Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2014, 02:43 PM   #1
megatron
First Line Centre
 
megatron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Exp:
Default HockeyFuture ranks Calgary prospect pool #2

I'm not sure if this has been posted somewhere else -- if so, please delete this thread.

Hockeyfuture has updated their prospect rankings with the Flames up to #2 (from #6).

Top 5:
1) Buffalo
2) Calgary
3) NYI
4) Detroit
5) Anaheim

http://www.hockeysfuture.com/article...prospect-pool/

Quote:
Strengths: The Calgary Flames have undergone an incredible amount of organizational turnover the past couple of seasons, but a promising vision for the future appears to be finally taking shape. They currently have a young, talented NHL roster, headlined by prospects such as Johnny Gaudreau, Josh Jooris, Sven Baertschi, and Markus Granlund – not to mention Sam Bennett, who is currently recovering from shoulder surgery. Their AHL system is well stocked, too, with Emile Poirier, Bill Arnold, Michael Ferland, and others pushing for NHL jobs. There are even more talented forwards at the NCAA and CHL levels, with Mark Jankowski, Morgan Klimchuk, and Hunter Smith all showing various degrees of promise. The Flames also have a few promising defensemen, such as Tyler Wotherspoon, who are close to NHL-ready. The goaltending pool is not particularly deep, but the prospects that are there – Mason McDonald, Jon Gillies, and Joni Ortio – have good potential.

Weaknesses: The Flames have great depth on defense, but the system lacks a high-end, puck-moving defenseman who can transition the puck up ice and run the power play. As mentioned earlier, the Flames have several quality goaltending prospects, but the position lacks depth.

Top 5 Prospects: 1. Johnny Gaudreau, LW; 2. Sam Bennett, C; 3. Sven Baertschi, LW; 4. Max Reinhart, C; 5. Markus Granlund, C.

Key Additions: Sam Bennett (2014), Mason McDonald (2014), Hunter Smith (2014), Sena Acolatse (free agent)
The top 3 prospects mimic what CP had ranked during the summer rankings I believe.

Edmonton is #25
__________________
megatron is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to megatron For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 02:53 PM   #2
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

It was mentioned a thread in the Prospects section, but probably a little buried for most.

The only thing that really stands out in their Top 5 of our prospects is having Max Reinhart included. He's one guy who I think has regressed a bit over the last year in terms of depth. I think you could make a very strong case for guys like Poirier (who I see at #3 overall), Ferland, Wootherspoon, Gillies, Klimchuk etc being considered ahead of him on such a list.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 02:57 PM   #3
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
It was mentioned a thread in the Prospects section, but probably a little buried for most.

The only thing that really stands out in their Top 5 of our prospects is having Max Reinhart included. He's one guy who I think has regressed a bit over the last year in terms of depth. I think you could make a very strong case for guys like Poirier (who I see at #3 overall), Ferland, Wootherspoon, Gillies, Klimchuk etc being considered ahead of him on such a list.
HF has always overrated Reinhart - his prospect grade should be a full point down. The players you mentioned are certainly ahead of Reinhart .
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 03:08 PM   #4
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

The Flames have moved from 30th to 2nd in four years. Those strengths/weaknesses assessments are a lot of fun to read a few years later, knowing how things have turned out with a few of those players ...

FALL 2010 - 30th

Spoiler!

FALL 2011 - 26th

Spoiler!

FALL 2012 - 23rd

Spoiler!

FALL 2013 - 13th

Spoiler!

FALL 2014 - 2nd

Spoiler!
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 03:36 PM   #5
JonDuke
Franchise Player
 
JonDuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

LOL @ Tim Erixon #2 in 2010
JonDuke is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JonDuke For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 03:50 PM   #6
Mony
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Mony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I find it incredibly amazing how we're that high up on the list with no top 3 picks ever and our only franchise top 5 pick just this past June. It's really, really awesome.

But what might be more amazing is how Edmonton has that kind of depth after all of the high picks they've gotten. This is after anywhere from 4-8 years of rebuilding depending on who you speak to? There's no words.
__________________
NHL Flames | Golden Knights | Cal Stampeders | Panthers | Chelsea FC | AVFC | Raptors | Orlando Magic | Blue Jays | Athletics | Inferno CWHL

Last edited by Mony; 11-16-2014 at 04:01 PM.
Mony is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mony For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 05:32 PM   #7
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Buffalo at #1 (With McDavid or Eichel and two other first round picks on the way) and Calgary at #2. The future is bright!
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 05:33 PM   #8
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Don't understand the goaltending depth comment... do teams usually have more than three fairly highly regarded goalie prospects at one time?
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 05:50 PM   #9
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Hockey's Future is no good.
__________________
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 05:54 PM   #10
dirk diggler
First Line Centre
 
dirk diggler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

with the way the Islanders are playing, Buffalo might have taken the pick last year but i can understand them choosing next year based on the hope that the islanders would be a lottery team
dirk diggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 05:56 PM   #11
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk diggler View Post
with the way the Islanders are playing, Buffalo might have taken the pick last year but i can understand them choosing next year based on the hope that the islanders would be a lottery team
it was not the Sabres' choice. The Islanders could give them either the 14 or 15 pick and they decided to give them next years pick. At this point, it looks like a wise choice.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 06:01 PM   #12
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Will be fun to read the anger posts from other fan bases as they try to argue that the Flames shouldn't be ranked so highly. Seems there is always so much bickering on these lists every year. I do think Buffalo has the most prospect talent, and now it will be interesting to watch as how they develop them and start bringing them into the NHL slowly. They have quite the task ahead of them changing the culture of that team now, and turning themselves around. I would bet that they will be able to.

Cube, does it appear that Buffalo's prospects are being properly developed? From an outsider looking in, they seem to be bringing their guys up slowly now, which I think is the right way. Does Nolan seem to be the guy to keep around the youth?
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 06:04 PM   #13
Superfraggle
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Don't understand the goaltending depth comment... do teams usually have more than three fairly highly regarded goalie prospects at one time?
I'm guessing the issue is goalies who could step in this year if needed. Gillies is in college, MacDonald is in the Q, so it looks a little weak once you get past Ortio if we run into injury issues.
Superfraggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 06:07 PM   #14
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Hockey's Future is no good.
This thread was created because they accurately rated the Flames prospect pool as being one of the best in the league. Or do you just mean in general?
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 06:18 PM   #15
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
It was mentioned a thread in the Prospects section, but probably a little buried for most.

The only thing that really stands out in their Top 5 of our prospects is having Max Reinhart included. He's one guy who I think has regressed a bit over the last year in terms of depth. I think you could make a very strong case for guys like Poirier (who I see at #3 overall), Ferland, Wootherspoon, Gillies, Klimchuk etc being considered ahead of him on such a list.
And Jooris has screamed past a bunch of guys. For me, it's:

Gaudreau
Bennett
Baertschi
Poirier
Jooris
Ferland
Wotherspoon
Klimchuk
Reinhart
Arnold

as a top ten at this point in time

(even though Jooris has solidified himself as a legitimate NHLer, I still think Baertschi and Poirier have enough upside to be listed ahead of him)
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 06:26 PM   #16
Mike F
Franchise Player
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Djibouti
Exp:
Default

If I don't care about HF and write them off as amateurs when they ranked the Flames low, can I suddenly put a lot of stock in their valuation when they rank the Flames high?

(that was rhetorical)
Mike F is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Mike F For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 06:28 PM   #17
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
And Jooris has screamed past a bunch of guys. For me, it's:

Gaudreau
Bennett
Baertschi
Poirier
Jooris
Ferland
Wotherspoon
Klimchuk
Reinhart
Arnold

as a top ten at this point in time
Granlund isn't in your top 10?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 06:29 PM   #18
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
And Jooris has screamed past a bunch of guys. For me, it's:

Gaudreau
Bennett
Baertschi
Poirier
Jooris
Ferland
Wotherspoon
Klimchuk
Reinhart
Arnold

as a top ten at this point in time

(even though Jooris has solidified himself as a legitimate NHLer, I still think Baertschi and Poirier have enough upside to be listed ahead of him)
I think Van Ba Brant will see a call up later this year, as it seems like he is having a great season.

I'd also list Seiloff ahead of Arnold.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2014, 06:34 PM   #19
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Granlund isn't in your top 10?
I think its just a case of holy #### Granlund too?!?!?! So many prospects, its easy to forget a few
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Heavy Jack For This Useful Post:
Old 11-16-2014, 06:39 PM   #20
Redliner
Franchise Player
 
Redliner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Conquering the world one 7-11 at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mony View Post
But what might be more amazing is how Edmonton has that kind of depth after all of the high picks they've gotten. This is after anywhere from 4-8 years of rebuilding depending on who you speak to? There's no words.
There are two words.

NO

GOOD.
__________________
"There will be a short outage tonight sometime between 11:00PM and 1:00AM as network upgrades are performed. Please do not panic and overthrow society. Thank you."
Redliner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Redliner For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
hockeyfuture , prospects , ranking


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy