02-27-2015, 01:21 AM
|
#161
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Around the world
|
Columbus ownership must be doing cartwheels after getting rid of Horton. His contract is for $37 million and he had only played 36 games for them - that's over $1 million per game if he had remained a Blue Jacket until retirement.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 02:11 AM
|
#162
|
Help, save, whatever.
|
Both players signed in the 2013 offseason
Horton 36 games played 5 14 19
Clarkson 118 games played 15 11 26
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to savemedrzaius For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-27-2015, 02:47 AM
|
#163
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
The trade is budget relief for cap relief.
Interesting deal, have we seen something like this before?
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 04:41 AM
|
#164
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:  
|
Glad Calgary didn't get in on this. All this talk of how great it would be to get a high pick for 26.1 million is insane imo. If you want to improve your team with 26.1 million put it into scouting.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:03 AM
|
#165
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
I know it frees cap space, but since the Leafs do still have to actually pay the salary (it's uninsured) basically they are preferring to pay a guy to do nothing than to pay Clarkson to play.
Media is speculating as to whether this and the other recent moves are Nonis' or if he is just signing papers for Shanahan's moves.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:07 AM
|
#166
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
The trade is budget relief for cap relief.
Interesting deal, have we seen something like this before?
|
Honestly, I don't believe we've ever seen a move like this before.
Correct me if I'm wrong but in previous CBA's you couldn't trade long term injured players.
I'm wondering if this clears the way for the Blue Jackets to buy him out in the off season, which makes all kinds of sense. They would save money by being able to pay out over a longer term, and get a reduced cap hit.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:08 AM
|
#167
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I know it frees cap space, but since the Leafs do still have to actually pay the salary (it's uninsured) basically they are preferring to pay a guy to do nothing than to pay Clarkson to play.
Media is speculating as to whether this and the other recent moves are Nonis' or if he is just signing papers for Shanahan's moves.
|
Yeah but the Leafs get his cap relief, which makes sense.
Its just weird that the BJ's didn't push for some kind of salary relief for doing the Leafs a pretty massive solid.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:10 AM
|
#168
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Honestly, I don't believe we've ever seen a move like this before.
Correct me if I'm wrong but in previous CBA's you couldn't trade long term injured players.
I'm wondering if this clears the way for the Blue Jackets to buy him out in the off season, which makes all kinds of sense. They would save money by being able to pay out over a longer term, and get a reduced cap hit.
|
That is always a possibility, but it sounds to me like they think he can be a better player. Overpaid for sure, but they could get something out of him. I don't think he is a Heatly or Seto just yet.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:28 AM
|
#169
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Yeah but the Leafs get his cap relief, which makes sense.
Its just weird that the BJ's didn't push for some kind of salary relief for doing the Leafs a pretty massive solid.
|
Oh, I know it makes sense from a cap relief point of view. But that just means the Leafs are going to sign another player, pay him the bucks Clarkson was getting, and still pay Horton not to play.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:29 AM
|
#170
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Yeah but the Leafs get his cap relief, which makes sense.
Its just weird that the BJ's didn't push for some kind of salary relief for doing the Leafs a pretty massive solid.
|
They did - they got 2 free roster players for what they were paying Horton anyway
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:35 AM
|
#171
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Yeah but the Leafs get his cap relief, which makes sense.
Its just weird that the BJ's didn't push for some kind of salary relief for doing the Leafs a pretty massive solid.
|
The Blue Jackets hadn't insured Horton's contract and just couldn't stomach paying a non-roster player $6 million a year. For the Leafs freeing up cap space was more important than the monetary drag.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:41 AM
|
#172
|
Voted for Kodos
|
Assuming this is the last transaction ever involving Horton, By the end of the contract, Horton will have been a Maple Leaf longer then any other team.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:48 AM
|
#173
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
|
Man how or why did the Blue Jackets agree to this
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:51 AM
|
#174
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
read the thread, the Jackets didn't have insurance on Horton so they were going to have to pay him his full salary to stay home. This way they pay someone to actually play and hopefully be the guy he was before going to the leafs. The leafs just bought more cap space.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 09:54 AM
|
#175
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
They did - they got 2 free roster players for what they were paying Horton anyway
|
I think there's a bit of a misconception here. Horton's cap hit is 5.3 and Clarkson's is 5.25. Both have roughly 28M left on their deal for a little bit over 5 years. The contracts are near negligible. I think there's a couple assuming Horton has a higher contract.
Of note, Horton's contract can't be bought out because of LTIR but Clarkson's contract is structured in such a way that a buyout may be near pointless. His base salary is actually only a million a year, however, he receives a large signing bonuses each year. Depending on the exact wording of the contract, only the salary portion could be bought out and he would still be guaranteed his signing bonuses.
But really worst case scenario, assuming Horton is done, is Columbus is still better off. Even if they do buyout Clarkson this summer and up paying him whatever 20M+, it's still a slightly better scenario than paying Horton. If Clarkson is able to bounce back at all, it becomes a very solid move.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 10:02 AM
|
#176
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
I think there's a bit of a misconception here. Horton's cap hit is 5.3 and Clarkson's is 5.25. Both have roughly 28M left on their deal for a little bit over 5 years. The contracts are near negligible. I think there's a couple assuming Horton has a higher contract.
Of note, Horton's contract can't be bought out because of LTIR but Clarkson's contract is structured in such a way that a buyout may be near pointless. His base salary is actually only a million a year, however, he receives a large signing bonuses each year. Depending on the exact wording of the contract, only the salary portion could be bought out and he would still be guaranteed his signing bonuses.
But really worst case scenario, assuming Horton is done, is Columbus is still better off. Even if they do buyout Clarkson this summer and up paying him whatever 20M+, it's still a slightly better scenario than paying Horton. If Clarkson is able to bounce back at all, it becomes a very solid move.
|
Horton's salary is $6M. Columbus doesn't spend to the cap and the cap isn't their issue. $$$ are their issue.
For $6M, they can pay Clarkson and another player. That's 2 bodies on a 23 man roster.
Fans are entirely focused on cap hits now instead of money, which is fine in Canadian markets where teams will spend whatever it takes.
But in many markets where they are on a budget, it is money, not cap hit, that matters.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 10:39 AM
|
#177
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Horton's salary is $6M. Columbus doesn't spend to the cap and the cap isn't their issue. $$$ are their issue.
For $6M, they can pay Clarkson and another player. That's 2 bodies on a 23 man roster.
Fans are entirely focused on cap hits now instead of money, which is fine in Canadian markets where teams will spend whatever it takes.
But in many markets where they are on a budget, it is money, not cap hit, that matters.
|
I was talking about salary, it's still negligible.
Horton's contract this year and the next 3 years is 6M, then it's 4.5M and 3.6M in the final year. So after this season he is owed 26.1M.
Clarkson's contract this year is 4.75M, then it's 5.5M, then it's 7M for 2 years, 4.75M and finally 3.25M. So after this season he is owed 27.5M.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 10:43 AM
|
#178
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I hear Toronto is trotting out the old we can now take on bad contracts for team's 1st round picks mantra.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 10:48 AM
|
#179
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
I was talking about salary, it's still negligible.
Horton's contract this year and the next 3 years is 6M, then it's 4.5M and 3.6M in the final year. So after this season he is owed 26.1M.
Clarkson's contract this year is 4.75M, then it's 5.5M, then it's 7M for 2 years, 4.75M and finally 3.25M. So after this season he is owed 27.5M.
|
But Clarkson actually plays. So they don't have to also pay someone else.
|
|
|
02-27-2015, 10:50 AM
|
#180
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
But Clarkson actually plays. So they don't have to also pay someone else.
|
I've said as much and I've said it makes sense for Columbus. I was just addressing the misconception that Horton has a higher contract, they have the same so they don't get 2 free roster players. Just the one.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 AM.
|
|