Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: How would you rate the Flames draft this season?
10 18 6.95%
9 32 12.36%
8 94 36.29%
7 80 30.89%
6 23 8.88%
5 7 2.70%
4 2 0.77%
3 0 0%
2 0 0%
1 3 1.16%
Voters: 259. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2014, 11:55 AM   #21
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

We got potentially the best player in the draft with Bennett. Who cares about the rest, if they work out then good, if not then oh well.

Just wish there were more deals.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 11:58 AM   #22
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

We got Bennett and that's all I care about too. The rest.. ill let you know in a few years.
Miniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 11:59 AM   #23
Southside
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

Getting Bennett is great. He will be a player. From there on it didn't quite go as expected, sure. But, I think it will be alright. In the last few years we injected a good deal of skill and smarts. With this draft it seems we injected some size and grit (including the trade). Creating some balance? I saw the need to add a goaltender to the system again, didn't expect it to happen at 34, but, trust the scouts.
Southside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:01 PM   #24
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Bennett was a home run - 10/10

After that:

McDonald (8/10) - I was hoping for a right handed defenseman, but grabbing the best goaltending prospect in the draft is never a bad thing.

Smith (10/10) - This was the guy I was hoping the Flames would pick and they did not disappoint. Huge with good hands and showed a major improvement this season. He's a riser, not a faller, and that is always good to see when you pick a big kid.

Hickey (5/10) - Was hoping for a defenseman who shot right. Looks like a good enough kid, but appears to be more of a long term prospect. Like that he is compared to TJ Brodie. Give me a team of TJ Brodies.

Bollig acquisition (7/10) - If it means the end of Westgarth, then 10/10! You look for guys that make the team better and stronger, even on the 4th line. Bollig comes from a winner and contributed to that team greatly. The 4th line punishing guys in the first half of the game makes it harder on those guys later in the game. Gives room to your smaller and skilled players to do their thing and win games. Very good move!

Mattsson (9/10) - When you get a guy ranked 50th at this pick, what is not to like? My only concern is that I don't like to pick fallers. He dropped a long ways. Hopefully he works out because he's big and is supposedly smart.

Carroll (10/10) - Big guy on the RW that scores? What is not to like? If any of the other names called after him make the NHL, then you can bitch and complain about how the Flames wasted a draft pick.

Overall 8/10

Pretty happy because they addressed a few needs in the organization. Got another great center. Got the best goaltender available in the draft. Got a couple of huge RWers!!! Nothing is guaranteed, but I like this draft. I think we did better than we did in 2012, and that was a pretty good draft for the Flames too.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2014, 12:07 PM   #25
nemanja2306
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Exp:
Default

I love the Smith pick. Even if he tops out as a 3rd line winger, he still fits an organizational need. Big RW to play with one of our plethora of small LW. Plus, with his size and strength, I think he might actually be a viable option on the PP. I could see him hiting 40pts.
nemanja2306 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:08 PM   #26
Red John
First Line Centre
 
Red John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saXon View Post
Those numbers don't quite add up.

None of the numbers do.

Nothing funnier than seeing posters giving number grades to players they've only ever read about or watched a 5 minute highlight clip on YouTube.

Especially the later round picks. It's one thing not to like a certain player or what not. But to assign grades as if you've scouted the player all year long...pathetic.

Can't wait for the inevitable "who were the winners and losers" thread.
__________________
Tyger! Tyger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
Red John is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Red John For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2014, 12:10 PM   #27
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Bennett pretty much fell to us, so it's hard to give him credit for that. It's good that he didn't go reaching I suppose, but would be like saying Poile hit a homerun by selecting Jones last year. It was a no-brainer at that point.

As for the rest of the picks, I don't know much about them. I think there were a few good choices at #34. I didn't know anything about Poirier last year and wouldn't change that pick at this point, so I will wait and see with McDonald.

Hunter seems like a bit of a project, but that is what picks past the first 40 or so are good for.

I have no opinion on the other picks.

The Bollig acquisition is a minor annoyance for me, but it isn't going to make or break the day.

I give them a B.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 06-28-2014 at 12:12 PM.
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:10 PM   #28
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
Bennett was a home run.

After that

McDonald - 6/10
Smith - 2/10
Hickey - 5/10
Bollig acquisition - 0/10
Mattsson - 8/10
Carroll - 0/10

2nd and beyond - 6/10
Overall 8/10
Sorry bud but Carroll 0/10 with a 7th rounder. You've lost quite a bit of cred in my books.

After the 1st pick, some questionable acquisitions but I like the thought process behind them.
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:14 PM   #29
Mightyfire89
And I Don't Care...
 
Mightyfire89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The land of the eternally hopeful
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red John View Post
None of the numbers do.

Nothing funnier than seeing posters giving number grades to players they've only ever read about or watched a 5 minute highlight clip on YouTube.

Especially the later round picks. It's one thing not to like a certain player or what not. But to assign grades as if you've scouted the player all year long...pathetic.

Can't wait for the inevitable "who were the winners and losers" thread.
Yeah, I especially like the 0/10 grades for Austin Carroll. How silly.
__________________
Mightyfire89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:14 PM   #30
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Not sure how they can get credit for Bennett. IMO its an easy pick to make plus they didn't move up etc to strategically take him.

The rest of the draft picks I feel on first impression was fairly poor.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:14 PM   #31
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

I'd have to grade it as a "C". Made the obvious "A" pick in the first round and I like Hickey and the big Swede... YMMV but I feel like they wasted the others.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:17 PM   #32
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
Sorry bud but Carroll 0/10 with a 7th rounder. You've lost quite a bit of cred in my books.

After the 1st pick, some questionable acquisitions but I like the thought process behind them.

I think some people feel he could have just been signed as a free agent after the draft. He is from Calgary, came to the development camp last year, and is an overager in junior. It seems like there would be a good chance the Flames could have signed him..

The 7th rounder could have been used on a long shot "you never know" type of prospect. But of course there is a chance another team would sign Carroll. Personally, I would have liked the try signing him as a free agent.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:18 PM   #33
Read Only
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

9/10

Loved the Bennett pick, would have preferred McKeown but like McDonald, loved the Smith pick, the Bollig trade was fine and made sense, all the late picks seem fine.

Didn't do anything I didn't like although would have liked to see some vets move but still time for that over the summer.

Good first impression from Trevilling as GM.
Read Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:19 PM   #34
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

Still can't believe Bennett fell to us. Thank you Drais for publicly saying you want to be an Oiler. Both will be great players, but Bennett is the guy we really need in the system.

If it was noted as a weak draft then I don't mind drafting the first goalie early.

Not going to pretend I've seen these later picks play, but from what I've read Smith was a great pick, especially at that position.

Bollig for a late 3rd isn't the end of the world. As was mentioned, he can better replace Westgarth.

8/10

Last edited by Bandwagon In Flames; 06-28-2014 at 12:24 PM.
Bandwagon In Flames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:20 PM   #35
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

In a simplistic manner, 10/10.

They used their picks to address glaring needs in the organization.

RW? Check
G? Check
D? Check x2
High end Center? That's a big 10-4!

Size? Oh yeah.
Truculence? Yep x2 (Bollig, Smith)

Sure they didn't take players off of CP's board but they did make the picks necessary to address their needs. That's all I could ask for.

As for guys I am really pumped on? McDonald, sounds like he'll be a contender for the WJC starters role this year, good move.

Smith. Big, greasy RW who has some good upside, no quams here.

Hickey, after listening to Button on the Fan, says one of the best skaters in this draft, plays sound D, will be interesting to see if he ends up being Brodie 2.0.

Mattson, Really really happy with this pick in the 6th, U-17 Swedens Captain, open to coming over to CHL. Buton loves his leadership qualities and IQ. Great value on a 6th round pick. Could be the steal of this draft.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
GGG
Old 06-28-2014, 12:21 PM   #36
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
Sorry bud but Carroll 0/10 with a 7th rounder. You've lost quite a bit of cred in my books.
I've watched Carroll before and he wasn't notable at all. Of the walk ons last year, he was near the bottom of the pack, only Linden Penner was definitively worse among the forward group. All things being equal, I would've rather drafted a big D-man like Nick Wolf with the 7th.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca

Last edited by Caged Great; 06-28-2014 at 12:23 PM.
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:22 PM   #37
Rhettzky
Franchise Player
 
Rhettzky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
Exp:
Default

Love getting Bennett and Bollig. Have no clue about the other guys but would rate the CP draft drama as 8.5/10. Would bang.
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
Rhettzky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rhettzky For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2014, 12:22 PM   #38
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red John View Post
Nothing funnier than seeing posters giving number grades to players they've only ever read about or watched a 5 minute highlight clip on YouTube.
My numbers were not based on the performance or potential of the player, but that of the GM. I thought we were rating that performance, not the player?
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2014, 12:23 PM   #39
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhettzky View Post
Love getting Bennett and Bollig. Have no clue about the other guys but would rate the CP draft drama as 8.5/10. Would bang.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2014, 12:23 PM   #40
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husky View Post
Not sure how they can get credit for Bennett. IMO its an easy pick to make plus they didn't move up etc to strategically take him.

The rest of the draft picks I feel on first impression was fairly poor.

How is this a bad thing? Sometimes it's the moves not made that you need to give management credit for.

It was confirmed the Flames were looking into swapping for 2nd pick. Seems they did their research and knew Bennett would likely fall to them.

Perhaps if Florida had traded their pick and Ekblad wasn't taken 1st overall, the Flames would of moved up.
Bandwagon In Flames is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy