03-20-2015, 01:17 PM
|
#261
|
All I can get
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Waitasec - we are all too excited. I just read on the HF Oiler board that this guy is no big deal.
Note - read only the last few pages of the thread for that opinion.
|
Ahh... but here's the rub:
Forum devoted to discussing NO GOOD is, by extension, also NO GOOD.
__________________
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 01:25 PM
|
#262
|
Franchise Player
|
Interview from Fan 960:
http://www.sportsnet.ca/960/calgary-...was-too-great/
Pat Steinberg did a great job with this one as Morrison wasn't overly talkative at the start. Steinberg got him through.
I found it interesting that he said he went to Western Michigan because of Andy Murray, and that Andy Murray prepared all the players to move on after college. Sounds like it was a great experience.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 01:52 PM
|
#263
|
Could Care Less
|
Funny rationalization happening on HF Oilers about this.
Went from being a good prospect with a booming shot that was going to be fed by RNH and Yakupov (?) on the PP, to a meh prospect that will get buried in the AHL and only chose the Flames because the Oilers are so deep.
Never change oilers.
|
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
1991 Canadian,
BigErnSalute_16,
Burner,
C-ero,
Cheese,
DaQwiz,
dino7c,
Money Baer,
Mony,
Neeper,
Robo,
SHOGUN,
StAlbertFlame,
Steveyoto
|
03-20-2015, 02:01 PM
|
#264
|
Norm!
|
I look at the Oilers blueline prospect depth and outside of Nurse who I believe is going to need a year at least in the AHL because while he has some really good physical tools needs to work on his instincts for the position. And Marincin who's not great.
They have a whole bunch of meh on their prospects depth chart.
Simpson is interesting
But after that they have meh.
Musil is fairly high on their prospect depth chart but he's a bust waiting to happen.
Outside of that I see a bunch of bottom pairings at best. I don't see where they have a great future on the blueline outside of Nurse.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 02:05 PM
|
#265
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Outside of that I see a bunch of bottom pairings at best. I don't see where they have a great future on the blueline outside of Nurse.
|
I think you're forgetting future Norris Trophy winner, Justin Schultz. It's not a question of "if" he wins, but "when", and "how many".
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-20-2015, 02:09 PM
|
#266
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
It wouldn't be bad if they could develop players.
Klefbom
Marincin
Nurse
Schultz
That is decent depth to start.
They also seem to really like that Laleggia kid who just won a bunch of awards.
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/p...php?pid=122191
Get a top 3 pick and add Hanifin to that and they are in decent shape.
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 02:09 PM
|
#267
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I look at the Oilers blueline prospect depth and outside of Nurse who I believe is going to need a year at least in the AHL because while he has some really good physical tools needs to work on his instincts for the position. And Marincin who's not great.
They have a whole bunch of meh on their prospects depth chart.
Simpson is interesting
But after that they have meh.
Musil is fairly high on their prospect depth chart but he's a bust waiting to happen.
Outside of that I see a bunch of bottom pairings at best. I don't see where they have a great future on the blueline outside of Nurse.
|
Some of their comments assumed they have Hanifin. Which is funny in several ways.
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 02:57 PM
|
#268
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
|
Now lets go out and get Casey Bailey from Penn State who was at our dev camp this summer and Austin Matthews from the USNTDP.
That would be amazing. I seriously doubt Matthews comes here because he is a center but I think we have a good shot at Casey Bailey. One of the top scorers in college this season and hes a big strong RWer who can score. I'd love it.
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 02:58 PM
|
#269
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpy-Gunt
Now lets go out and get Casey Bailey from Penn State who was at our dev camp this summer and Austin Matthews from the USNTDP.
That would be amazing. I seriously doubt Matthews comes here because he is a center but I think we have a good shot at Casey Bailey. One of the top scorers in college this season and hes a big strong RWer who can score. I'd love it.
|
Austin Matthews is the early favourite for 1st OA in the 2016 draft. You can't just sign him. The Oilers can try but they are the Oilers.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-20-2015, 03:00 PM
|
#270
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpy-Gunt
Now lets go out and get Casey Bailey from Penn State who was at our dev camp this summer and Austin Matthews from the USNTDP.
That would be amazing. I seriously doubt Matthews comes here because he is a center but I think we have a good shot at Casey Bailey. One of the top scorers in college this season and hes a big strong RWer who can score. I'd love it.
|
Mac-T, is that you?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-20-2015, 03:05 PM
|
#271
|
In the Sin Bin
|
One thing that helps us in this regard is the number of college guys we have drafted, traded for or signed in recent years. These guys talk to each other, and they know how organizations treat people.
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 04:52 PM
|
#272
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NB
|
From all reports Casey Bailey is Buffalo's to lose, at this point. However we are also in the running.
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 05:02 PM
|
#273
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Are the Flames in good shape with regard to the contract limit? Love signing these free assets, but are we getting close to 50?
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 05:03 PM
|
#274
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
Are the Flames in good shape with regard to the contract limit? Love signing these free assets, but are we getting close to 50?
|
we haven't signed a guy for this season. Morrisons deal starts next season and Yemenko only signed an ATO in Adirondack. We're at 44 contracts right now I believe ... nhlnumbers have 48 contracts listed, and 4 contracts are sliding (Bennett, Poirier, Klimchuk and Kanzig).
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 05:06 PM
|
#275
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
Are the Flames in good shape with regard to the contract limit? Love signing these free assets, but are we getting close to 50?
|
Believe they are at 44, assuming all the ELCs that can slide slide.
Morrison's contract does not start until next season so it doesn't count til next season.
Yevenko doesn't even have a contract.
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 08:34 PM
|
#276
|
First Line Centre
|
Flames Contracts Going Into Next Season:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
Are the Flames in good shape with regard to the contract limit?
|
Lots of room...
27 current contracts on the books for next year... plus 8 likely RFA's only puts us at 35 contracts.
1. Hudler
2. Jones
3. Raymond
4. Stajan
5. Gaudreau
6. Monahan
7. Bennett
8. Colborne
9. Bollig
10. Granlund
11. Poirier
12. Klimchuk
13. Van Brabant
14. Wideman
15. Giordano
16. Smid
17. Engelland
18. Russell
19. Brodie
20. Morrison
21. Wotherspoon
22. Sieloff
23. Kanzig
24. Kulak
25. Culkin
26. Hiller
27. Ortio
Likely RFA's to be signed
1. Backlund
2. Jooris
3. Bouma
4. Byron
5. Ferland
6. Shore
7. Wolf
8. Arnold
Probably still up in the air if Calgary re-signs the following UFA's & RFA's...
Ramo
Diaz
Schlemko
Potter
Reinhart
Agostino
Hanowski
Elson
Ramage
Cundari
Acolatse
Hathaway could be in line for a contract according to some too!
|
|
|
03-20-2015, 08:53 PM
|
#277
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
Funny rationalization happening on HF Oilers about this.
Went from being a good prospect with a booming shot that was going to be fed by RNH and Yakupov (?) on the PP, to a meh prospect that will get buried in the AHL and only chose the Flames because the Oilers are so deep.
Never change oilers.
|
I was looking at HF as well. Some pretty funny stuff going on over there. They are convinced that a Colorado type collapse is inevitable for the Flames next year.
I think it is great that these young prospects are jumping on board. These kids (and their advisors) can see an organization that is headed in the right direction.
|
|
|
03-21-2015, 05:20 AM
|
#278
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
^
I also read through all of that on HF, and found myself puzzling, "who cares?" There are several posters over there that are clinging to the hope that the Flames regress next season—as if that has some sort of bearing on the Oilers' future.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I think I have come to terms with the possibility of that occurring, and have concluded that it doesn't at all matter. Even if the Flames stumble next year (and I am not convinced about this happening), they still have an incredibly bright future...
· They still have two budding star forwards Monahan and Gaudreau already playing in the NHL
· They still have a couple of great surprise prospects who have already exceeded expectations by a country mile in Jooris and Bouma
· They still have underrated players in the mid-20s age bracket in Brodie and Backlund
· They still have a handful of young prospects that are on the cusp of making the team in Granlund, Ferland, Shore, Poirier, and with more in the pipeline in the next couple of years in Arnold and Klimchuk
· They still have a drafted phenom in Bennett, who looks like he could end up being the best player on the team when all is said and done
· They still have NHL calibre goaltenders and defensemen heading into next season
Who the hell cares that much about what happens next year, in the light of everything else that is happening? I laugh.
|
|
|
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
1991 Canadian,
Antithesis,
apiquard,
Azhouse,
Calgary4LIfe,
Cheese,
dash_pinched,
Enoch Root,
foshizzle11,
Frank MetaMusil,
getbak,
gonzo29,
handgroen,
Itse,
megatron,
Mony,
Neeper,
Steveyoto,
Street Pharmacist,
the2bears,
Zevo
|
03-21-2015, 09:05 AM
|
#279
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azhouse
I was looking at HF as well. Some pretty funny stuff going on over there. They are convinced that a Colorado type collapse is inevitable for the Flames next year.
I think it is great that these young prospects are jumping on board. These kids (and their advisors) can see an organization that is headed in the right direction.
|
The Colorado example has always been a bad one because they completely relied on goaltending. He won the vezina trophy for god's sake. If he can play that well again than any team is dangerous but their eggs are in one basket.
The Flames are still dead center with a .911 save percentage. The epitome of average goaltending. The only playoff teams behind Calgary in terms of goaltending are the Islanders, Canucks and Ducks.
Calgary is shooting percentage and shot blocks.
The shooting percentage thing: if you take out Calgary's top line they are actually under the NHL average in shooting percentage. Hudler has had a career of a higher than average shooting percentage so he's proven, and therefore sustainable for next year. Monahan has done it in both seasons in the NHL, but sample size lacks the foundation to suggest it's a given. Gaudreau is a rookie but certainly the type of player that you'd expect to have a high shooting percentage. Other than that others are high, but every team has high shooting percentage players or we wouldn't have an average.
So that handles PDO
The Corsi/Fenwick battle will be interesting because the Flames seem to play a style that breaks outside the conventional wisdom of how to win hockey games. Yielding the perimeter and racking up blocked shots is certainly giving up possession, but time will tell if its calculated and a new way to win, or if it's playing with fire (100 game sample) and heading to disaster.
I'm starting to think the Flames don't fit well in the advanced stats categories because of this, and they'll end up doing a version of it again next season.
Biggest fear for me isn't the style of play, but the gumption it takes to keep doing it. If they lose that effort it won't work.
I'm guessing it's a great way to stop gap a team until your young talent takes over.
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
anyonebutedmonton,
apiquard,
BloodFetish,
Calgary4LIfe,
getbak,
IamNotKenKing,
Jay Random,
Mony,
Phanuthier,
Street Pharmacist,
Tilley,
Zevo
|
03-21-2015, 09:06 AM
|
#280
|
Disenfranchised
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
I don't know about the rest of you, but I think I have come to terms with the possibility of that occurring, and have concluded that it doesn't at all matter. Even if the Flames stumble next year (and I am not convinced about this happening), they still have an incredibly bright future...
(...)
Who the hell cares that much about what happens next year, in the light of everything else that is happening? I laugh.
|
Couldn't agree more with your thoughts here. I can't imagine there are many Flames fans who haven't acknowledged the possibility that they might take a step back next year as this year's success largely came out of nowhere. I mean, I know that they had really improved at the end of last season but it would have been reasonable to assume that was due to a young team playing better with less pressure on them.
To great extent, (almost) everything has gone right for the Flames this year and I'm probably missing something but the only major thing that's gone against them has been the injury to Giordano. The list of things that have gone right is very long. I mean, you have to laugh/shake your head at the combination of losing your captain and best player for the season, and doing a rebuilding-type move in sending out Glencross, all the while maintaining the same pace from earlier in the season.
Either way, no matter what happens this season and next, I love watching this team. It's been an absolute blast.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.
|
|