| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:41 PM | #701 |  
	| Resident Videologist 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by CaptainYooh  ... and then there's Engelland...  Still can't believe so many people here were excited about his signing. |  
I don't recall anybody being excited about the signing. In fact, I'd say the VAST majority were appalled at the price and had him pegged as the 5th defenceman at best but probably the 6th.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post: |  
BigFlameDog,
 
bubbsy ,
 
Caged Great ,
 
CalgaryFan1988 ,
 
cam_wmh ,
 
Diemenz ,
 
Flambé ,
 
Goodlad ,
 
GreenHardHat ,
 
MolsonInBothHands ,
 
stone hands ,
 
sureLoss ,
 
zztim81 |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:44 PM | #702 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by AC  I don't recall anybody being excited about the signing. ... |  
You'd be surprised   
				__________________"An idea is always a  generalization, and generalization is a property of  thinking. To  generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
 “To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:49 PM | #703 |  
	| Some kinda newsbreaker! 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by CaptainYooh   |  
Yeah read past the point where the full contract details were known and insert the Will Ferrell-Anchorman meme.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:51 PM | #704 |  
	| Resident Videologist 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by CaptainYooh   |  
After the pricetag was announced I don't see anybody being excited about it other than the odd poster mentioning it'll be nice to have a veteran capable of protecting our rookies.
 
Again, the VAST majority seem to be pissed off about it.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:52 PM | #705 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by sureLoss  Yeah read past the point where the full contract details were known and insert the Will Ferrell-Anchorman meme. |  
I know.  Most people were turned off by the price.  But that was to suggest that he was OK at some other price, which he wasn't and isn't.  He is much worse than Butler, as it turned out.  Anyway, that was just an off-topic comment.
		 
				__________________"An idea is always a  generalization, and generalization is a property of  thinking. To  generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
 “To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:54 PM | #706 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Nachodamus.      | 
 
			
			An interesting tidbit I just happened across... 
	Quote: 
	
		| Sportsnet @Sportsnet  6m6 minutes ago Dennis Seidenberg is reportedly willing to waive his no trade clause if a deal comes along. http://bit.ly/1vkxkoh
 |  
I imagine the Flames would have to +++ but Yes Please. (Total 100% speculation on my part.)
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny'sDaMan For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:56 PM | #707 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Austria, NOT Australia      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Lanny'sDaMan  An interesting tidbit I just happened across... 
Sportsnet @Sportsnet  6m6 minutes ago 
Dennis Seidenberg is reportedly willing to waive his no trade clause if a deal comes along. http://bit.ly/1vkxkoh 
I imagine the Flames would have to +++ but Yes Please. (Total 100% speculation on my part.) |  
don't they need a defender themselves? Miller is on IR again, which is a nightmare for them.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:56 PM | #708 |  
	| 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			I'm happy that I am probably going to his last home game because I'm happy for what he's done but I want a new chapter with younger guys, if he's leaving, thank you Curtis!
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to savardandjokinen For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 05:58 PM | #709 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Nachodamus.      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by devo22  don't they need a defender themselves? Miller is on IR again, which is a nightmare for them. |  
Just passing along what I saw on twitter, and then  extrapolated a correlation out of unicorn piss and kitten dreams.   
				 Last edited by Lanny'sDaMan; 02-19-2015 at 06:15 PM.
					
					
						Reason: Grammar. Use it.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 06:08 PM | #710 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Stampede Corral      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Resolute 14  Or that if the Flames are asking him for a list teams he would go to, then make a move rather than pulling a Cammalleri. |  
Pulling a squid.  
That works, somehow.   |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 06:23 PM | #711 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: CGY      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Lanny'sDaMan  An interesting tidbit I just happened across...
 
 
 I imagine the Flames would have to +++ but Yes Please. (Total 100% speculation on my part.)
 |  
No to any plus. Don't think the flames should be in the market for a guy who would be their oldest defender and oldest player
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 06:25 PM | #712 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: CGY      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by savemedrzaius  Had to look up Glencross online...had never heard of him. What exactly makes him any better than a Mike Santorelli? Doesn't seem special to me and how does he have a NTC? |  
How do you have an accou there for 3 years and not know who Glencross is?
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 06:26 PM | #713 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: NYYC      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Badgers Nose  I can still see a scenario where he doesn't get traded, ala Cammi last year.
 Hopefully that situation last year set the table for some reasonable offers from teams that could use the help.
 |  
Let's face it, that whole reasoning was just Burke lawyering his way out of a bad situation with some clever post-rationalization. Everyone was waiting for Kessler to be traded to get things moving that day, and Burke ran out of time because he waited too long. He wasn't some grand protector of Flames virtue...he was simply a guy who gambled and lost. It happens sometimes, but I'd appreciate if they just owned up to it. He hit a home run with Bera, and totally blew it with Cammalleri. 
 
There's nothing that says that because you traded a guy for a certain price in one situation, you absolutely must adhere to the same standards the next time. If you don't like what a team offers you, all you have to do is say no and move on.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 06:33 PM | #714 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: CGY      | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Table 5  Let's face it, that whole reasoning was just Burke lawyering his way out of a bad situation with some clever post-rationalization. Everyone was waiting for Kessler to be traded to get things moving that day, and Burke ran out of time because he waited too long. He wasn't some grand protector of Flames virtue...he was simply a guy who gambled and lost. It happens sometimes, but I'd appreciate if they just owned up to it. He hit a home run with Bera, and totally blew it with Cammalleri. 
 There's nothing that says that because you traded a guy for a certain price in one situation, you absolutely must adhere to the same standards the next time. If you don't like what a team offers you, all you have to do is say no and move on.
 |  
Burke admitted that he lowered the price on Cammy but there wasn't enough time. 
 
People forget that the flames really wanted to retain Cammy last year. Burkes gamble was he thought he could sign Cammy and opted not to take the 4th round pick that so many posters get bent out of shape that he didn't take.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 06:42 PM | #715 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Austria, NOT Australia      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Vinny01  Burke admitted that he lowered the price on Cammy but there wasn't enough time. 
 People forget that the flames really wanted to retain Cammy last year. Burkes gamble was he thought he could sign Cammy and opted not to take the 4th round pick that so many posters get bent out of shape that he didn't take.
 |  
Burke got a 3rd for Stempniak. I doubt teams would be prepared to give up more for Stempniak than for Cammy.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 06:52 PM | #716 |  
	| Some kinda newsbreaker! 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style      | 
 
			
			So with the report that the Ducks were originally the only team that was on the list, what happened there?  Ducks not interested in Glencross or were they low balling the Flames?
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 06:54 PM | #717 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by sureLoss  So with the report that the Ducks were originally the only team that was on the list, what happened there?  Ducks not interested in Glencross or were they low balling the Flames? |  
Flames may be hesitant to pull the trigger on a trade to a division rival? Might have been a pick coming back? Double negative as the Flames would upgrade ANA while the Flames stay the same? 
 
Maybe Treliving has been seeking more of a hockey deal with other parts and no one is chomping at that bit like he said today.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 07:22 PM | #718 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: The Void between Darkness and Light      | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by sureLoss  So with the report that the Ducks were originally the only team that was on the list, what happened there?  Ducks not interested in Glencross or were they low balling the Flames? |  
Combination of Ducks giving an early low offer and Calgary being less than inclined towards giving him to a team they may face in the 1st round (and I think play again down the stretch) for less than a their asking price.
 
Now that Friedman is reporting Glencross is open to destinations besides Anaheim, you have to think that behoves Anaheim to increase their offer.
 
Another thing probably holding things up is that Anaheim is looking to unload a couple of players as well. Calgary probably isn't interested in a UFA for UFA deal and is probably looking at one of their close prospects.
 
Anaheim may have to do a deal first before they can accommodate Glencross. Bob Murray has mentioned Glencross before with admiration, so I think there is probably some serious desire from their side. I think Anaheim is where he eventually ends up.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 07:24 PM | #719 |  
	| Some kinda newsbreaker! 
				 
				Join Date: May 2004 Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by dammage79  Flames may be hesitant to pull the trigger on a trade to a division rival? Might have been a pick coming back? Double negative as the Flames would upgrade ANA while the Flames stay the same? 
 Maybe Treliving has been seeking more of a hockey deal with other parts and no one is chomping at that bit like he said today.
 |  
Perhaps, but none of that is really Glencross' concern from his perspective.  He was at one point set on only going to the Ducks.
 
IMO only reason to expand his list is that a) Anaheim doesn't really want him b) Flames asked him to so they could try and create a bidding war in an attempt to increase Anaheim's offer
 
I suppose you could make a case that Treliving told him to expand his list or he would finish the season as a Flame, but who would want a malcontent on the team.
		 
				 Last edited by sureLoss; 02-19-2015 at 07:26 PM.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-19-2015, 07:26 PM | #720 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: The Bay Area      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by savemedrzaius  Had to look up Glencross online...had never heard of him. What exactly makes him any better than a Mike Santorelli? Doesn't seem special to me and how does he have a NTC? |  
What a poor, pathetic, trolling attempt.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to the2bears For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 PM. | 
 
 
 |