Violent Sex Offender on lam in Alberta

[killer_carlson]

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/...127/story.html
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/ed...127/story.html


He's apparently supposed to be in Edmonton, but they have no idea where he is. Take a look and be sure to report it if you see him.

From the article:

Documents from the National Parole Board paint a picture of Natomagan as a dangerous and violent offender who has benefited little from programs or counselling, and has “a high degree of comfort with (his) sexual deviant behaviour.”

...

A recent psychological assessment referenced by the board described Natomagan as highly impulsive, with substance abuse issues, little respect toward his previous victims, and a lack of remorse. The documents say he has no support in the community, and has shown poor compliance with supervision.

...

Natomagan has more than 60 previous criminal convictions. The most serious relates to a brutal 2002 attack on a sleeping 10-year-old child, who was sexually assaulted and choked unconscious. The child was seriously injured in the attack.

[Schraderbrau]

Thanks for the heads up on this guy.

You have to ask; how does someone with this type of background get out at all?....

[Flamenspiel]

^^60 convictions? what on earth is this guy doing out of jail? I am starting to like the idea of 35 years before parole. The parole system is completely unaccountable.

[killer_carlson]

The biggest concern to me is that there is a guy:

with a high degree of comfort with his deviant sexual behavior
with substance abuse issues
with no support in the community
with a history of attacking children and random victims
who has poor compliance with supervision and is currently on the run


it's a ticking bomb.

[Reaper]

Originally Posted by Flamenspiel

^^60 convictions? what on earth is this guy doing out of jail? I am starting to like the idea of 35 years before parole. The parole system is completely unaccountable.

This has nothing to do with the parole system. The guy served his entire sentence. If you want to talk sentencing that is a different conversation.

[octothorp]

Originally Posted by Reaper

This has nothing to do with the parole system. The guy served his entire sentence. If you want to talk sentencing that is a different conversation.

Yup. Or more specifically, talk 'dangerous offender tag and when it should and shouldn't be applied'. The DO tag, in this case, would have allowed the parole board to look at whether he had a high likelihood of reoffending, and choose to keep him imprisoned. Based on the parole board's description of him, it seems highly unlikely that they would have let him out if they had the power to keep him (which they didn't).

From what I can tell, the crown applied to have this guy tagged as a dangerous offender back in 2012; the judge overruled, the crown appealed, and the appeal was dismissed. IMO, the blame in this lies with the original judge in not applying the DO tag, despite strong evidence from the court-appointed psychologist that he was in high percentiles in multiple tests that indicated likelihood to re-offend. The judge ruled that there was 'reasonable possibility of eventual control of the risk in the community', and that this was enough to classify him not as a DO, but as a Long Term Offender.

http://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skca/doc...012skca46.html

[MacDaddy77]

please ensure the thread title gets updated once he's caught! I have passed this on the friends and family with kids so I'd also like to advise them when he's caught

Thanks

[Huntingwhale]

Well so much for rehabilitation.

[rubecube]

Originally Posted by Huntingwhale

Well so much for rehabilitation.

Yeah, some people can't be rehabilitated. No reason for not applying the DO to this guy and keeping him in prison. These are the types of decisions that judges should be held accountable for.

[4X4]

Fricken BS. He's convicted in 2002 for beating and raping a 10 year old, only gets four years for that, then in 2008, he does it again to a 16 year old, and only gets five years?

See, it's stuff like this that makes me angry about the weak justice system we have. For all the threads we've got here on this site where we debate what's fair, it's cases like this where IMO, the first rape should have been more like 10+ years, and the second one should have resulted in life in prison. IDGAF about rehabilitating someone like this. This is a guy I'd rather got tortured in the general population in the worst prison we have.

F*** that guy. He shouldn't be free. Never.

[rubecube]

^^ Agreed. When they say that the guy is very comfortable with his behaviour and shows no remorse, that to me says he should never see the light of day.

[northcrunk]

Originally Posted by 4X4

Fricken BS. He's convicted in 2002 for beating and raping a 10 year old, only gets four years for that, then in 2008, he does it again to a 16 year old, and only gets five years?

See, it's stuff like this that makes me angry about the weak justice system we have. For all the threads we've got here on this site where we debate what's fair, it's cases like this where IMO, the first rape should have been more like 10+ years, and the second one should have resulted in life in prison. IDGAF about rehabilitating someone like this. This is a guy I'd rather got tortured in the general population in the worst prison we have.

F*** that guy. He shouldn't be free. Never.

No he shouldn't. I would welcome public floggings as well for these perverts.

[rubecube]

I guess I also have to ask why our government passed a massive crime bill that upped sentencing for growing pot but did nothing to change punishments for violent sexual assaults. Really shocking priorities, IMO.

[chedder]

Easy solution. He should get to live right next to the original judge who wouldn't deem him a dangerous offender.

[polak]

The fact that this guy got out at all is a massive failure of the justice system.

[To Be Quite Honest]

Exile to a prison Island. The movies got it right.

[Yasa]

Originally Posted by To Be Quite Honest

Exile to a prison Island. The movies got it right.

The problem with Prison Island is that it's just a name. It's really a peninsula.

[stampsx2]

Originally Posted by chedder

Easy solution. He should get to live right next to the original judge who wouldn't deem him a dangerous offender.

Absolutely. It should be law.

[Flames_Gimp]

perfect candidate for a firing squad

[cam_wmh]

Has Dexter spawned any imitators?