Where to begin? Perhaps with the central setting for the movie - not the desert, but the war rig itself. Fantastic in its details - down to the shoe-measuring device for a gas pedal - and imposing in its entirety, this is like a frigate from a great sailing film: those on board are tied to its survival and its forward progress. Falling overboard is almost certain death, it must be mended on the fly, it must be protected from boarders at every angle. There's a certain swashbuckling quality to the action here, the verticality of the action, setting course into the perilous rising storm, the constant movement... but pushed up to a ridiculous speed. The movement of the war rig drives the pace of the movie almost literally. We spend so much time on the war rig that we The movie slows down only when the rig needs to cool, and yet even those moments are filled with an anxiousness to get moving again. Even the fight scene where the tethered Max and Nux struggle against Furiosa and the wives has that swashbuckling quality.
Yet while there is a captain-of-the-ship quality to Furiosa, these characters are clearly not swashbucklers. They seem to come out of a great western, each with a different drive to them, a different morality. Max holds an obvious comparison to Clint Eastwood's man with no name, with maybe a touch of Harmonica thrown in. These are not characters who have epiphanies; these are resolute representations of powerful forces. It's significant that Furiosa never asks Max for his help. Not because she's too proud, but because the stakes are such a knife's edge that anyone you need to ask for help isn't someone you can trust. Instead, the characters read each other, understand one another's motivations and trust one another not because of any agreement but because they each understand the sort of person the other is. And we can read them too... we don't need them to tell us what drives them, so it's a little refreshing that they don't. Max's survivalism is best stated when Furiosa asks what they should do if he doesn't go back. His answer to go on suggests that he cannot imagine anyone thinking there could be any other answer. He teaches Furiosa to put less in hope and more in herself.
But for me, Nux was an absolutely pivotal character. He began so eager to die for all the wrong reasons, found something to live for, and in the right moment was willing to die for all the right reasons. And like Furiosa and Max, nobody needed to convince him of why he needed to do the right thing, he reached that point largely on his own. In a story where the two main characters are so stoic and in their need for survival or redemption, you need someone looking for meaning. To the extent that Furiosa and Max change their world, that change is best shown in the change that Nux undergoes over the course of the film.
I'm surprised with how much I actually like the screenplay here, simply because it is just so stripped down. It's not that it's a shallow story, it's that nearly every unnecessary line or conversation has been stripped out, and in this instance it makes not only for great pacing, but really good characterizations.
Of course, the action is brilliant. The psychotic apocolyptic vision is brilliant. The cinematography is brilliant. But it's just so damn perfectly constructed. It is exactly what it wants to be. It is exactly what countless other action films have wanted to be but failed.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to octothorp For This Useful Post:
I want to go back and watch this again in the DBOX seats.
Movie was unreal.
This was actually my first time sitting in a DBOX. I liked the extra space. But it did take 1/2 the movie before I got used to it. And every time the seat moved forward I found myself planting my feet down and pushing back. Unsure if I want to pay for that again.
I really enjoyed it but I'm wondering, with all the Michael Bay hate in the world, why the sentiment towards this explosion fest is so different?
Michael Bay is awful at characterization, pacing, and plot.
I actually enjoy the stuff exploding portions of Michael Bay's movies, in fact they are the only watchable parts. His dialogue and "down" portions of his movies are abysmal, and often boring.
This is outside the fact that there has never been one interesting female character in a single one of his movies. Most just exist to show that the main character is straight, or to be eye-candy, or to play the damsel.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to PsYcNeT For This Useful Post:
Michael Bay is awful at characterization, pacing, and plot.
I actually enjoy the stuff exploding portions of Michael Bay's movies, in fact they are the only watchable parts. His dialogue and "down" portions of his movies are abysmal, and often boring.
This is outside the fact that there has never been one interesting female character in a single one of his movies. Most just exist to show that the main character is straight, or to be eye-candy, or to play the damsel.
Has your avatar always winked? Can't believe I just noticed that.
The Following User Says Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
All of the things MattC and PsYcNeT listed and the fact Fury Road used some actual practical effects. The vast majority of explosions looked real.
Agreed. It's amazing the impact real special effects has. There was some CGI for sure, but pretty much anything that happened during the chases looked like it was done for real. As I said in my first post, hats off to the FX team. They did a great job.
