03-05-2015, 10:38 AM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speede5
It's a power trip, I'll play along because I have to, but these guys have a tendency to power trip. Might as well get used to the erosion of privacy. Harper's gonna be around for a while and it will only get worse.
|
I don't think that this has anything to do with whose in power at the time. Its the nature of the world these days.
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 10:45 AM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speede5
It's a power trip, I'll play along because I have to, but these guys have a tendency to power trip. Might as well get used to the erosion of privacy. Harper's gonna be around for a while and it will only get worse.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
Do you frequently get sent for a secondary search by CBSA?
I can honestly say I have never had a second look at me or my customs declaration card. No grief, no bag searching, no phone searching.
|
Yeah I agree. I have never been stopped, searched, or had a second look anytime I have crossed the border. Where I am with my family, driving, at the airport, alone or with buddies, sober/drunk/hungover, never.
I wonder if the CBSA are actually trained to identify possible risks....I wonder...
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 10:50 AM
|
#23
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:  
|
As I also clearly watch Border Security too much, this seems to the case law that the CBSA will site if you refuse to provide the password. Stems from a truck driver in Ontario who was caught with child porn on his laptop while crossing the border. In one episode of Border Security, a CBSA supervisor actually printed this decision to show to the traveller.
http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/0...-oncj-25.shtml
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 10:53 AM
|
#24
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
I personally don't like the search regulations but it is what it is.
Cameron asked an interesting question in the first post though. Regarding search and access to phones, tablets and computers do you only have to provide access (unlock) the device or do you have to provide access to all personal files and communications on that device? I wonder if there is an app that could basically lock access to all apps, messages and files while providing access to the device?
|
This case will determine if you need to provide the password, it has never been tested in court before. I predict that the ruling will be that the CBSA retains the authority to examine electronic devices and that they can ask the owner to provide the password. If the password is not provided, they can seize the device until the password can be broken or a warrant secured to compel compliance. Again, just a prediction, not the law as it stands.
They just do a cursory inspection of pictures/files/texts/anything easy to find. Accessing locked or encrypted apps hasn't been tested in court either, but it would stand to reason that the ruling would follow general device access.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodlebug
As I also clearly watch Border Security too much, this seems to the case law that the CBSA will site if you refuse to provide the password. Stems from a truck driver in Ontario who was caught with child porn on his laptop while crossing the border. In one episode of Border Security, a CBSA supervisor actually printed this decision to show to the traveller.
http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/0...-oncj-25.shtml
|
Leask deals with the authority of the CBSA to conduct searches in the first place, there is no mention of a password on the laptop in question or Leask being asked to provide one.
Last edited by llwhiteoutll; 03-05-2015 at 10:58 AM.
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 11:04 AM
|
#25
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:  
|
I've been pulled aside in the secondary checkup twice. First time I was asked to unlock my phone and went through it. I don't take pictures or videos but managed to have one from the wedding in the dominican I went to. Pretty sure that saved me from a lot more hassle. I didn't have anything to hide but it still feels like a violation to me. This was all because I don't like checking baggage and went for 10 days with a carry on.
__________________
Geology rocks but geography is where it's at
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 01:38 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
|
BlackBerry Enterprise Server-activated devices have this awesome feature called 'Duress notification' where if you're forced to unlock your device against your will, a notification goes out immediately to an e-mail address (person, distribution list, etc.). Theoretically, someone could enter their password in duress mode, and their work administrator could lock and wipe the device right then and there.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 01:46 PM
|
#27
|
Likes Cartoons
|
Can this happen, say, if it my phone is a company phone containing proprietary information and highly sensitive documents? My company is a global giant and treat these issues very seriously. We are instructed (and have signed) contractual agreements that our phone's password cannot be divulged or phone gained access to third parties.
What would happen under these circumstances?
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 01:58 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Maybe the password was something embarrassing. I had problems with my AMEX a while ago and had to give up my password to the rep. It was kind of embarrassing to tell her that my password was "6969".
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:12 PM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city
Foreign nationals is one thing, but why are they going through the phones of Canadian citizens?
|
Good point. Canadians would never smuggle things into canada or have illegal documents on their computers.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
 <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:14 PM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speede5
It's a power trip, I'll play along because I have to, but these guys have a tendency to power trip. Might as well get used to the erosion of privacy. Harper's gonna be around for a while and it will only get worse.
|
Why is it that any time rank and file officers do their duty and actually try to enforce laws people automatically call it a power trip.
These guys have a tough job, some are good, some are bad, but blanket statements like that are just silly.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
 <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bring_Back_Shantz For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:18 PM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheyCallMeBruce
Can this happen, say, if it my phone is a company phone containing proprietary information and highly sensitive documents? My company is a global giant and treat these issues very seriously. We are instructed (and have signed) contractual agreements that our phone's password cannot be divulged or phone gained access to third parties.
What would happen under these circumstances?
|
Well if unlocking your phone for CBSA staff will get you fired, then you shouldn't carry it across the border.
Aside from that, that agreement doesn't hold any water as far as the CBSA is concerned. If your employer made you sign an agreement saying you couldn't divulge any illegal operations within the company, that wouldn't hold up either.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
 <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:22 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz
Good point. Canadians would never smuggle things into canada or have illegal documents on their computers.
|
I guess I find the entire thing moot in the age of the internet.
I can understand foreign nationals who are lying about working or how long they plan on staying.
Outside of hiding something in the body of the phone, what should the CBSA be looking for in the phone of a citizen? Child porn or drug information sure, but other than that?
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:25 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city
I guess I find the entire thing moot in the age of the internet.
I can understand foreign nationals who are lying about working or how long they plan on staying.
Outside of hiding something in the body of the phone, what should the CBSA be looking for in the phone of a citizen? Child porn or drug information sure, but other than that?
|
Yeah, exactly. You just gave two examples of data that they could/should check for. Kind of defeats your argument that the whole thing is moot, doesn't it?
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
 <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:26 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz
Yeah, exactly. You just gave two examples of data that they could/should check for. Kind of defeats your argument that the whole thing is moot, doesn't it?
|
Not really. Anyone with a shred of intelligence would wipe it from the devices prior to crossing the border. Isn't the border guards job to prevent the inflow of illegal items? If there is no border on electronic information its kind of pointless.
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:30 PM
|
#35
|
Likes Cartoons
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz
Well if unlocking your phone for CBSA staff will get you fired, then you shouldn't carry it across the border.
Aside from that, that agreement doesn't hold any water as far as the CBSA is concerned. If your employer made you sign an agreement saying you couldn't divulge any illegal operations within the company, that wouldn't hold up either.
|
So you're saying people don't travel cross border with your laptop and phones for business?
What illegal operation? Proprietary data isn't illegal. What I'm asking is, is there a procedure people can follow should something like that occur?
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:47 PM
|
#36
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by temple5
But I would under no circumstances unlock any electronic device for anyone - if they asked I would put the password wrong 10x to reset the device and lose whatever I had rather than have some high school graduate look through my items.
|
This is actually pretty damn smart.
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 02:50 PM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
This is actually pretty damn smart.
|
Till you get detained for obstruction.
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 04:07 PM
|
#38
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Oh man, an old childhood friend of mine is a CBSA agent. If they let people like him look through your personal electronics, that is just sad.
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 04:12 PM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city
Not really. Anyone with a shred of intelligence would wipe it from the devices prior to crossing the border. Isn't the border guards job to prevent the inflow of illegal items? If there is no border on electronic information its kind of pointless.
|
Yeah, except that the fact that they catch people with illegal stuff on their computers would seem to indicate that perhaps the kinds of people that are in possesion of that type of data aren't particuarly intelligent.
Just because there is another way of sending that data across borders, and just because you can't stop the problem competely doens't mean you shouldn't have the tools to prevent at least some of it, and to catch some of the folks who are using, producing and/or transporting it.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
 <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
|
|
|
03-05-2015, 04:15 PM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
Because Canadian citizens can still be involved in illegal activity?
I would bet the CBSA agent suspected him of smuggling something into the country.
|
In his phone? Their job is to make sure I'm not bringing anything in illegal on my person, that's it full stop. They want to be cops they need to be held to the same account cops are, ie go get a warrant.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.
|
|