Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-20-2015, 08:23 AM   #781
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
These same "fans" are going to be trashing Giordano, Monahan, Gaudreau, etc., and trying to run them out of town soon enough as well.
Running out of town? Nothing anyone posts on this forum has any effect whatsoever on roster decisions and player movement. Short of throwing cups of beer at the guy or jeering his family at the mall, fans can't run a player out of town.

I know part of being a fan is feeling connected to the team. But I also hope most fans recognize that's just a feeling they give themselves, and not an actual thing. These guys are professional athletes. Nothing we say or feel has any tangible effect on their game or on their careers.

If the time comes when it's smart for the franchise to move Gio or Monahan I'll cheerfully support such a move. I must have seen over 300 players wear the Flames jersey by now. Players come and go. What matters is the jersey and winning.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 02-20-2015, 08:29 AM   #782
remember2004
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Running out of town? Nothing anyone posts on this forum has any effect whatsoever on roster decisions and player movement. Short of throwing cups of beer at the guy or jeering his family at the mall, fans can't run a player out of town.

I know part of being a fan is feeling connected to the team. But I also hope most fans recognize that's just a feeling they give themselves, and not an actual thing. These guys are professional athletes. Nothing we say or feel has any tangible effect on their game or on their careers.

If the time comes when it's smart for the franchise to move Gio or Monahan I'll cheerfully support such a move. I must have seen over 300 players wear the Flames jersey by now. Players come and go. What matters is the jersey and winning.
Exactly, either way like you said they're professionals they wouldn't give a rats ass if fans didn't like them their making millions while were here paying to watch them make millions. Well I wouldn't say not care completely, but they wouldn't let it affect their decision to play/make money. Moving Glenny would just be smart asset management instead of losing him for nothing in the summer.
remember2004 is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 08:29 AM   #783
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I wonder with LA's resurgence would Glencross waive for them?

Glencross, Engellend for Richards (retain $1M) and LA's 1st?
Ok so the first is for taking Richards, and Engelland we're throwing in to get rid of some salary.

What are we getting for Glencross? You forgot to include the Glencross return.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to saillias For This Useful Post:
Old 02-20-2015, 08:32 AM   #784
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

There are a few questions raised regarding Glencross asking to be traded. Why would he ask? If the guy likes playing in Alberta and the Flames are as promising as they've been since he's arrived, why would he ask to move?

If he did actually ask to be traded, the only decent reason I can think of is that the Flames won't give him the contract he wants and he'd like to try out another team before signing with them in the off-season.

But if this 10+ teams being interested jargon is real, that's exciting. The Flames could realistically get a B level Defense prospect + 2nd round pick for Glencross.
Bandwagon In Flames is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 08:36 AM   #785
remember2004
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames View Post
There are a few questions raised regarding Glencross asking to be traded. Why would he ask? If the guy likes playing in Alberta and the Flames are as promising as they've been since he's arrived, why would he ask to move?

If he did actually ask to be traded, the only decent reason I can think of is that the Flames won't give him the contract he wants and he'd like to try out another team before signing with them in the off-season.

But if this 10+ teams being interested jargon is real, that's exciting. The Flames could realistically get a B level Defense prospect + 2nd round pick for Glencross.
From what I know Curtis didn't ask for a trade but tiwas Treliving who went up to him. I don't blame Glenny either, he wants to win a cup and wants to get paid and he's not getting either with Calgary. He already took a hometown discount the first time and he's not going to do it again.
remember2004 is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 08:42 AM   #786
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by remember2004 View Post
From what I know Curtis didn't ask for a trade but tiwas Treliving who went up to him. I don't blame Glenny either, he wants to win a cup and wants to get paid and he's not getting either with Calgary. He already took a hometown discount the first time and he's not going to do it again.
I suppose Curtis took less money, a home tome discount of sorts but lost in all this (I think) is that the only reason Glencross got the currently pesky No-Movement Clause is because he took less. It's a trade off.

Also, this thread is getting unbearable. When you have one poster, the king of ending posts suggesting anyone is a moron or has issues if they disagree with him, getting upset at someone else for doing it, you know you've jumped the proverbial shark.
MrMastodonFarm is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 02-20-2015, 08:43 AM   #787
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Friedman also said Chicago is interesed about Glencross and he would waive for the Blackhawks;

http://www.nicholsonhockey.com/worth...lencross-trade
Chicago seems set on adding a bottom pairing dman with their limited cap space. Sportak also lists them as a long shot. Glencross might want to go there but is there room?

http://m.calgarysun.com/2015/02/20/c...he-stanley-cup

Last edited by The Original FFIV; 02-20-2015 at 08:49 AM.
The Original FFIV is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 08:44 AM   #788
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Chicago seems set on adding a bottom pairing dman with their limited cap space. Sportak also lists them as a long shot. Glencross might want to go there but is there room?
They'd have to send back a lot of salary to make room. Kane or Toews?
Street Pharmacist is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 08:48 AM   #789
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
I suppose Curtis took less money, a home tome discount of sorts but lost in all this (I think) is that the only reason Glencross got the currently pesky No-Movement Clause is because he took less. It's a trade off.

Also, this thread is getting unbearable. When you have one poster, the king of ending posts suggesting anyone is a moron or has issues if they disagree with him, getting upset at someone else for doing it, you know you've jumped the proverbial shark.

Hmm.. Strong disagree with the trade off part. For the last 4 years Glencross has been regarded with having a top 3 best value contract in the league. Lots of players get a NTC or NMC. They don't usually take a 50% pay cut for it though..

For the amount of GM's that are potentially interested in Glencross, there are exponentially more fans of other teams that have wanted him for years.

P.S - Strongly agree with the second part..
Bandwagon In Flames is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 08:50 AM   #790
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Burke indicated on Jack FM this morning that the Flames went to Glencross' agent to talk extension, and the numbers did not work for the Flames. He indicated that those numbers might work for another team in the summer, but not for the Flames. The conversation did not go any further throughout the season. As a result, Treliving asked for a list for trade potential, and it sounds like Glencross complied, starting with a list of one and since expanding.
I think everyone is treating the situation very professionally. Too bad it made it in the media, but Glencross was just answering a direct question, so I don't killl him for that.
Should be win-win, if the Flames can extract some value, and Glencross gets a legitimate shot at the cup.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 08:51 AM   #791
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Running out of town? Nothing anyone posts on this forum has any effect whatsoever on roster decisions and player movement. Short of throwing cups of beer at the guy or jeering his family at the mall, fans can't run a player out of town.

I know part of being a fan is feeling connected to the team. But I also hope most fans recognize that's just a feeling they give themselves, and not an actual thing. These guys are professional athletes. Nothing we say or feel has any tangible effect on their game or on their careers.

If the time comes when it's smart for the franchise to move Gio or Monahan I'll cheerfully support such a move. I must have seen over 300 players wear the Flames jersey by now. Players come and go. What matters is the jersey and winning.
Maybe we can't run players out of town, but I can clearly impact the score of the game by watching or not watching. They'll go long stretches not scoring with me watching, and so I decide to turn the TV off because obviously I'm shooting bad luck through the TV to the team. When they then score, this is not coincidence.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 02-20-2015, 08:51 AM   #792
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
They'd have to send back a lot of salary to make room. Kane or Toews?
Tongue in cheek I know but that's the rub. Teams that want to add glencross don't have room and don't want to subtract in order to make the deal happen. Nothing toxic from Chicago that we could take back, agree with Sportak that Chicago is unlikely.
The Original FFIV is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to The Original FFIV For This Useful Post:
Old 02-20-2015, 08:54 AM   #793
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames View Post
Hmm.. Strong disagree with the trade off part. For the last 4 years Glencross has been regarded with having a top 3 best value contract in the league. Lots of players get a NTC or NMC. They don't usually take a 50% pay cut for it though..
Not sure what the percentage is but non-stars like Glencross get those because they take less. Was it 50%, probably not but I'm sure it was a decent amount.

Top players get No Trade/No Move because they're top players, others get it when they give it something else.
MrMastodonFarm is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 09:00 AM   #794
nemanja2306
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Exp:
Default

It's also worth noting that he expanded his list after Treliving asked. He could have just as easily insisted on being traded to the Ducks, and where would that leave us as far our position in the trade negotiations? He seems like a stand up dude.

He handled this NTC thing much better than someone else.
nemanja2306 is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 09:12 AM   #795
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Hawks are in cap jail so hopefully the flames can get some value if they take back a big contract.

Hawks likely need to move Sharp or Bickell this offseason
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 09:13 AM   #796
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug View Post
Burke indicated on Jack FM this morning that the Flames went to Glencross' agent to talk extension, and the numbers did not work for the Flames. He indicated that those numbers might work for another team in the summer, but not for the Flames. The conversation did not go any further throughout the season. As a result, Treliving asked for a list for trade potential, and it sounds like Glencross complied, starting with a list of one and since expanding.
I think everyone is treating the situation very professionally. Too bad it made it in the media, but Glencross was just answering a direct question, so I don't killl him for that.
Should be win-win, if the Flames can extract some value, and Glencross gets a legitimate shot at the cup.
Great post. Just shows how much the media can get under the players' skin. It's been getting out of hand in other sports lately too.
ForeverFlameFan is online now  
Old 02-20-2015, 09:15 AM   #797
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nemanja2306 View Post
It's also worth noting that he expanded his list after Treliving asked. He could have just as easily insisted on being traded to the Ducks, and where would that leave us as far our position in the trade negotiations? He seems like a stand up dude.

He handled this NTC thing much better than someone else.
With the team in a playoff race holding on to Glencross wouldn't be the worst thing so no way they are forced to move him to the Ducks. Since Glennie wants to get paid he needed to expand that list. He is an effective 3rd liner that can move up in the lineup so if the Ducks dangle a 3rd the Flames can easily hold onto Glencross because he will help this season
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 09:26 AM   #798
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I agree with those that are saying Glencross seems to be getting too much flack from some fans. I think he deserves more respect.

It's true that he seems to have some effort issues at times, but I think he plays banged up a lot as well.

Whatever happens, I wish him all the best.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 09:30 AM   #799
Burke Salad
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Anyone know if Montreal is on his list, seems like he would be a good fit there?
Burke Salad is offline  
Old 02-20-2015, 09:31 AM   #800
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

So far the only reported teams on his list are Anaheim and Chicago.

Friedman has his doubts as to whether the Penguins are on the list.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy