04-27-2015, 11:19 AM
|
#61
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
One of our best players in the playoffs was wearing 63. A key contributor was wearing 79. There's nothing about the numbers on the backs that makes this team what it is. It's a silly rule.
|
Those numbers have nothing to do with his rule though. They are the typical training camp numbers.
If Bennett had a high number full time it would be 93, Ferland wore 27 in Brandon and 19 for Adirondack.
Quote:
|
Also, if you're not going to tie up your tie, just take it off. No one is going to be bothered if you don't have a tie on, and it looks way less stupid than having it hanging around your neck.
|
The tie, the hair, the dip.....I'm pretty sure he just does this to troll twitter now.
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 11:24 AM
|
#62
|
|
Franchise Player
|
And Bennett and the team would have done just as well if he wore 93.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 11:27 AM
|
#63
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
I want to be clear - I posted what I think Burke's reasoning is on high numbers. I didn't endorse that reasoning.
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 12:18 PM
|
#64
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
People really need to get over the no high number rule.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 12:25 PM
|
#65
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire
People really need to get over the no high number rule.
|
Agree
I think Bennett will be quite content with 39.
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 12:26 PM
|
#66
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dying4acup
Agree
I think Bennett will be quite content with 39.
|
If he's allowed 39. IIRC the only #s allowed are 1-35.
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 12:33 PM
|
#67
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix
If he's allowed 39. IIRC the only #s allowed are 1-35.
|
I think Conroy mentioned he wants to raise it to 44.
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 01:57 PM
|
#68
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 02:08 PM
|
#70
|
|
Norm!
|
Yeah, thats much better
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 02:15 PM
|
#71
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Going for the Gordon Gecko look.
Last edited by GioforPM; 04-27-2015 at 02:20 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 02:16 PM
|
#72
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Some of those videos were pretty awesome. Gives you chills hearing the dome erupt on Stajan's mic'd up goal. Love seeing the locker room stuff as well. Team make up is so important both on and off the ice and I think it was a huge downfall during the Iginla era Flames and is a major strong point of this team.
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2015, 03:11 PM
|
#74
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
One of our best players in the playoffs was wearing 63. A key contributor was wearing 79. There's nothing about the numbers on the backs that makes this team what it is. It's a silly rule.
Also, if you're not going to tie up your tie, just take it off. No one is going to be bothered if you don't have a tie on, and it looks way less stupid than having it hanging around your neck.
|
He most likely has a stipulation in his contract about dress code. Alond the lines of suit and tie. He probably hates that and it probably does not specifically it has to be done up.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 PM.
|
|
