View Poll Results: Top Flames prospect left on the list?
|
Ollas Mattson
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Carroll
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Hanowski
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Arnold
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Hickey
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Kulak
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Van Brabant
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Billins
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Knight
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Wolf
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Poirier
|
  
|
6 |
1.21% |
Roy
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Smith
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Gilmour
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Ramage
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Gaudreau
|
  
|
307 |
62.02% |
Gillies
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Ortio
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Jooris
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Kanzig
|
  
|
1 |
0.20% |
Agostino
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Cundari
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Jankowski
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Granlund
|
  
|
2 |
0.40% |
McDonald
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Deblouw
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Reinhart
|
  
|
1 |
0.20% |
Ferland
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Klimchuck
|
  
|
1 |
0.20% |
Sieloff
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Rafikov
|
  
|
1 |
0.20% |
Culkin
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Bennett
|
  
|
169 |
34.14% |
Baertschi
|
  
|
7 |
1.41% |
Harrison
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Elson
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Wotherspoon
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
07-11-2014, 06:38 PM
|
#141
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Bennett, then Gaudreau, I'd have Poirier, Baertschi, Klimchuk after that, Jankowski in the next group.
Totally solid forward base, nice to see.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 06:45 PM
|
#142
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Gilmour was a great player. The Flames took a real hit when Risebrough gave him away for nothing. But outside of a couple of monster years in Toronto he was a 2nd line center. He was a 2nd line center in St. Louis, he was a 2nd line center in Calgary, and he was a 2nd line center, or lower, in the other cities he finished his career in. If Bennett has a career as good as Gilmour's we will all be exceptionally happy. It is far from an insult to suggest that Bennett has Gilmour upside.
|
Gilmour was better than a point per game for close to a decade.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 06:55 PM
|
#143
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
|
That was an easy choice. Can we have round 2 up soon to vote for Bennett?
Rounds 3 to 8 are going to be tricky though. It will be a difficult decision ranking Baertschi, Ortio, and Granlund. I'm also wondering how high to have Gillies, Poirier, and Wotherspoon.
I am also very excited at the Flames prospect depth at forward but the lack of top defence prospects is concerning. Thankfully Gio and Brodie will be anchoring the D for years to come and the forward depth can eventually be traded for defence.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 08:06 PM
|
#144
|
Franchise Player
|
There is no rush, we have all summer.
I think Bingo does 1 per day, and sometimes there will be a run off poll.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 08:32 PM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Gilmour was a great player. The Flames took a real hit when Risebrough gave him away for nothing. But outside of a couple of monster years in Toronto he was a 2nd line center. He was a 2nd line center in St. Louis, he was a 2nd line center in Calgary, and he was a 2nd line center, or lower, in the other cities he finished his career in. If Bennett has a career as good as Gilmour's we will all be exceptionally happy. It is far from an insult to suggest that Bennett has Gilmour upside.
|
How often do 2nd line centers lead their team by 30 points? Gilmour did that with St. Louis. In Toronto he led the team by 50. 127 points when the next highest scorer had 74.
Even in New Jersey he was their top line center. Going to be hard to argue that when he was playing 5 minutes more than anyone else and putting up higher-points-per-game.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 08:36 PM
|
#146
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Bennett, then Gaudreau, I'd have Poirier, Baertschi, Klimchuk after that, Jankowski in the next group.
Totally solid forward base, nice to see.
|
I wanted Bennett before most on this board even heard of him but IMO people picking him first is because of draft status.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 08:39 PM
|
#147
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
I wanted Bennett before most on this board even heard of him but IMO people picking him first is because of draft status.
|
It is close enough that picking either is understandable without dismissing either opinion
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 08:50 PM
|
#148
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
I wanted Bennett before most on this board even heard of him but IMO people picking him first is because of draft status.
|
How do you think he got his draft status ...
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2014, 08:54 PM
|
#149
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
|
I picked Bennett, but it was really close. I think the difference in their ceilings is so close it's almost non-existent. For me it came down to playing style. I really love that nasty, in your face, aggressive kind of game that Bennett plays.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 09:03 PM
|
#150
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Bennett, then Gaudreau, I'd have Poirier, Baertschi, Klimchuk after that, Jankowski in the next group.
Totally solid forward base, nice to see.
|
He's my 3rd pick as well. I was initially upset when the Flames picked Poirier at 23 but Button and his crew knew what they were doing with that pick as that kid IMO is going to be a good NHL player for this organization.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 09:09 PM
|
#151
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
|

Sorry, had to be done
|
|
|
The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to Goodlad For This Useful Post:
|
A Shot Wide,
BACKCHECK!!!,
BeltlineFan,
Clever_Iggy,
Da_Chief,
dying4acup,
Fire,
Francis's Hairpiece,
freakinsaprikin,
getbak,
Huntingwhale,
icecube,
Mike F,
mile,
Monahan23,
MrMastodonFarm,
Neeper,
Party Elephant,
Read Only,
RyZ,
Scoreface,
sempuki,
shogged,
SportsJunky,
Street Pharmacist,
Stupid,
The Fonz,
WindomURL
|
07-11-2014, 09:10 PM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan
I agree with your points but you got that backwards, Granlund is 7 months younger.
|
Thanks, you're right. Even more reason to vote Granlund ahead of Sven.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 09:17 PM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Gilmour was a great player. The Flames took a real hit when Risebrough gave him away for nothing. But outside of a couple of monster years in Toronto he was a 2nd line center. He was a 2nd line center in St. Louis, he was a 2nd line center in Calgary, and he was a 2nd line center, or lower, in the other cities he finished his career in. If Bennett has a career as good as Gilmour's we will all be exceptionally happy. It is far from an insult to suggest that Bennett has Gilmour upside.
|
He was a 2nd line center in Calgary because the Flames were absolutely filthy at the time. Nieuwendyk and Gilmour were definitely #1 centers, and Otto was probably a very good #2 center.
It is like saying Malkin is only a 2nd liner.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2014, 09:54 PM
|
#154
|
Scoring Winger
|
Gilmour was over PPG in 9 straight years. He put up 127 points one year and you're telling me, he was a good #2c, but not a #1c. You're on more crack than Rob Ford
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 09:57 PM
|
#155
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahan23
Gilmour was over PPG in 9 straight years. He put up 127 points one year and you're telling me, he was a good #2c, but not a #1c. You're on more crack than Rob Ford
|
He also happens to be in the top 20 of all time point leaders in the NHL. I really hope we get a 2 line C like him.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2014, 10:05 PM
|
#156
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
I wanted Bennett before most on this board even heard of him but IMO people picking him first is because of draft status.
|
Need the date and time when you decided you wanted Bennett, Then we can poll most people on this board and see if they'd hear of him before then. Thanks
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2014, 10:24 PM
|
#157
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch
How do you think he got his draft status ...
|
I think and hope that Bennett is the real deal.... but he got his draft status because he fell into a draft that was weak on elite talent. Had he been a year older chances are he would have been picked outside the top 10.... definitely after #6 Monahan and likely #7 Nurse and #8 Ristolainen and #9 Horvat and #10 Nichushkin.
Last edited by ricardodw; 07-11-2014 at 10:27 PM.
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 10:24 PM
|
#158
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief
Need the date and time when you decided you wanted Bennett, Then we can poll most people on this board and see if they'd hear of him before then. Thanks
|
Maybe try the search function!
|
|
|
07-11-2014, 10:27 PM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
I think and hope that Bennett is the real deal.... but he got his draft status because he fell into a really good draft. Had he been a year older chances are he would have been picked outside the top 10.... definitely after #6 Monahan and #7 Nurse and #8 Ristolainen and #9 Horvat and #10 Nichushkin.
|
I think he would likely get picked after Jones and before Lindholm/Monahan.
There is no way Bennett falls after Horvat - I think there would be more of a debate choosing between Barkov/Bennett (although most would easily take Barkov) than Horvat/Bennett.
Last edited by mile; 07-11-2014 at 10:33 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-11-2014, 10:30 PM
|
#160
|
Franchise Player
|
If I was voting who would be the best prospect in the next couple of years, I would have voted Gaudreau . I'm voting in 5 years time and taking Bennett . I really feel he will be the player we need to win playoff rounds/ Stanley cups , in 5+ years time.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 AM.
|
|