Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Pick the best prospect from the following
McDonald 101 41.22%
Smith 144 58.78%
Voters: 245. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-31-2014, 12:31 PM   #41
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
JD Watt had under .5 PPG as a 20 year-old over-ager.
That's just not true.

His 20 yo year he had 37 pts in 58 games = .64 ppg

19 yo year he had 53 pts in 70 games = .76 ppg
The Fonz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 12:40 PM   #42
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
That's just not true.

His 20 yo year he had 37 pts in 58 games = .64 ppg

19 yo year he had 53 pts in 70 games = .76 ppg
Yes, sorry was just looking at Vancouver and missed the Red Der numbers.

His 18, 19 and 20 year old seasons:

18: 0.63 PPG
19: 0.76
20: 0.64

absolutely no progression

Smith had 0.63 PPG this year as an 18 year old. As I said, if he doesn't progress at all in the next two years, then he'll be on the same train as Watt.

Watt also had 3.01 penalty minutes per game for his junior career, while Smith was at 1.56 last year (and almost nothing prior).

Watt was just an enforcer. Smith isn't.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 12:48 PM   #43
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
I don't get this discounting McDonald because he's a goalie. Goalie's have already been discounted and that's why you don't see them picked in the first round anymore. In past years McDonald would probably have been a first round pick.


It took a while as most NHL GMs and management team were better players than thinkers or analysts.

Take the draft fro 10 years ago - all development should be done by now:

Draft pos _ Goalie _ NHL games

6 _ Al Montoya _ 92
14 _ Devan Dubnyk _ 173
17 _ Marek Schwarz _ 6
26 _ Cory Schneider _ 143
37 _ David Shantz _ 0
89 _ Jeff Glass _ 0
90 _ Justin Pogge _ 7
93 _ Dan LaCosta _ 4
94 _ Thomas Greiss _ 69
129 _ Jason Churchill _ 0
137 _ Magnus Akerlund _ 0
139 _ Kyle Moir _ 0
145 _ Michal Valent _ 0
181 _ Loic Lacasse _ 0
185 _ Josh Disher _ 0
186 _ Dan Turple _ 0
189 _ Julien Ellis _ 0
191 _ Karri Ramo _ 88
203 _ Gabriel Bouthillette _ 0
206 _ Anton Khudobin _ 57
213 _ Jimmy Spratt _ 0
215 _ Ian Keserich _ 0
221 _ Daniel Taylor _ 3
228 _ David Brown _ 0
230 _ Justin Mrazek _ 0
232 _ Martin Houle _ 1
234 _ Derek MacIntyre _ 0
238 _ Yutaka Fukufuji _ 4
258 _ Pekka Rinne _ 317
274 _ Bjorn Bjurling _ 0
276 _ Sylvain Michaud _ 0
288 _ Brian Mahoney-Wilson _ 0



Guys picked 191 and greater have panned out the same ( NHL games played) than the guys under 100. 494 for goalies drafted in the top 100 and 470 for the last 100.


for Defence guys picked in the first 100 picks: 5,086 NHL games
last 100 - 1557 3.2 to 1.

forwards guys in the top 100 : 10,671 bottom 100 - 1,815 5.9 to 1


Ortio and Ramo were drafted in the last 100..... Gillies #75 and Hiller never was drafted.


odds are just so very much in favour of a forward drafted in the top 100.... in this case it would be Smith

Last edited by ricardodw; 07-31-2014 at 12:52 PM.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ricardodw For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2014, 01:01 PM   #44
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
What is with the random love for HFs ranking system? It is crap...
It's about as useful as using nhl14 to rank players. I like how they have a 10 point scale with four letter grades and they only really use 6, 7 and 8 for the most part and almost always B or C for the grades. Total waste of time.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 03:41 PM   #45
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Smith, but I think both of them were picked too high and are being overrated in the prospect rankings.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2014, 05:00 PM   #46
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I went for Smith because I think if he does hit his upside, he is a tougher kind of player to find. How many guys are there who are big, physical and can score - power forwards seem to be a dying breed. I also think his downside is higher than McDonalds, as a guy like Smith who seems super motivated (from the articles/interviews I have seen) will find a way to make it, even if that is as a pure face-puncher
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 05:48 PM   #47
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

I liked the analysis and decision to use that early 2nd on the goalie in order to get the one they wanted. But i still don't know jack about MM. His numbers suck, so i can't go off that. Someone said they saw him a lot and liked him.

How on earth can we rank him as a prospect? Total unknown. How do you measure a guy like him?
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2014, 05:48 PM   #48
jaymac106
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlottetown, PEI
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
It took a while as most NHL GMs and management team were better players than thinkers or analysts.

Take the draft fro 10 years ago - all development should be done by now:

Draft pos _ Goalie _ NHL games

6 _ Al Montoya _ 92
14 _ Devan Dubnyk _ 173
17 _ Marek Schwarz _ 6
26 _ Cory Schneider _ 143
37 _ David Shantz _ 0
89 _ Jeff Glass _ 0
90 _ Justin Pogge _ 7
93 _ Dan LaCosta _ 4
94 _ Thomas Greiss _ 69
129 _ Jason Churchill _ 0
137 _ Magnus Akerlund _ 0
139 _ Kyle Moir _ 0
145 _ Michal Valent _ 0
181 _ Loic Lacasse _ 0
185 _ Josh Disher _ 0
186 _ Dan Turple _ 0
189 _ Julien Ellis _ 0
191 _ Karri Ramo _ 88
203 _ Gabriel Bouthillette _ 0
206 _ Anton Khudobin _ 57
213 _ Jimmy Spratt _ 0
215 _ Ian Keserich _ 0
221 _ Daniel Taylor _ 3
228 _ David Brown _ 0
230 _ Justin Mrazek _ 0
232 _ Martin Houle _ 1
234 _ Derek MacIntyre _ 0
238 _ Yutaka Fukufuji _ 4
258 _ Pekka Rinne _ 317
274 _ Bjorn Bjurling _ 0
276 _ Sylvain Michaud _ 0
288 _ Brian Mahoney-Wilson _ 0



Guys picked 191 and greater have panned out the same ( NHL games played) than the guys under 100. 494 for goalies drafted in the top 100 and 470 for the last 100.


for Defence guys picked in the first 100 picks: 5,086 NHL games
last 100 - 1557 3.2 to 1.

forwards guys in the top 100 : 10,671 bottom 100 - 1,815 5.9 to 1


Ortio and Ramo were drafted in the last 100..... Gillies #75 and Hiller never was drafted.


odds are just so very much in favour of a forward drafted in the top 100.... in this case it would be Smith
The next year (2005) the opposite is true with Price, Quick, Pavelec and Bishop being drafted in the first 2 rounds. Do not have time to go through every draft year but it is interesting nonetheless!
jaymac106 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jaymac106 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2014, 06:01 PM   #49
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon View Post
I liked the analysis and decision to use that early 2nd on the goalie in order to get the one they wanted. But i still don't know jack about MM. His numbers suck, so i can't go off that. Someone said they saw him a lot and liked him.

How on earth can we rank him as a prospect? Total unknown. How do you measure a guy like him?
How about here.

Quote:
Despite the fact that McDonald might have had a subpar showing on the international stage in the WHC-17, the netminder rebounded for Team Canada at the WJC-18 as he played in six games for Team Canada and recorded a 1.94 GAA and .930 Save Percentage. As a result of his performances in Finland, McDonald was named the top goaltender in the world for his age group – an accolade that is not just hard to achieve, but one that must be worked for with the utmost dedication to one’s craft.
Just because you don't know about him doesn't mean he's an unknown.

http://thehockeywriters.com/mason-mc...spect-profile/
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2014, 09:31 PM   #50
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Smith, but I think both of them were picked too high and are being overrated in the prospect rankings.
Out of curiosity, why is that? They're barely in the top 20 and they're both this year's 2nd round picks. The rest of the players are older free agent types with limited upside (or guys with no upside like Thiessen and Acolatse) or older late round picks. The only guys I could see people arguing for over Smith and McDonald would be Culkin and Kanzig possibly or maybe Hickey (but let's be honest may 0.1% of the forum has seen him play even 1 game). I know people are voting for guys like Wolf based off them making the team sooner, but are they really better prospects?
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy