Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Playoff bound?
Yes 215 81.75%
No 48 18.25%
Voters: 263. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2015, 11:21 AM   #41
skudr248
First Line Centre
 
skudr248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winchestertonfieldville Jail
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Do you consider Colorado last year a rebuilding team?

I would just on the fact they picked 1st overall.
Colorado was not a rebuilding team.. they tanked. Very hard, just look at their line up that year, amazing the tank that went on there the second half of the season.
skudr248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 11:45 AM   #42
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Do you consider Colorado last year a rebuilding team?

I would just on the fact they picked 1st overall.
Colorado had a decent team, they tanked hard towards the last half of the month to get a good pick. They were 41-35-6 in the 11/12 season.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 12:02 PM   #43
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I'm older and less superstition now!
Me too. They have defied the odds/conventional logic all year. Playoffs. There, I said it. Playoffs. [and not in the whiny Jim Mora voice]

It is all house money here on in. To be part of the race, win or lose, will be awesome.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 12:08 PM   #44
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I voted no because I didn't feel they played that well over the road trip despite coming out of it with a winning record. That combined with the fact that they seem to get absolutely no help on the OOT scoreboard most nights tells me this will go down to the wire. Really though they have been proving me wrong all year so I'm very happy letting them continue the trend.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 12:11 PM   #45
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

I continue to doubt and they continue to prove me wrong. I will be voting no in the hopes that that trend continues.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 12:13 PM   #46
BigRed
#1 Goaltender
 
BigRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

The numbers say yes, but the numbers when the season began had them as contenders in the McDavid sweepstakes, so I'm not gonna predict - just hope and pray.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temporary_User View Post
I will eat a pubic hair if Giordano ever plays in the NHL again
BigRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 01:00 PM   #47
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

I think there's an important difference between this year and 2004. This year, if we miss the playoffs, the future should only get brighter. While it will be disappointing to miss, this season is a resounding success whether we play past game 82 or not.

In 2004 we definitely did not have the talent on the horizon we do now. That, and some of our most important contributors are under 25 this year (and well under for many of them).
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 01:10 PM   #48
Bezer
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Bezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: H E double hockey sticks
Exp:
Default

As much as I have doubted this team at points this season and they end up proving me wrong I am still unsure. Losing Gio really hurts even if we don't see how much because we have winning. I really hope they do it but it won't be easy.

And if they do make it I suspect that they will make a really strong push to win a round or two.

Either way it has been a fantastic last couple of seasons. Even though they picked 4th, last year I always felt they were in games and the effort was always there. The same with this year, maybe they are "out talented" in games but it is very rare that they are ever " out worked". On top of all that they have young developing talent and a high end prospect (Bennett) making strides for next year.
Bezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 01:12 PM   #49
Cflames_12.5
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Cflames_12.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Ducks L
Leafs W
@ Avs W
Blues OTL
Flyers W
CBJ W
Avs W
Stars W
@ Wild L
@ Preds L
@ Stars W
@ blues L
@ Oilers W
Coyotes W
Kings L
@ Jets W

98 points.
The last game vs The Jets could be for the final wild card.
Cflames_12.5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 01:15 PM   #50
Obsidian
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: May 2014
Exp:
Default

Voted yes, (and hate jinx-laden stuff like this), because they are just the most stubborn team in the league and simply will not, at any point over the remaining 16 games, give up on their goal. Their willpower and great conditioning will see them through. You know you're training right when you can put up a record 24 shots on net in a third period, at the end of your season-long 7 game, 14 day road trip, to come all the way back from 4-0. The current Sharks, Kings, Wild, Jets or Canucks simply would not do that in any regular season game.
Obsidian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 01:30 PM   #51
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

I voted no, unfortunately.
1 of these 5 teams has to drop out:

Vancouver 80
Calgary 77
Minnesota 79
Winnipeg 78
Los Angeles 75 (+1 game in hand over everyone)

Vancouver, IMO, is too far ahead to fall out. Minnesota has been scorching hot for 20 games. Los Angeles won't miss... they're just doing their usual regular season rope-a-dope.

It's down to us, or Winnipeg, for who misses. They're 1 point up... We have the benefit of playing in the weaker division... And we're both missing our best defenders. Guess it really is a toss up at this point between these 2 teams.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
Old 03-10-2015, 01:34 PM   #52
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I voted no because I didn't feel they played that well over the road trip despite coming out of it with a winning record. That combined with the fact that they seem to get absolutely no help on the OOT scoreboard most nights tells me this will go down to the wire. Really though they have been proving me wrong all year so I'm very happy letting them continue the trend.
I am kind of in this boat too. The OOT scoreboard to me is the most concerning thing since these other teams just don't seem to lose.

They need to win 9 or 10 games. If you look at the schedule that just means it likely comes down to the last 2 games of the season.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 03-10-2015 at 01:37 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 01:47 PM   #53
Loyal and True
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

I voted no, only because we have a couple more mountains to climb before I can vote yes. It's gonna be very close. 7 of next 8 games at home and hopefully they can win 5 or 6 and then I'll vote yes. We need to beat the teams we "should" be beating in the next 2 weeks.
Loyal and True is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 02:00 PM   #54
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

I voted no.
Because corsi
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
Old 03-10-2015, 02:02 PM   #55
SOMBRI2
First Line Centre
 
SOMBRI2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: YYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Remember in the spring of 2004 when the word "playoffs" was banned until we clinched? We probably should do that this time around too.
Was it until the second last game or so when we clinched?
SOMBRI2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 02:07 PM   #56
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

No we clinched against Pheonix a couple weeks before.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 02:15 PM   #57
Rhettzky
Franchise Player
 
Rhettzky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
Exp:
Default

Our schedule from here on out looks pretty promising to me. Like our chances.

Remaining Games

Home Games: 9 - Ducks, Leafs, Blues, Flyers, Jackets, Avs, Stars, Coyotes, Kings.

Away Games: 7 - Avs, Wild, Preds, Stars, Blues, Oilers, Jets.

Against current top 3 division teams: 4

Against wildcard teams: 2

Against bottom 4 teams in each conference: 8

Against non-playoff teams: 2

Back-to-backs: 2
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
Rhettzky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 02:15 PM   #58
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
I voted no, unfortunately.
1 of these 5 teams has to drop out:

Vancouver 80
Calgary 77
Minnesota 79
Winnipeg 78
Los Angeles 75 (+1 game in hand over everyone)

Vancouver, IMO, is too far ahead to fall out. Minnesota has been scorching hot for 20 games. Los Angeles won't miss... they're just doing their usual regular season rope-a-dope.

It's down to us, or Winnipeg, for who misses. They're 1 point up... We have the benefit of playing in the weaker division... And we're both missing our best defenders. Guess it really is a toss up at this point between these 2 teams.
Good analysis, I share all of your views except for the conclusion. I think we're better than Winnipeg in every facet and it will show at the end of the year. Also I cling to a faint hope that Vancouver will somehow #### the bed without their #1 goalie.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 02:16 PM   #59
Party Elephant
First Line Centre
 
Party Elephant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
No we clinched against Pheonix a couple weeks before.
It was the third last game of the season, and last home game.
Party Elephant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 02:20 PM   #60
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Hmm really? I seem to remember it being a bit before the end of the season.

I remember it pretty well though. Listening to the radio lying on my bed while my dad was in my room playing Civilization (only computer was in my room).

Memories...
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy