08-20-2014, 03:13 PM
|
#41
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
The odds do seem to take some odd jumps. But it looks like the league has gone out of their way to make a system that could be implemented with 200 lotto balls. Maybe they are going to a live, on-air draw like we have all asked for.
I know the old system was just done with a random scenario generator on a computer, because they would have needed like 10,000 balls to make it work.
.
|
Nope only 14 balls. 4 balls taken from those 14 corresponded to 1 of 1001 combinations assigned to teams based on the probabilities.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-20-2014, 03:15 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
I don't like that idea as it seems too arbitrary. How do you decide how many times is enough? With the unpredictability of draft quality from year-to year, I think there should still be an element of chance for draft position.
|
But that's not what the draft is about. Just because one team refused to get better and kept taking 1st overalls doesn't mean that legitimately bad teams should get screwed. This changed combined with the 2016 draft moves it further away from the intent of a draft in the first place.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-20-2014, 03:25 PM
|
#43
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Nope only 14 balls. 4 balls taken from those 14 corresponded to 1 of 1001 combinations assigned to teams based on the probabilities.
|
Sounds about right... If I heard correctly isn't it something like each team get's an assigned number range the balls are then drawn out of the hopper so if the balls came out 1 2 1 7 whichever team had number 1217 in it's range was the winner?
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 04:02 PM
|
#45
|
Franchise Player
|
Flames will have a 7.5-8.5% chance of getting 1st next year.
They will still get someone good in a deep draft.
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 04:51 PM
|
#46
|
Voted for Kodos
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed
Not insignificant odds that the worst place team only drafts 4th. It will happen quite regularly.
(without actually doing the math)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
if 17th won 1st, and 18th won 2nd.
30th would have just over a 51% chance at 3rd. There is only like a 0.02% chance of that happening.
Any other scenario would give them better odds of at least a top 3 pick.
|
Let's do the math:
In the first lottery, the worst overall team has a 20% chance of being picked.
The best case scenario for the worst overall team (if they don't get picked in the first lottery), is that the second place team gets picked. This would leave the worst overall team with a 20/86.5 (23.1%) chance of being picked in the second lottery.
If they don't get picked in the second lottery, the best case scenario for them is for the third last team to be picked in the second lottery, which combined with the first lottery results, leaves the worst overall team with a 20/75 (26.7%) chance of being picked in the third lottery.
When we do all the calculations, that means that the worst overall team will pick no better than 4th (i.e. not win a lottery spot) AT LEAST 45.1% or the time.
I won't go into all of the possible compbinations, but it's safe to say that the worst overall team will only get a top three pick about 50-55% of the time.
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 04:53 PM
|
#48
|
Franchise Player
|
Format of 2015 Draft lottery pretty much remains the same except the first 4 teams with the lowest season points total will have their odds diminished a bit. Being the worst team is is still the best case scenario since there's a 6.5% gap difference to the second worst team and a one-in-five ball chance to get the top overall pick. The worse you can do as a last place finisher in 2015 is selecting second overall. There's no better way to build a team when you still have the opportunity to take advantage of any remaining chances to draft at a better position. So, basically, if the Flames can tank to the bottom this year, I'd be ecstatic widdat! I can care less about 2016 draft when the full effect of the phased in period is complete.
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 05:00 PM
|
#49
|
Voted for Kodos
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
|
I don't expect the Flames to be bottom three, so I think that it's actually a good time for the changes to come for the Flames. The chances of getting top three picks has significantly increased.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-20-2014, 05:10 PM
|
#50
|
Franchise Player
|
nm
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 05:28 PM
|
#51
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
|
Isn't he an Oilers homer?
Surprised the article isn't whining about the chances being reduced for Edmonton's shot at 1st OA.
Would actually prefer to see some lottery ball format for all teams out of the playoffs, not just the bottom 3.
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 05:35 PM
|
#52
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:  
|
Chance of each placement to get top 3 picks.
Code:
1st 2nd 3rd Top 3
1 20.00% 17.49% 15.02% 52.51%
2 13.50% 13.07% 12.48% 39.05%
3 11.50% 11.43% 11.26% 34.19%
4 9.50% 9.68% 9.82% 29.00%
5 8.50% 8.77% 9.01% 26.28%
6 7.50% 7.82% 8.15% 23.47%
7 6.50% 6.86% 7.23% 20.59%
8 6.00% 6.36% 6.76% 19.12%
9 5.00% 5.36% 5.76% 16.12%
10 3.50% 3.81% 4.17% 11.47%
11 3.00% 3.28% 3.61% 9.89%
12 2.50% 2.75% 3.04% 8.28%
13 2.00% 2.21% 2.45% 6.66%
14 1.00% 1.11% 1.25% 3.37%
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Pellanor For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-20-2014, 05:54 PM
|
#53
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Perfect for Flames.
Coming season they may need to take advantage of a near bottom experience
End of 2016, closer to a playoff spot, they still have a shot at a top three pick.
Except things never occur as I predict.
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 06:00 PM
|
#54
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
|
That article doesn't even mention Burke and that's the picture they go with?
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!
Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MissTeeks For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-20-2014, 07:02 PM
|
#55
|
Franchise Player
|
I'm just glad the old system will be used for next years draft.
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 07:10 PM
|
#56
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:  
|
Watch as the Oilers pull another 1st overall out of their butt
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 07:11 PM
|
#57
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey
I'm just glad the old system will be used for next years draft.
|
Same system, different odds.
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 07:18 PM
|
#58
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
I know this system isn't the best for us but i hope we aren't basement dwellers in 2016.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 07:28 PM
|
#59
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
At the end of the day the ultimate tank gets you 1st or 2nd and either McDavid or Eichel in the upcoming draft.
|
|
|
08-20-2014, 08:36 PM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pellanor
Chance of each placement to get top 3 picks.
Code:
1st 2nd 3rd Top 3
1 20.00% 17.49% 15.02% 52.51%
2 13.50% 13.07% 12.48% 39.05%
3 11.50% 11.43% 11.26% 34.19%
4 9.50% 9.68% 9.82% 29.00%
5 8.50% 8.77% 9.01% 26.28%
6 7.50% 7.82% 8.15% 23.47%
7 6.50% 6.86% 7.23% 20.59%
8 6.00% 6.36% 6.76% 19.12%
9 5.00% 5.36% 5.76% 16.12%
10 3.50% 3.81% 4.17% 11.47%
11 3.00% 3.28% 3.61% 9.89%
12 2.50% 2.75% 3.04% 8.28%
13 2.00% 2.21% 2.45% 6.66%
14 1.00% 1.11% 1.25% 3.37%
|
I don't believe this is correct. For one thing, the odds for the 2nd and 3rd rounds are dependent on who wins the prior rounds. So you end up with ranges of odds.
Based on my quick run through of it, the last place team would have the following odds:
1st pick: 20%
2nd pick: 23.1% (best case, if 29th place team won round 1) to 20.2% (if 17th won)
3rd pick: 26.7% - 20.6%
Edit: not entirely right either... the 2nd and 3rd rounds have to be factored down to reflect the possibility of having won the prior round(s)
Another edit: oh, I see that you took weighted averages... my apologies, your numbers appear good
Last edited by Enoch Root; 08-20-2014 at 08:59 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 AM.
|
|