05-05-2015, 10:52 PM
|
#41
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgARI
All the money flowing through this league and they don't have the technology and/or brainpower to be able to conclude that. Embarrassment.
|
Its a greedy league. This is a league that fights the players every 4 years about the Olympics over a few bucks.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2015, 10:52 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Even NFL replay would have got that right. Not exactly sure what the NHL felt they needed to see for that to be considered a goal if that still shot isn't evidence enough. Like I said the league is very fortunate that the Flames came back because that was a terrible ruling and if you can't call a goal a goal then why bother even having Toronto look at it as they proved themselves incompetent tonight.
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 10:54 PM
|
#43
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Even NFL replay would have got that right. Not exactly sure what the NHL felt they needed to see for that to be considered a goal if that shot isn't evidence enough. Like I said the league is very fortunate that the Flames came back because that was a terrible ruling and if you can't call a goal a goal then why bother even having Toronto look at it as they proved themselves incompetent tonight.
|
Maybe. The NFL may have also ruled that the puck did not make a "Football move" after it fully crossed the line.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to P-DAZZLE For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2015, 10:55 PM
|
#44
|
Franchise Player
|
Flames got facked, not surprised they get facked on everything
when the NHL awards come in they will get facked again...in fact they already have
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:00 PM
|
#45
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 103 104END 106 109 111 117 122 202 203 207 208 216 217 219 221 222 224 225 313 317 HC G
|
Putting small cameras in the corner of the crossbar is easy is it not? Much easier to implement then what should be the end game which is some sort of tracking system that can pinpoint the puck anywhere on the ice.
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:03 PM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Can we have a Bob Hartley "look at the #####ing screen" please
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:04 PM
|
#47
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
If the NHL actually has cameras in the goalpost then ####ing show us the view instead of releasing a statement saying it's inconclusive...
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:05 PM
|
#48
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
|
What a ####ing joke of a call. Absolutely brutal review. Are they ####ing blind??? It worked out okay in the end!
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:08 PM
|
#49
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
|
Thank you Johnny!
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:08 PM
|
#50
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
For a few thousand bucks you could fill the goal posts with a few camera that have a better view, though I supposed it would hard to justify with how poor the NHL is.
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:11 PM
|
#51
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
If the puck was in the air, the view is inconclusive.
|
Exactly, get over it guys, it was the right call. At least the Flames won so it doesn't matter.
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:12 PM
|
#52
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale
45deg angle be damned. How can that honestly not be considered a legit angle to declare it a goal?? It's bloody in.
|
I feel like the moment that gif freezes is a frame or two after the puck made its most forward progress.
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:12 PM
|
#53
|
Franchise Player
|
well maybe it was a bad angle..... maybe the puck AND Andersen's skate were 3 or 4 inches off the ice giving a bad angle.
Sure would like to see the NHL explanation of how the TV angle could be distorted to make the puck, obviously on the ice , look like it was in goal,, on the other side of the red line and is not a goal.
Is the goal line only a suggestion??
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:13 PM
|
#54
|
First Line Centre
|
The refs need to start carrying cellphones.....
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:15 PM
|
#55
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Even the Ducks thought it was a goal:
|
|
|
The Following 31 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
apiquard,
BACKCHECK!!!,
CalgaryFan1988,
calgaryred,
cam_wmh,
devo22,
Domoic,
DoubleK,
DynamRyan,
Eric,
Flashpoint,
GettinIggyWithIt,
handgroen,
Har-Calgary,
heep223,
InBurkeWeTrust,
Inferno099,
Jaybo,
JiriHrdina,
lambeburger,
M*A*S*H 4077,
Maritime Q-Scout,
Mattman,
Nehkara,
normtwofinger,
Phaneuf_Phan,
PugnaciousIntern,
Rejean31,
sakicforpm,
Stealth22,
the2bears
|
05-05-2015, 11:15 PM
|
#56
|
Franchise Player
|
Why doesn't the NHL have Hawkeye
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:16 PM
|
#57
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
|
Am I the only one that sees the puck bounce out a little bit before any video stops? The gif SureLoss posted the puck bounces off the pad a tad before the freeze frame, no?
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Trailer Fire For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:17 PM
|
#58
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canada
|
This just confirms the league hasn't done its job finding a solution to these goals/non-goals since 04. It may have costed the Flames a cup win in 04' and I would hate to see this cost another team a chance to win the cup. Get your **** together NHL.
__________________
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:17 PM
|
#59
|
Franchise Player
|
Or at least high speed HD cameras like in Mythbusters.
|
|
|
05-05-2015, 11:21 PM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Why doesn't the NHL have Hawkeye
|
"Murphy said the NHL also consulted with Hawk-Eye Innovations Ltd., the company that does reviews for tennis and other sports, but didn't feel it was right. Too many bodies and sticks in the way on an ice rink made for very different conditions than a tennis court."
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=701676
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.
|
|