Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2015, 08:53 AM   #341
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
I think any deal would have to be contingent on being able to work out an extension ahead of time.

What a disaster that would be to acquire a pending UFA back-up goalie for anything more than 3rd round pick.

We are still a rebuilding team and I would rather risk taking a step back next season then see the team make a "win now" trade like this.
My understanding with league rules, no contract discussions can occur until January. Due to 1 year remaining on his contract and the player becoming a UFA.

Pretty sure, I heard this on Fan960 yesterday.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2015, 08:54 AM   #342
Igster
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
I'm curious to hear, if we ever do, why Ramo isn't returning.
Maybe he doesn't want to share the net?
Igster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 08:55 AM   #343
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Treliving do you know how much time and money I've spent researching and reading draft previews? You had better not have wasted my time by trading the second round picks away!


Green text needed?
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 08:56 AM   #344
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Treliving do you know how much time and money I've spent researching and reading draft previews? You had better not have wasted my time by trading the second round picks away!


Green text needed?
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 08:56 AM   #345
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Regarding the pending UFA part of acquiring Talbot, the Flames did ensure they talked to Talbot prior to making any trade. While contract specifics can't be negotiated during that time, Talbot's fit with the club and its plans certainly would be discussed. Should a trade be finalized with the Flames acquiring Talbot, it's safe to assume that this discussion gave the Flames confidence that signing him would be very likely.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 08:56 AM   #346
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igster View Post
Maybe he doesn't want to share the net?
Definitely one of the possibilities, or just wants too much money, etc...

I thought Calgary playing Ramo in the elimination game, meant he was their man going forward. Maybe all it meant is that Hiller isn't.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 08:56 AM   #347
smalltownref
Backup Goalie
 
smalltownref's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

IMO this is not a 'win now' trade. Treliving has been working the phones hard these last few weeks, and he's not one to like carrying three goalies at all. He has a plan. If we acquire Talbot, I am pretty comfortable in saying that one of Hiller/Ortio is on their way out. No way does Treliving pull off a deal for Talbot if he doesn't already have a trade framed up for one of the other two guys. He said he now has a much better understanding of the team and what the asset values are, I trust he will continue to try to maximize those assets. He said we aren't a piece or two away from contending from a championship, and Talbot surely doesn't make the Flames legit contenders, but if this is step one of many that helps the Flames get to that point... sign me up.

GFG
smalltownref is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 08:58 AM   #348
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

We are debating how this makes sense for the Flames, but Lundqvist isn't getting any younger -- why are the Rangers trading Talbot instead of moving other contracts to lock him up long-term? How many years left do the Rangers think Lundqvist has?
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cannon7 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2015, 08:59 AM   #349
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
We are debating how this makes sense for the Flames, but Lundqvist isn't getting any younger -- why are the Rangers trading Talbot instead of moving other contracts to lock him up long-term? How many years left do the Rangers think Lundqvist has?
Because they know they are selling high on Talbot. That's my guess.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2015, 08:59 AM   #350
Otto-matic
Franchise Player
 
Otto-matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
I'm curious to hear, if we ever do, why Ramo isn't returning.
I would assume its for more playing time, he probably doesn't want to play second fiddle to Orito. Also he should be in for a decent pay raise.
Otto-matic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 08:59 AM   #351
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
While EDM and CGY are in on Talbot with NYR, don't rule out the two Alberta teams also having interest in LAK Martin Jones, who may move.

Last edited by sureLoss; 06-26-2015 at 09:03 AM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:00 AM   #352
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
We are debating how this makes sense for the Flames, but Lundqvist isn't getting any younger -- why are the Rangers trading Talbot instead of moving other contracts to lock him up long-term? How many years left do the Rangers think Lundqvist has?
Whether Henrik is getting younger or not has nothing to do with it. He's still got 6 more years left on his deal. He's their goalie for a long time still, and Talbot would be 33 by the time Lundqvists contract is up.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:00 AM   #353
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
save us Dale Tallon!

Kevin Weekes @KevinWeekes
On that note,I'm told @FlaPanthers have considerable interest in @NYRangers Talbot as well. @NHLNetwork
What happened to Luongo? That makes no sense.
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:00 AM   #354
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Definitely one of the possibilities, or just wants too much money, etc...

I thought Calgary playing Ramo in the elimination game, meant he was their man going forward. Maybe all it meant is that Hiller isn't.
That would have required (a) signing Ramo at whatever could be negotiated and (b) trading Hiller for whatever return that could be obtained. I don't think they viewed Ramo as so far superior to Hiller to make that happen. Additionally, I'm not convinced Hartley prefers Ramo to Hiller. Hiller had more starts, less pulls and generally a slightly longer leash.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:01 AM   #355
UKflames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
UKflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Exp:
Default

If BT is playing chicken with Chiarelli, I hope that Edmonton blink first
UKflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:01 AM   #356
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie 2m2 minutes ago
While EDM and CGY are in on Talbot with NYR, don't rule out the two Alberta teams also having interest in LAK Martin Jones, who may move.

..
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:02 AM   #357
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

It is clear the Flames don't like what they have in net for next season. And I can't say I blame them. They Flames got in the playoffs in spite of mediocre to below average goaltending. If they don't think Ortio is ready - they probably see this as a chance to shore up the position until Gillies is ready in 3 years.
We will see what the price is, but goaltending isn't exactly a strong point for the organization so I kinda get it.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2015, 09:03 AM   #358
skudr248
First Line Centre
 
skudr248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winchestertonfieldville Jail
Exp:
Default

#### i'm stressed. I am to young to be stressed
skudr248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:04 AM   #359
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

The only thing I can think of is Treliving is trying to drive up the prices of goaltending, acquire a young one, then ships off Hiller.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 09:04 AM   #360
Dagger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

It would be brutal to ship one second, let alone two for either Talbot or Jones. There's good ones in the system, Ortio appears to be about ready, and it's becoming increasingly clear that goaltender performance is largely a function of the defense in front of them.
Dagger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy