Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2015, 11:03 AM   #1
jar_e
Franchise Player
 
jar_e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default Conservatives want new law creating life sentences with no parole

Just from a 660 News email...

Quote:
The Harper government says it plans to introduce legislation that would keep what it calls "Canada's most heinous criminals" behind bars for life with no chance of parole.
Thoughts? I guess it matters what we're defining as "heinous criminals" but I'd imagine this is similar to Dangerous Offender Status here already....which they already can keep people remanded.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangerous_offender

Quote:
In Canadian criminal law, a convicted person who is designated a dangerous offender may be subjected to an indeterminate prison sentence, whether or not the crime carries a life sentence, but this does not apply to convictions of first degree murder, second degree murder, high treason, and treason.[1] The purpose of the legislation is to detain offenders who are deemed too dangerous to be released into society because of their violent tendencies, but whose sentences would not necessarily keep them incarcerated under other legislation, such as the Correctional and Conditional Release Act.
jar_e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 11:05 AM   #2
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Long time overdue.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 11:06 AM   #3
dino7c
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale View Post
Long time overdue.
agree, people that a constantly putting the public at risk don't deserve to live in free society
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 11:08 AM   #4
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Seems pretty superfluous but I'll wait until more details come out.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2015, 11:16 AM   #5
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

They better add some specificity to this law.

Broad interpretations to laws like this is a slippery slope if we ever get a PM with the wrong intentions.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2015, 11:23 AM   #6
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Yeah, I guess the question is whether this is basically streamlining and cleaning up what Dangerous Offender Status entails, or whether it is creating an entirely new category of criminal.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 11:26 AM   #7
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Far stretch I know, but if all of the sudden we start using this law on "traitors" and the like...

Well, that's Putin some scary thoughts in my head.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 11:28 AM   #8
FLAMESRULE
First Line Centre
 
FLAMESRULE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The centre of everything
Exp:
Default

Another idiotic piece of legislation from the PC's that panders to knuckle draggers. There is no need for "no chance of parole" laws.

What needs to happen is more money and resources spent on rehab / mental health treatment / prevention etc.
FLAMESRULE is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to FLAMESRULE For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2015, 11:31 AM   #9
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

I'm for this law depending on how its executed.

The problem with the dangerous offender law is that the term is not defined.

If this is to be used for multiple time violent offenders, or multiple murderers for example go to it.

I need more information first.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 11:36 AM   #10
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

I'm willing to bet that this ends up being worded, and used, in much the same way as the existing dangerous offender legislation. This reeks of pandering and literally taking a law already in existence and renaming it to seem tough on crime.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2015, 11:37 AM   #11
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLAMESRULE View Post
Another idiotic piece of legislation from the PC's that panders to knuckle draggers. There is no need for "no chance of parole" laws.

What needs to happen is more money and resources spent on rehab / mental health treatment / prevention etc.
Agreed, with your 2nd statement, but I don't think anyone should have an issue with guys like Paul Bernardo never having a chance at parole, no matter how much he may or may not have reformed, nor should any resources be spent on his "rehabilitation".
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaramonLS For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2015, 11:47 AM   #12
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Need more info.

My sister works in corrections and has dealt with some of the worst offenders. Some times the only thing that keeps them somewhat behaving in prison is the thought that they might get out early. The faint hope you give them serves a purpose.

You need something you can take away still.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 03-04-2015 at 12:16 PM.
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2015, 12:09 PM   #13
1stLand
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The only people who are against life sentences with no parole, are people with Criminal Minds that can see themselves committing a serious crime.
1stLand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 12:10 PM   #14
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Why are they so intent on making people think our world is so dangerous?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2015, 12:11 PM   #15
Dan02
Franchise Player
 
Dan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1stLand View Post
The only people who are against life sentences with no parole, are people with Criminal Minds that can see themselves committing a serious crime.
I gonna respectfully disagree with that, read the post above yours.
Dan02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dan02 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2015, 12:17 PM   #16
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
The faint hope you give them serves a purpose.
As much as I'd like to see guys like Bernardo and Olson locked away forever, you make an excellent point. If you take somebody who is sentenced to spend life in maximum security, what incentive does that person have to not go around assaulting or even killing guards?
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 12:19 PM   #17
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan02 View Post
I gonna respectfully disagree with that, read the post above yours.
I thought the implied green text was obvious, myself.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 12:20 PM   #18
White Out 403
Franchise Player
 
White Out 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Why are they so intent on making people think our world is so dangerous?
because, 9-11
__________________
White Out 403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 12:22 PM   #19
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

I thought the implication of green text was nullified by the particular poster in this case. I could be wrong though.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 12:22 PM   #20
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLAMESRULE View Post
...
What needs to happen is more money and resources spent on rehab / mental health treatment / prevention etc.
Is there any credible data reporting in each/any one of the areas you have listed that provides good correlation between levels of spending and re-occurring crimes?
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy