
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
I'd be OK with two seconds for Talbot.

Generally speaking, most second rounders never get a taste of the NHL. If you can get a decent #1 goalie for two picks, then you do it.
64% of second rounders get a taste of the NHL.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:37 AM   #408
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvp2003 View Post
Treliving: "you have to sort through the lies..."

Talbot to Calgary? I'll believe it when I see it.
That quote is about which teams are actually open to trade their first round selections (i.e. moving up or down in the first round).
flambers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:38 AM   #409
dieHARDflameZ
Franchise Player
 
dieHARDflameZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Icon32

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
This gets thrown around a lot but the fact of the matter is that Hiller stats-wise over 52 games was in a dead heat with guys like Luongo, Andersen and better than guys like Lack, Ward, Miller, Anderson, Bobrovsky, etc. Fans have to come to grips that guys like Price, Lundquist, Rinne are the exception not the norm for goaltending level of play. Flames goaltending at worst was pretty average but wasn't nearly as bad as some make it out to be at times.
I tend to agree with everything you said. The one issue for me was there was a period of time where it seemed like the Flames goalies were allowing at least one soft goal per game. The odd bad goal happens don't get me wrong, but when it starts costing teams games, it becomes a huge area of concern...

I haven't seen a ton of Cam Talbot but is he really worth giving up potentially multiple assets to acquire?

I really like the idea of running with Hiller and Ortio. The latter looked fantastic in all but one or two of the games he played last season.

The only way that acquiring Talbot makes sense to me is if there is a plan in place to move Hiller out and Treliving has no intention of re-signing Ramo.
dieHARDflameZ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dieHARDflameZ For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2015, 09:40 AM   #410
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

I would be cool with Talbot-Ortio going into next year. Fits with the youth movement and has the potential to be a great tandem.

However at the cost of two 2nds, I am unsure about this. We need help on D moreso than we need help at goalie, IMO.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:41 AM   #411
azzarish
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
I'd be OK with two seconds for Talbot.

Generally speaking, most second rounders never get a taste of the NHL. If you can get a decent #1 goalie for two picks, then you do it.
In this draft, I wouldn't be OK with it at all.

I mean whatever happens will happen, but I don't see it as a good move.
azzarish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:41 AM   #412
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

I can actually envision a scenario where the Flames add a goalie to the mix (Eg Talbot) and don't subtract one (Eg Hiller).

I don't think they are going to gift Ortio an NHL spot, back up or otherwise. Even with the waiver situation.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2015, 09:42 AM   #413
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ View Post
I tend to agree with everything you said. The one issue for me was there was a period of time where it seemed like the Flames goalies were allowing at least one soft goal per game. The odd bad goal happens don't get me wrong, but when it starts costing teams games, it becomes a huge area of concern...

I haven't seen a ton of Cam Talbot but is he really worth giving up potentially multiple assets to acquire?

I really like the idea of running with Hiller and Ortio. The latter looked fantastic in all but one or two of the games he played last season.

The only way that acquiring Talbot makes sense to me is if there is a plan in place to move Hiller out and Treliving has no intention of re-signing Ramo.
I get the "soft goal" sentiment, but if you lok at a lot of fan websites, they say the exact same thing about their goalies.

I think Treliving would have wrapped up Ramo by now if it was going to happen. Unless he has a deal in principle but doesn't want to announce it for fear of affecting a Hiller trade value.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2015, 09:42 AM   #414
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

There's only two ways you can acquire an elite goalie.

1. Draft him
2. Acquire him before he becomes elite

Clearly some teams in the NHL believe Talbot fits into #2.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:42 AM   #415
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
I can actually envision a scenario where the Flames add a goalie to the mix (Eg Talbot) and don't subtract one (Eg Hiller).

I don't think they are going to gift Ortio an NHL spot, back up or otherwise. Even with the waiver situation.
####, sorry I mis-read your response. My bad.

Last edited by Finger Cookin; 06-26-2015 at 09:54 AM. Reason: Reading comprehension
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:44 AM   #416
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
64% of second rounders get a taste of the NHL.
And only 20 or 25% stick around for longer than 100 games. Even a smaller percentage of those become impact players.

I get it, it's draft day, we all love the hype surrounding these kids, but really, outside the top 5 or 10 players, most of the draft is a crap shoot.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:45 AM   #417
Yamer
Franchise Player
 
Yamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Red Deer
Exp:
Default

I'm growing warmer to this idea.

If Ramo is indeed headed for what he believes are greener pastures, and the Flames are not sold on a Hiller/Ortio combo for next season, then I think picking up Talbot (who is entering his prime and has put up consistent numbers) gives them a pretty decent stop-gap until one of Gillies/McDonald/Ortio emerges as a legitimate #1.

I would be fine with a Talbot/Ortio combo (less so with a Talbot/Hiller combo), and if it costs 2 X 2nd round picks and you are able to recuperate at least a pick for Hiller as a consolation prize for one of the failed bidders then you might come away OK.

Would Hiller be worth a 2nd and a 3rd, or a 2nd and a B grade prospect?
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey."
-'Badger' Bob Johnson (1931-1991)

"I see as much misery out of them moving to justify theirselves as them that set out to do harm."
-Dr. Amos "Doc" Cochran
Yamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:45 AM   #418
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
So you think Ramo is re-signing? Or that Gilles will challenge Ortio for the backup spot in 15-16? Or that another FA goalie is also being added?
Flames have already mentioned the plan for Gillies next year is AHL, he needs to play lots of games...

(Flames GM mentioned this via Fan960).
flambers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:46 AM   #419
dieHARDflameZ
Franchise Player
 
dieHARDflameZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I get the "soft goal" sentiment, but if you lok at a lot of fan websites, they say the exact same thing about their goalies.

I think Treliving would have wrapped up Ramo by now if it was going to happen. Unless he has a deal in principle but doesn't want to announce it for fear of affecting a Hiller trade value.
I honestly remember a string of games (don't remember how many) where I could have sworn there was what could be classified as a "bad goal" let in almost every game by Hiller or Ramo.

I agree It's doubtful Ramo gets re-signed in Calgary.
dieHARDflameZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:46 AM   #420
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
And only 20 or 25% stick around for longer than 100 games. Even a smaller percentage of those become impact players.

I get it, it's draft day, we all love the hype surrounding these kids, but really, outside the top 5 or 10 players, most of the draft is a crap shoot.
So what constitutes a "taste"? If you meant >100 games, just say so. No need for vague tastes of cups of coffee.

Also, it's 32% for 100+ games.

Last edited by Finger Cookin; 06-26-2015 at 09:49 AM.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy