Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Tech Talk
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-11-2015, 07:14 PM   #1
Travis Munroe
RealtorŪ
 
Travis Munroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default low res image to high res?

I received some low resolution images from an architect for a property I am selling. I need to blow this up to 4'x4' on a vinyl banner to hang on the fence as the property is under construction.
The architect is confusing me beyond belief saying that he needs to re do everything and run a machine overnight to get a high resolution image.

Surely there is an easier way ????

Thanks in advance!
__________________

OFFICIAL CP REALTOR & PROPERTY MANAGER
Travis Munroe | Century 21 Elevate | 403.971.4300

Residential Buying & Selling
info@tmunroe.com
www.tmunroe.com

Property Management
travis@mpmCalgary.com
www.mpmCalgary.com
Travis Munroe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 08:08 PM   #2
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Spoiler!


Joking aside, it might take some time to recompress to a higher resolution depending on the size of the job, size of the poster and the compression format used.
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FlameOn For This Useful Post:
Old 02-11-2015, 08:28 PM   #3
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Sure, you could just upscale the file. It'll look awful.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 09:13 PM   #4
Regular_John
First Line Centre
 
Regular_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Realtor 1 View Post
I received some low resolution images from an architect for a property I am selling. I need to blow this up to 4'x4' on a vinyl banner to hang on the fence as the property is under construction.
The architect is confusing me beyond belief saying that he needs to re do everything and run a machine overnight to get a high resolution image.

Surely there is an easier way ????

Thanks in advance!
Generally upscaling images is a bad idea, they just don't scale up that well. But it varies by application. For instance most billboards that are being viewed at a distance are actually produced at pretty low resolution. So if your 4' x 4' banner is far enough way from the viewer, you might just be able to upscale the image in photoshop.

As for your architect, yeah he probably has to run his machine overnight to render out the image from his 3D modelling software. 3D rendering is pretty CPU intensive, it's why places like Pixar will have rooms & rooms of "rendering farms" which are just computers running the 3D renders.

Typically we get an low res preview from architectural rendering companies which is used for proofing, and once the final design is approved the full res render will come a week or two later.
Regular_John is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Regular_John For This Useful Post:
Old 02-11-2015, 09:16 PM   #5
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Since you say it's for a place under construction, I'm assuming they're renders and not photos?

In which case what he's saying makes sense; when you render an image from a building that exist in the computer, that can take a long time and scales significantly with the size of the image. Doubling the resolution quadruples the number of pixels so would quadruple the render time (roughly anyway, I'm sure there's optimizations and stuff that impacts this).

For a 4'x4' banner you probably want 100dpi or 150dpi or so, lets go with 100. 48" x 48" at 100dpi is an image of 4800 x 4800. 7200 x 7200 for 150dpi.

If the image he gave you was say 1000 x 1000, and the new ones are 4800 x 4800 or 7200 x 7200 then it could take either 23 times longer or 52 times longer to render those compared to the 1000 x 1000.

The one thing you could find out is what DPI he's rendering to. If you told him it was for print he may be rendering at 300dpi or 600dpi or even more. For a 4'x4' banner you probably don't need that high a dpi because it'll probably be viewed from quite a distance. You only need 300dpi if you are looking at it from six inches away.

So he may be able to do it faster if he does it for 100dpi or 150dpi (or find out what the sign maker recommends as a source image dpi).
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 02-11-2015, 09:20 PM   #6
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaydorn View Post
So if your 4' x 4' banner is far enough way from the viewer, you might just be able to upscale the image in photoshop.
Maybe, depending on the kind of image it is too. If it were me though I'd go with the re-render to be safe, nothing screams bush league like a low resolution image. At least to me anyway.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 02-11-2015, 09:38 PM   #7
Travis Munroe
RealtorŪ
 
Travis Munroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Thank you for clarifying - I believe he is pushing them to 300 dpi
__________________

OFFICIAL CP REALTOR & PROPERTY MANAGER
Travis Munroe | Century 21 Elevate | 403.971.4300

Residential Buying & Selling
info@tmunroe.com
www.tmunroe.com

Property Management
travis@mpmCalgary.com
www.mpmCalgary.com
Travis Munroe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2015, 12:59 AM   #8
To Be Quite Honest
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

When desperate I have used a pixel design to mask a picture. Not sure that it would work in this example however.
To Be Quite Honest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2015, 07:34 AM   #9
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

I'm assuming he's either doing the project on Revit, which has a built in rendering feature, or doing a separate rendering on Rhino.
I know from experience that running a full, presentation quality (300dpi from what I remember...don't feel like opening Revit to check) rendering of an entire building (you can adjust the rendering window size), can take 5-6 hours.
I haven't used Rhino to produce any renderings, but I would assume it would take about the same time.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.

Last edited by Mass_nerder; 02-17-2015 at 10:59 AM.
Mass_nerder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2015, 08:47 PM   #10
normtwofinger
Self-Retirement
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Exp:
Default

300 ppi is overkill for a 4'x4'.
normtwofinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy