|
View Poll Results: Who gets suspended?
|
|
Burrows
|
   
|
141 |
32.34% |
|
Bieksa
|
  
|
32 |
7.34% |
|
Hamhuis
|
  
|
153 |
35.09% |
|
No one
|
  
|
202 |
46.33% |
04-19-2015, 11:13 PM
|
#21
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
|
I doubt it
I think its awesome that the "nobody" Ferkland suckered Bieksa into dumb plays
I honestly think Bieksa might be the lowest IQ player in the NHL
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:13 PM
|
#22
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Linesman did an amazing job most of the night to break stuff up.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Yoho For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:14 PM
|
#23
|
|
First Line Centre
|
The way the league has been making a big fuss about head hits, Hamhuis seems automatic to me. But then again he's not a 3rd pairing bum so he gets a pass. Probably no to the others.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Redrum For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:14 PM
|
#24
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
None, and a fifty-cent fine for Willie.
I have no faith in the NHL to do anything rational.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:15 PM
|
#25
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
The difference between Friday and tonight was the Flames were just gooning things up at the end of the game while the Canucks were trying to injure the Flames skilled players with cheap hits on Gaudreau and Bennett. I'm sure the league isn't blind to this but given how much the Canucks organization whines that the league is out to get them there's pressure not to do anything here. The NHL has proven over and over that they are reactive not proactive and will just wait for a player to have his season ended before they consider action.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:15 PM
|
#26
|
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Feb 2011
Exp: 
|
Hamhuis will get a suspension that was a scary hit on a young player.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to djmichaelk For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:15 PM
|
#27
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Hamhuis better be suspended... that was as huge cheapshot. People get put of out of games with that kind of hit...
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:15 PM
|
#28
|
|
Franchise Player
|
No suspensions, a fine to Hamhuis and a fine to Desjardins of the same amount that Hartley received. The Burrows hit on Gaudreau was a 2 minute penalty, nothing more and the instigator will be rescinded as they always are. Why would Bieksa get suspended?
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:16 PM
|
#29
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kelowna, B.C.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
If Hamhuis doesn't get suspended, then the tone is set for the series and nothing is off limits.
|
Bring on the Wolf!
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:17 PM
|
#30
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the RR diner
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blender
Let's get real. I'll be surprised if there are any suspensions at all, but if it was me and it was my JOB to protect players, I'd do the following:
Burrows: Rescind a la Engelland to even it up cause that's how we roll at NHL Player Safety. Plus, nothing serious ever seems to happen to Burrows. He was penalized on the play. Enough said.
Bieksa: Nothing to see here.
Hamhuis: 1 game for a dangerous hit to the head. We want to protect our star players because we know what is in our best interests.
|
Agreed 100%. I think if the league doesn't step in they condone something potentially really nasty in the coming games and Hamhuis is the one that is different from what happened in game 2.
__________________
Harry, I'm gonna let you in on a little secret. Every day, once a day, give yourself a present. Don't plan it, don't wait for it, just... let it happen. Could be a new shirt at the men's store, a catnap in your office chair, or... two cups of good, hot, black coffee.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:17 PM
|
#31
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard
No suspensions, a fine to Hamhuis and a fine to Desjardins of the same amount that Hartley received. The Burrows hit on Gaudreau was a 2 minute penalty, nothing more and the instigator will be rescinded as they always are. Why would Bieksa get suspended?
|
Bieksa is lucky they didn't call instigating because he was punching Ferland in the face while he was digging for the puck. There's plenty of evidence to support that the Canucks were out to injure Flames star players.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:17 PM
|
#32
|
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
I think only Hamhuis gets suspended
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:18 PM
|
#33
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
|
Hamhuis should. Dirty hit to the head of one of our most effective players. Deserves a game. Wouldn't surprise me if the league doesn't though.
__________________
A few weeks after crashing head-first into the boards (denting his helmet and being unable to move for a little while) following a hit from behind by Bob Errey, the Calgary Flames player explains:
"I was like Christ, lying on my back, with my arms outstretched, crucified"
-- Frank Musil - Early January 1994
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Igottago For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:20 PM
|
#34
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Bieksa, definitely. So fricken dirty. Hamuis should be if it was a regular season game. Burrows no, as much as I hate the guy.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:20 PM
|
#35
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Please don't. Justice needs to be served.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:20 PM
|
#36
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Bieksa is lucky they didn't call instigating because he was punching Ferland in the face while he was digging for the puck. There's plenty of evidence to support that the Canucks were out to injure Flames star players.
|
But they didn't call it and he didn't do anything of note to get suspended otherwise. He is a pretty big liability on the ice at this point in his career anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:21 PM
|
#37
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
I think Hamhuis has a good chance of being suspended 1 game, but I can't see Burrows suspended. They'll rescind it like they did with Engy.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:21 PM
|
#38
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I want ferland tailing the Sedins next game
MOD EDIT: 'The Sedins' is good enough. Leave the other stuff out, thanks.
Last edited by KootenayFlamesFan; 04-20-2015 at 10:16 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:22 PM
|
#39
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
I think only Hamhuis gets suspended
|
Agreed.
Deliberate hit to head, initial point of contact.
The instigator gets rescinded
|
|
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 11:22 PM
|
#40
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
|
Hamhuis should, not the others.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.
|
|
