Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2014, 12:40 PM   #381
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
I wonder if there is interest in Mason Raymond this time with the change in management.

28 years old, lots of speed. Could do it on a 1-2 year deal at 1-2 per.

I like Raymond but I think I would rather give up that roster spot to Granlund or Reinhart.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:41 PM   #382
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Neither of those proposals comes close to getting Johansen, IMO. I would guess something like 2015 1st + Backlund + Baertschi/Gaudreau.

But he isn't going to be traded, so it's pretty moot.

Edit: and to be clear, I would not do that. The Flames are not in a position yet to be giving up on future assets for a player like Johansen - they don't have the wingers to play with him yet anyway.

Let's wait a couple years and see what we've got - THEN we can exchange assets for missing pieces

Last edited by Enoch Root; 06-30-2014 at 12:44 PM.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2014, 12:43 PM   #383
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I would not trade JG straight up for Johanssen. With his skill and hockey sense I truly believe JG will be one of the top 5 players in the NHL in 3-5 years time. Big pass.
Everyone has their own opinion and I respect that.

I guess the way I look at it:

Johansson will probably be around a ~70-80 point player next season

Gaudreau has a lot of question marks and in a few years he might get 100+ points a year or he might be in the KHL because his size couldn't do it.

Don't get me wrong, I wish Gaudreau becomes the player you described but I would rather take an already proven player at the NHL level who is only 1 year older than Gaudreau.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:45 PM   #384
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Pretty sure they'd do it for a B+ prospect in Sven , an NHL ready player in Backlund 2nd/3rd line C who is perfectly capable of replacing Johanssen's minutes, and arguably a high 2nd round pick in 2015.
Uhhhh no. Again they wouldn't deal Johansen to move up to the top 3 this year. He's their upcoming franchise centre. They value him similarly to how we value Monahan or Bennett. No way we'd deal either of those guys for the package you're suggesting and CBJ is not moving Johansen. He's arguably their most untouchable player so all these proposals are silly.
Flames Draft Watcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:46 PM   #385
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

If they piss off Johansen, just like Colorado has done with O'Reilly...there may be appetite for a swap?
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:48 PM   #386
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Pretty sure they'd do it for a B+ prospect in Sven , an NHL ready player in Backlund 2nd/3rd line C who is perfectly capable of replacing Johanssen's minutes, and arguably a high 2nd round pick in 2015.
Yeah not a chance that is a pretty awful proposal. What team in their right kind would trade a 21 year old big body C who scored 30+ goals last season for 2 smaller players that have had injury concerns. Backlund is 25 and never hit 20 goals or 40pts in a season yet he aldes right into johanssens spot? Sven can't crack a roster that finishes bottom 4 and when he went to the minors struggled for the most part

Your offer screams of homerism. Columbus is not trading their best young player since Nash for our second rate stuff. Columbus is better off giving him $6M x 8 years than take your mediocre package
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2014, 12:48 PM   #387
Racki
First Line Centre
 
Racki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Ryan Rishaug @TSNRyanRishaug
Oilers still interested in Engelland, told there are 9 other teams. Also told they made a strong presentation to Fayne, being considered.
I know we have two tough guys already but I would be shocked if the Flames weren't one of the 9 teams in on Engelland. He can play the wing on your 4th line or be your #6 defenseman.
__________________
Racki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:49 PM   #388
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Pretty sure they'd do it for a B+ prospect in Sven , an NHL ready player in Backlund 2nd/3rd line C who is perfectly capable of replacing Johanssen's minutes, and arguably a high 2nd round pick in 2015.
Hahaha what?

Would you trade a 21 year old Monahan coming off a 30 goal - 60 point season for a B level prospect, someone who replaces his minutes and 2 round pick? Yeah I guess not. Ryan Johansen isn't going anywhere. If their GM hung up on Florida for the 1st overall pick then why would he want that package from us or anyone else. That proposal is laughable.
__________________

ClubFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:51 PM   #389
SvenTastic47
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

@DarrenDreger: The Flames were aggressive pre-draft. Offered to take on Mike Ribeiro for 12th pick (Ribeiro wouldn't waive). Ultimately, he was bought out.
SvenTastic47 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SvenTastic47 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2014, 12:51 PM   #390
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yuk. Ribiero as a Flame?

Edit: Well, we know now that they're going to be active in the over age player department. All bets are off IMO on how they choose to shape this roster for the coming season.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:52 PM   #391
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SvenTastic47 View Post
@DarrenDreger: The Flames were aggressive pre-draft. Offered to take on Mike Ribeiro for 12th pick (Ribeiro wouldn't waive). Ultimately, he was bought out.
What's a 12th pick?
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:53 PM   #392
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Yuk. Ribiero as a Flame?
take him and a pick, it wasn't about Ribiero
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:54 PM   #393
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iggysback05 View Post
I know we have two tough guys already but I would be shocked if the Flames weren't one of the 9 teams in on Engelland. He can play the wing on your 4th line or be your #6 defenseman.
I want either Engelland or Douglas Murray for the 6th/7th spot. Flames need that size and toughness on the back end. I don't care how slow they are, we aren't making the playoffs anyways.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:54 PM   #394
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Yuk. Ribiero as a Flame?

Edit: Well, we know now that they're going to be active in the over age player department. All bets are off IMO on how they choose to shape this roster for the coming season.
because they wanted to acquire a pick for taking a bad contract?
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:54 PM   #395
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Yuk. Ribiero as a Flame?

Edit: Well, we know now that they're going to be active in the over age player department. All bets are off IMO on how they choose to shape this roster for the coming season.
Whose to say the Flames werent going to buy him out too? Basically a 1st for money spending.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Husky For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2014, 12:55 PM   #396
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

We would have just bought out Ribero to save ARZ the cap money, or Treliving still thought he could be redeemed.

Perlini ended up going 12th overall to Arizona but my guess would be that we would have then used 12 to try and move up to get Ritchie.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:56 PM   #397
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
What's a 12th pick?
...the 12th overall pick
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:56 PM   #398
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SvenTastic47 View Post
@DarrenDreger: The Flames were aggressive pre-draft. Offered to take on Mike Ribeiro for 12th pick (Ribeiro wouldn't waive). Ultimately, he was bought out.
I would have made that deal. I sure hope GM's are learning their lessons of handing out way too many NMC's for non-elite players.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2014, 12:57 PM   #399
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

that would have been sweet.

trade him , buy him out, and get another first rounder in the process.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2014, 12:57 PM   #400
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Well these deals and offers didn't pan out. Safe to say the value on the picks are far more valuable than the money they're keeping. Cool for swinging for the fences and all but maybe they should have aimed lower and upgraded their COL pick or the PITT pick to take on the salary..

FYI, I'd have been very happy with Ward and their third for Pitts pick. seems lke a right move.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy