Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-10-2014, 12:17 PM   #821
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Hackey, you're correct. I get nervous when people want to package prospects and send them off for other players (or magic beans). It's too early in our prospects' careers to know who will surprise on the upside and who will fail to develop. We just need to tend our garden a bit longer and then the weeds will become obvious.
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 12:22 PM   #822
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Were just starting year 2 of the rebuild and were projected to be one of the worst teams in the league again. I don't think there is any need to worry about any specific position at this point. Were gonna be bad for at least another 2-3 seasons. Just stock up quality assets and develop correctly and we can address specific needs when it's necessary. We have no idea who or how our prospects will pan out at this point. A little more patience is all we need to worry about.
Don't tell that to the Flames coaches and players. All I can say is, nothing is guaranteed to go down the way folks are lead to think they will. The fantasizing over McDavid or Eichel is equally as based in fantasy as hoping for the playoffs. The reason its exciting to watch the Flames is their work ethic and just because thing look bad to some on paper, does not equate to the results at the end of the season being that way.

If they do, fine. If they don't even better, because that's progression and heading in the right direction.

I just want to watch the season unfold without a preconceived notion that failure is imminent, or that success is guaranteed. I'm a middle of the road guy and I like to believe Hartley and Gio when they say they believe they'll be better than what people are penciling them in as .
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2014, 12:49 PM   #823
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
When was the last time a legit top pairing defenceman actually hit free agency? And if one actually does, they're going to get paid way too much money. Filling major holes on your team through free agency is a terrible idea. You either overpay, or the players you want sign elsewhere and you end up with nothing.
Suter. Bouwmeester. Chara. Chris Pronger's rights were traded to the Flyers, but he was a UFA; he was also traded 4 times in his career. Kimmo Timmonen was also a rights acquisition by Philadelphia.

Timmonen would be the kind of move I'd expect them to make; a top pairing guy who's more of a #2 and will anchor the second pairing.

Guys move. And if we have a top 5 farm system, we should be able to put together a package for the right player when the time is right.

Obviously we keep drafting for defensive depth, and I think the next two drafts will see more of a focus on the blue line. We have the centre depth we've only dreamed about for the past 20 years, and our wings are full of excellent prospects as well.

BPA at the top of the draft, but when the dust settles I expect us to have drafted more defensemen than forwards next year.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 12:50 PM   #824
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
When was the last time a legit top pairing defenceman actually hit free agency? And if one actually does, they're going to get paid way too much money. Filling major holes on your team through free agency is a terrible idea. You either overpay, or the players you want sign elsewhere and you end up with nothing.
Suter comes to mind
Goodlad is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Goodlad For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2014, 12:52 PM   #825
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
Hackey, you're correct. I get nervous when people want to package prospects and send them off for other players (or magic beans). It's too early in our prospects' careers to know who will surprise on the upside and who will fail to develop. We just need to tend our garden a bit longer and then the weeds will become obvious.
I don't think anyone wants to ship any prospects out yet. Or if they do, they're in the minority.

However, with another two or three years of high draft picks, in addition to the prospects we've already got in the system, there is going to be MORE than enough in the cupboard to put together a deal for an impact NHL veteran D, without giving up a first round pick.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2014, 12:59 PM   #826
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodlad View Post
Suter comes to mind
Forgot about him, but still, it's not very often a player of his calibre hits UFA status.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 01:28 PM   #827
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

@hackey

People like to say the rebuild started with the iggy trade. To me it started in 2011, when our drafting approach changed and we stopped trading away high picks. And seeing as several players from that class are beggining to make an impact at the top level and look poised to become key pieces of the team moving forward it even further reinforces that point. We started accumulating quality prospects long before that trade. Thus the year 2 thing doesn't mean much to me. Well be bad this year, but will make our way up the standings very shortly after that, if even half of these kids happen to pan out. As for defense, Hanifin/kylington will shore that issue up pretty quickly, as they are supposedly on Ekblads level or better. And he's already skating in the NHL this fall.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 02:10 PM   #828
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Don't tell that to the Flames coaches and players. All I can say is, nothing is guaranteed to go down the way folks are lead to think they will. The fantasizing over McDavid or Eichel is equally as based in fantasy as hoping for the playoffs. The reason its exciting to watch the Flames is their work ethic and just because thing look bad to some on paper, does not equate to the results at the end of the season being that way.

If they do, fine. If they don't even better, because that's progression and heading in the right direction.

I just want to watch the season unfold without a preconceived notion that failure is imminent, or that success is guaranteed. I'm a middle of the road guy and I like to believe Hartley and Gio when they say they believe they'll be better than what people are penciling them in as .
Yeah - if Monahan, Brodie, Backlund, etc. continue to improve to the extent that they play a huge part in a significant improvement in the standings compared to last year, but still get a top 10 pick and a good player in the draft, that would be just as rewarding.

Last edited by mile; 09-10-2014 at 02:13 PM.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 02:18 PM   #829
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The Flames are already further ahead than anyone in the media figuered a season ago. All we saw last September was "square one", "from the ground up", "rock bottom", "very beginning of a rebuild"

The idea was they had Monahan, two other firsts that may or may not have been good picks, and that was it.

The Flames put forth a decent season, including a huge charge at the end which was timed precisely with the entry of advanced stats into the daily dialogue, and three of their players moving from filler to key components due to obvious good play, and their names being displayed on various lists for pushing the play.

So now the same media has the Flames with a bright future, a stable full of prospects, and four good components on the roster, but likely heading for a tough season and little hope to move out of the very bottom of league standings.

Are they wrong again? Maybe ...

Maybe the Flames have an injury or two, some call ups, monster leaps from Backlund and Brodie, a solid season from a goaltending tandem, and a season of almost making the playoffs.

Stranger things have happened.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2014, 02:22 PM   #830
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Bouwmeester was also a trade, not a UFA signing.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 02:23 PM   #831
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
The Flames are already further ahead than anyone in the media figuered a season ago. All we saw last September was "square one", "from the ground up", "rock bottom", "very beginning of a rebuild"

The idea was they had Monahan, two other firsts that may or may not have been good picks, and that was it.

The Flames put forth a decent season, including a huge charge at the end which was timed precisely with the entry of advanced stats into the daily dialogue, and three of their players moving from filler to key components due to obvious good play, and their names being displayed on various lists for pushing the play.

So now the same media has the Flames with a bright future, a stable full of prospects, and four good components on the roster, but likely heading for a tough season and little hope to move out of the very bottom of league standings.

Are they wrong again? Maybe ...

Maybe the Flames have an injury or two, some call ups, monster leaps from Backlund and Brodie, a solid season from a goaltending tandem, and a season of almost making the playoffs.

Stranger things have happened.

I could actually see that scenerio happening more likely than the McDavid/Eichel scenerio coming to fruition.
stemit14 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2014, 02:28 PM   #832
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

So anyway.....since it's a Sam Bennett thread.........
Quote:
Sam Bennett ‏@SBennett93
Calgary✈️. Bring on the snow ❄️⛄️
Can hardly wait to see how he does in Penticton. Not expecting him to make the big squad, but a good tournament could be the start of a big year for him.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 02:58 PM   #833
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan View Post
So anyway.....since it's a Sam Bennett thread.........


Can hardly wait to see how he does in Penticton. Not expecting him to make the big squad, but a good tournament could be the start of a big year for him.


Is there any information on his current hgt/wgt?
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 03:43 PM   #834
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Not that I know of, but I think we'll all find out in a few days after the fitness test results are leaked.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2014, 04:16 PM   #835
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Isn't Sam around 6', 180ish? That would be my guess.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 04:59 PM   #836
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

At development camp Bennett was 6'1" and apparently said his weight was at "185-ish."

If that is true, maybe we see another Monahan situation where he gets up to near 200 after a good summer.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 05:21 PM   #837
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

If they do what they did in past years, anyone who participated in the development camp won't do the fitness testing again, so we likely won't get any official updated height and weight numbers for Bennett.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2014, 05:53 PM   #838
puds
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post

Maybe the Flames have an injury or two, some call ups, monster leaps from Backlund and Brodie, a solid season from a goaltending tandem, and a season of almost making the playoffs.
Personally, I see the flames bottoming out in the standings this year and than an upward trajectory. Our conference is too competitive for us to be in the playoff mix.
puds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 05:55 PM   #839
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puds View Post
Personally, I see the flames bottoming out in the standings this year and than an upward trajectory. Our conference is too competitive for us to be in the playoff mix.
I am curious to see how the Flames play under Hartley's system again.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2014, 05:57 PM   #840
Mustache
Backup Goalie
 
Mustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Posting more Flames related Vines. #93

https://vine.co/v/OzPBmYAd2J2
Mustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Mustache For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy