Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2015, 03:23 AM   #2061
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubeyr1 View Post
Meier and Connor will be gone. Yet you think Merkley and Konecky have less bust potential than Svechnikov? I think the complete opposite. Svechnikov is skilled but has true NHL size. He is the safe pick!

When we call a 5 ' 8" 170 pound guy a safe pick as a first rounder? Not bad mouthing Konecky just stating facts. Drafting a guy that size in any round is a big risk. In the first round its borderline stupid. Not saying your stupid, or the Flames if they pick him.

You would have to really love Konecky and think he is twice the player the others are to take that risk. He is definitely not the safe pick! Same can be said for Merkley!
It could very well be that scouts think Svechnikov's upside may simply be not be as high as Konecny's, despite difference in size and injury history. Konecny is consistently ranked in the top 15 and ahead of Svechnikov by most publications - if the bust potential was as high as you say it is and the difference in talent between Konecny and the rest of the forwards in that range was close enough that teams could simply pick the bigger, "safer" guy I doubt he would be ranked this high. Any hockey player period is at risk to get concussed, it sounds like his size hasn't affected his on-ice performance at all, and he actually could turn out to be a safe pick.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubeyr1 View Post
I just don't see Calgary picking either of those players based off Burke Treliving and Hartley. If we want those guys we should seriously consider trading down in the draft. Pick up another asset to lessen the gambe we would be taking.
Burke isn't the GM. Treliving has said they will pick best player available and Button has said they prioritize offensive skill when they scout. Doubt Hartley has much of a say but I know he values character very highly and that is something Konecny and Merkley both reportedly have (not saying Svechnikov doesn't, he very well could). Point is, with all this recent talk about Calgary liking these guys and their approach to the draft, there is a very real chance Calgary could pick them. Personally my wish is one of the top 13 drops to our pick. But it's always interesting to see who the Flames pick and see where they ranked on their board compared to others.

Unlikely both Merkley and Konecny are available if the Flames trade down past 20.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 03:29 AM   #2062
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
It could very well be that scouts think Svechnikov's upside may simply be not be as high as Konecny's, despite difference in size and injury history. Konecny is consistently ranked in the top 15 and ahead of Svechnikov by most publications - if the bust potential was as high as you say it is and the difference in talent between Konecny and the rest of the forwards in that range was close enough that teams could simply pick the bigger, "safer" guy I doubt he would be ranked this high. Any hockey player period is at risk to get concussed, it sounds like his size hasn't affected his on-ice performance at all, and he actually could turn out to be a safe pick.



Burke isn't the GM. Treliving has said they will pick best player available and Button has said they prioritize offensive skill when they scout. Doubt Hartley has much of a say but I know he values character very highly and that is something Konecny and Merkley both reportedly have (not saying Svechnikov doesn't, he very well could). Point is, with all this recent talk about Calgary liking these guys and their approach to the draft, there is a very real chance Calgary could pick them. Personally my wish is one of the top 13 drops to our pick. But it's always interesting to see who the Flames pick and see where they ranked on their board compared to others.

Unlikely both Merkley and Konecny are available if the Flames trade down past 20.
There's also a solid chance neither of them are on the board if we stick at 15.

I think we're going to end up with a very solid RW prospect this year. So many good ones to choose from, and they can't all be gone by 15.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 05:31 AM   #2063
Trailer Fire
First Line Centre
 
Trailer Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
Exp:
Default

I'm OK with taking a few guys with our first rounder, but holy Jeebus I hope we pick up Nick Meloche with #45. I would do many, many horrible things to get him in Flames silks.
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.

Last edited by Trailer Fire; 06-23-2015 at 06:14 AM.
Trailer Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Trailer Fire For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2015, 05:33 AM   #2064
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Merkley appears to be a very smart player. My concern is that his shot seems to consist of shovelling the puck at the net.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhAdo0aFg_0
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 07:48 AM   #2065
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

3 days... is it just me or are the days getting longer?
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2015, 08:42 AM   #2066
Komskies
Franchise Player
 
Komskies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Saw this interesting graph on reddit this morning. Games played and goals scored by draft round since 2001. It just shows that scouting has been getting better and better and you really need to make those first and second rounders count.

https://twitter.com/NHLtoSeattle/sta...45129788944385

Spoiler!
Komskies is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Komskies For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2015, 08:47 AM   #2067
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
Merkley appears to be a very smart player. My concern is that his shot seems to consist of shovelling the puck at the net.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhAdo0aFg_0
He definitely fits the bill as an aggressive playmaking winger. Hard nose for the net too and a mean streak.

Jeff Marek seems to think he's what the Flames want.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 08:47 AM   #2068
FLAMESRULE
First Line Centre
 
FLAMESRULE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The centre of everything
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Komskies View Post
Saw this interesting graph on reddit this morning. Games played and goals scored by draft round since 2001. It just shows that scouting has been getting better and better and you really need to make those first and second rounders count.

https://twitter.com/NHLtoSeattle/sta...45129788944385

Spoiler!
But then you look at the increase in how many games undrafted players are playing...seems like they're still missing a sizeable percentage of players who can make it to the show.
FLAMESRULE is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FLAMESRULE For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2015, 08:52 AM   #2069
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

My concern with Merkley is that he is a physically smaller guy that doesn't have great skating.

In order to be small in the NHL you better be able to skate.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 09:09 AM   #2070
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
3 days... is it just me or are the days getting longer?
Holy crap, I didn't realize it was only three days away. Living in this bubble of ignorance around this draft has been amazing
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 09:20 AM   #2071
azzarish
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailer Fire View Post
I'm OK with taking a few guys with our first rounder, but holy Jeebus I hope we pick up Nick Meloche with #45. I would do many, many horrible things to get him in Flames silks.
I think he'll be gone by #45. Probably early in the 2nd round.

I would really like him too.
azzarish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 09:26 AM   #2072
azzarish
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubeyr1 View Post
Meier and Connor will be gone. Yet you think Merkley and Konecky have less bust potential than Svechnikov? I think the complete opposite. Svechnikov is skilled but has true NHL size. He is the safe pick!

When we call a 5 ' 8" 170 pound guy a safe pick as a first rounder? Not bad mouthing Konecky just stating facts. Drafting a guy that size in any round is a big risk. In the first round its borderline stupid. Not saying your stupid, or the Flames if they pick him.

You would have to really love Konecky and think he is twice the player the others are to take that risk. He is definitely not the safe pick! Same can be said for Merkley!

Not saying I would be disappointed with any player really! I can not tell the future. Guys that size though are hard pressed to become NHLers. We got lucky with Gaudreau, lets not forget he was a fourth round pick.

I just don't see Calgary picking either of those players based off Burke Treliving and Hartley. If we want those guys we should seriously consider trading down in the draft. Pick up another asset to lessen the gambe we would be taking.
I personally think the safer pick out of Konecny and Svechnikov is Konecny, but everyone has their own definition of what a bust actually constitutes. Any player whether they are small or big can be a bust really.

I'm sure whatever decision the Flames make will be based on all the information they can possibly get their hands on. I also don't think either of Konecny or Merkley will be available if we traded down. If we trade down we will probably have a really good idea the player we want is available, which means it's probably 1 in a group of 4 or 5. In that case, just stay at 15.
azzarish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 09:31 AM   #2073
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
My concern with Merkley is that he is a physically smaller guy that doesn't have great skating.

In order to be small in the NHL you better be able to skate.
His skating seemed fine to me. It's his shot that I am worried about.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 11:22 AM   #2074
H2SO4(aq)
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
His skating seemed fine to me. It's his shot that I am worried about.
This. He seems to have the speed to burn defensemen in Jr. so translate that to the NHL and he likely is adequately fast to keep up, even if he does lose that element to his game before adjusting. But it doesn't seem like he took a single shot all year.

I think he projects to be a top 6 winger, and the Flames have spoken a lot about getting bigger in the top 6, so Im not sure how good of a fit he is.
H2SO4(aq) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 11:35 AM   #2075
JohnnyT
Scoring Winger
 
JohnnyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: YQL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq) View Post
This. He seems to have the speed to burn defensemen in Jr. so translate that to the NHL and he likely is adequately fast to keep up, even if he does lose that element to his game before adjusting. But it doesn't seem like he took a single shot all year.

I think he projects to be a top 6 winger, and the Flames have spoken a lot about getting bigger in the top 6, so Im not sure how good of a fit he is.
One thing with the Bruke/Treliving is that they're not as "intellectually honest" with the fans as the Fester was. I'm sure they want to get bigger, but they also want to get faster, and adding that size can come in a number of different ways including or not including the draft and their 1st round pick.
__________________
JohnnyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 12:32 PM   #2076
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Konecky is a bit of a Sam Bennett type guy in terms of how he'll put himself in harm's way to make a play. Being a smaller guy that doesn't always go well, but could also see the Flames liking his tenacity.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 12:34 PM   #2077
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I have this really weird feeling Matthew Barzal falls into the Flames' lap on Friday.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 12:47 PM   #2078
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
I have this really weird feeling Matthew Barzal falls into the Flames' lap on Friday.
What makes you think this? I'd be shocked if New Jersey didn't take him. Maybe San Jose at the very latest, but I really think he's a Devil.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
14
Old 06-23-2015, 12:54 PM   #2079
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
What makes you think this? I'd be shocked if New Jersey didn't take him. Maybe San Jose at the very latest, but I really think he's a Devil.
Jersey could just as easily Take Rantanen. SJ could go with the bigger and equally skilled Guryanov. With the amount of risers and fallers this year, I think the only ones that are safe locks for the top half of the draft are Hanifin, the wonder twins at the top, Provorov, Marner and Strome. Kyle Connor can go to NJ for all we know, I don't really see a big difference in that tier.
Svechnikov can go Higher, Any one of a few D men like Roy or Zboril can as well.

The talent grouping being so close it may come down to NHL ready size. Pushing an average sized player like Barzal down.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 01:39 PM   #2080
shutout
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

Really cool tool to see where the general draft consensus is for the players
Easier to see in a graphical form than viewing on a consolidated spreadsheet.

http://donttellmeaboutheart.blogspot...lity-tool.html
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
shutout is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shutout For This Useful Post:
kn
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy