09-09-2014, 11:34 AM
|
#2
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
I think Montreal might be my dark horse pick this year based on those odds.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 11:39 AM
|
#3
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Colorado is getting absolutely pounded by "under" bettors. Their total is already bet down to 95.5. The original 98.5 really stood out to me as being too high as well.
Dallas is up to 91.5
NYI up to 83.5
__________________
"I think the eye test is still good, but analytics can sure give you confirmation: what you see...is that what you really believe?"
Scotty Bowman, 0 NHL games played
Last edited by united; 09-09-2014 at 12:42 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 11:41 AM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Colorado had 112 points last year…how soon people forget. I wouldn't predict a 14 point drop when the team is so young and likely to improve.
Oh, and a 13 point increase for Edmonton…we shall see…we shall see…I wouldn't bet on it though.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 11:44 AM
|
#6
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Flames Fan
Colorado had 112 points last year…how soon people forget. I wouldn't predict a 14 point drop when the team is so young and likely to improve.
Oh, and a 13 point increase for Edmonton…we shall see…we shall see…I wouldn't bet on it though.
|
for the Avs, they are basically the Leafs of this year for stats people, because their possession numbers were so low (bottom 5) people are expecting a huge regression
the same thing happened when Toronto's number was released last year, I think it ended up going from 98 to 90 or something eventually, couldn't get people to stop betting the under
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 11:53 AM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf
for the Avs, they are basically the Leafs of this year for stats people, because their possession numbers were so low (bottom 5) people are expecting a huge regression
the same thing happened when Toronto's number was released last year, I think it ended up going from 98 to 90 or something eventually, couldn't get people to stop betting the under
|
Fair enough, but even a 10 point drop is significant, and people are betting well under that. Seems unlikely they will fall that far unless Varlamov has a meltdown.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 11:55 AM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
There's no way the Arizona Cardinals will get 80 points. They only play 16 games.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
Barnet Flame,
BeltlineFan,
Burner,
BurningYears,
Cali Panthers Fan,
cam_wmh,
DownhillGoat,
ForeverFlameFan,
Itse,
MrMike,
N-E-B,
Robo
|
|
09-09-2014, 12:14 PM
|
#9
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: In the now
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by united
Dallas is up to 91.5
NYI up to 83.5
|
Too bad, 89.5 would have been a great number to go over. Still would have to bet on above 91.5 with Spezza joining Benn/Seguin and a likely improved Nichushkin.
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 06:05 PM
|
#11
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I'll take those odds for the Flames. I don't see any reason to think they will be 6 points worse this season. I think they will be in the high 70's range again.
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 06:10 PM
|
#12
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Did Carey Price lose a leg in a shark attack over the summer that I missed??? Or maybe Subban held out??
The over on Montreal is a serious gift.
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 06:26 PM
|
#13
|
|
First Line Centre
|
The best bets to me look like the over on Nashville and under on Vancouver. Nashville has a much better team this year up front and not many teams have a better D and/or goalie
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 06:27 PM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Boston Bruins: 112 1/2 --- Under
Chicago Blackhawks 111 1/2 --- Over
Los Angeles Kings 106 1/2 --- Under
Anaheim Ducks 105 1/2 --- Over
Pittsburgh Penguins 105 1/2 --- Over
St. Louis Blues 105 1/2 --- Over
San Jose Sharks 102 1/2 --- Under
Colorado Avalanche 98 1/2 --- Over
Minnesota Wild 98 1/2 --- Under
New York Rangers 95 1/2 --- Over
Tampa Bay Lightning 94 1/2 --- Over
Montreal Canadiens 93 1/2 --- Over (easily)
Detroit Red Wings 91 1/2 --- Over
Columbus Blue Jackets 90 1/2 --- Over
Philadelphia Flyers 90 1/2 --- Over
Dallas Stars 89 1/2 --- Over
Toronto Maple Leafs 88 1/2 --- Under
Vancouver Canucks 88 1/2 --- Under
Washington Capitals 88 1/2 --- Over
New Jersey Devils 83 1/2 --- Over
Carolina Hurricanes 81 1/2 --- Under
New York Islanders 81 1/2 --- Over
Arizona Coyotes 80 1/2 --- Over
Edmonton Oilers 80 1/2 --- Under
Winnipeg Jets 80 1/2 --- Under
Ottawa Senators 78 1/2 --- Over
Nashville Predators 76 1/2 --- Over
Calgary Flames 71 1/2 --- Over
Florida Panthers 70 1/2 --- Over
Buffalo Sabres 65 1/2 --- Under
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 06:31 PM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
|
First time on Bodog's site. Can you not do cumulative bets?
Or can you only bet on a single team at a time?
Last edited by cam_wmh; 09-09-2014 at 06:32 PM.
Reason: Nevermind, figured it out. :)
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 08:28 PM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Agreed on Nashville - probably the easiest bet on the list. I like Dallas too. And the Islanders and Florida - all overs.
Tampa looks pretty good too.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 AM.
|
|
