06-27-2014, 11:51 AM
|
#61
|
First Line Centre
|
Step One: Draft Reinhart at #4
Step 2: Trade Giordano and our two 2nd round picks for Griffin Reinhart and #5
Step 3: Play an all Reinhart team in 2015
Step 4: Profit?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wood For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:51 AM
|
#62
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
If it comes down to Johnny and Sven, it's got to be Sven.
If they deal Johnny for Ritchie I may never forgive them.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:52 AM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
Ugh if they pick Ritchie over either Sam's - I may throw my TV out my window. I really hope Brad is just pumping the hype machine so Ekblad/Sam/Sam fall down to #4
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto-matic For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:54 AM
|
#64
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
Baertschi has not proven he is elite level talent.
Ritchie is more highly touted than Baertschi was in his draft year, and he has "size", which our management is placing a premium on. With Gaundreau already in the system, it's very likely management could see one of Baertschi or Gaudreau as expendable in the name of increasing size at the position.
I'm not a guy who wants to see Sven dealt, but I could understand why if Ritchie was the end game.
|
If management thinks Gaudreau is expandable, the most exciting prospect the flames have had since the 80's, then we are so, so, so, so, so, so, so, ####ed.
He has proven this year that his ceiling is higher than any prospect in this draft.
Literally the most exciting thing the Flames have going for them for the next 5 years is Gaudreau.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:54 AM
|
#65
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic
Ugh if they pick Ritchie over either Sam's - I may throw my TV out my window. I really hope Brad is just pumping the hype machine so Ekblad/Sam/Sam fall down to #4
|
Agreed.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:55 AM
|
#66
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I wouldn't take the word of some SN hack will little actual connection to the Flames.
But that aside, if Florida wants to grab Ritchie they can go right ahead.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:56 AM
|
#67
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
If management thinks Gaudreau is expandable, the most exciting prospect the flames have had since the 80's, then we are so, so, so, so, so, so, so, ####ed.
He has proven this year that his ceiling is higher than any prospect in this draft.
|
Look at the position though - if you project Gaudreau and Baertschi as both top 6 LW'ers, I can understand the organization wanting to move one of them in a deal for Ritchie as he also projects as a top 6 LW'er and brings a different dynamic than Gaudreau/Baertschi.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:56 AM
|
#68
|
First Line Centre
|
I would have to believe the Flames would be targeting Ritchie or Virtanen with that 2nd pick. Id be shocked if they were interested in Ehlers or Nylander.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:58 AM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
|
If Treliving can somehow pull it off without losing Gaudreau, Monahan, or Brodie I'm all for it. If prefer keeping Sven too as I feel giving up on him this early may come back to haunt us, but you've got to give to get. Backlund + Sven + 2nd rounder for another top 10?
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:59 AM
|
#70
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary
|
I don't see what Sven has done at the NHL or AHL level to make him an "elite" prospect. I highly doubt any of the teams we've talked to are interested in him although I'm sure he's become part of the conversation from our end.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:59 AM
|
#71
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
If management thinks Gaudreau is expandable, the most exciting prospect the flames have had since the 80's, then we are so, so, so, so, so, so, so, ####ed.
|
If Gaudreau was "expandable" that would make him even more exciting. Mo more "he's too small" talk.
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
Calgary4LIfe,
ComixZone,
dammage79,
Goodlad,
GreenHardHat,
jayswin,
ollischr,
Phanuthier,
Rifleman,
Street Pharmacist,
Zevo
|
06-27-2014, 11:59 AM
|
#72
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyZ
I would have to believe the Flames would be targeting Ritchie or Virtanen with that 2nd pick. Id be shocked if they were interested in Ehlers or Nylander.
|
Why? Nylander has RW/C with a RH shot, something the teams values and needs just as much as size. Ehlers....Dude is top four skill in this draft. He'd be sick to have. The more to the world than Nick Ritchie.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2014, 11:59 AM
|
#73
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
Look at the position though - if you project Gaudreau and Baertschi as both top 6 LW'ers, I can understand the organization wanting to move one of them in a deal for Ritchie as he also projects as a top 6 LW'er and brings a different dynamic than Gaudreau/Baertschi.
|
Sven, I'd consider, but I really think Gaudreau should be off the table barring something outrageous, like an under 22 year old who has proven to be star in the NHL. Which isn't going to happen.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 12:00 PM
|
#74
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Ugh just don't get my hopes up of adding another pick like the Raptors last night, and end up with a total dud draft day.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2014, 12:00 PM
|
#75
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Why? Nylander has RW/C with a RH shot, something the teams values and needs just as much as size. Ehlers....Dude is top four skill in this draft. He'd be sick to have. The more to the world than Nick Ritchie.
|
Likely due to the fact that Ritchie has been named as being in our "top 5" and brings the much desired size-element.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 12:00 PM
|
#76
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
If Gaudreau was "expandable" that would make him even more exciting. Mo more "he's too small" talk.
|
Haha crap.
Expendable....
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2014, 12:01 PM
|
#77
|
Franchise Player
|
Might as well load up for the next couple of years on draft picks. The old guys are not going to be around when things start improving so if you can dump them do it. And then you can let the young guys grow together.
Last years draft was great. Do it again this year and next and we should be good to go in about 2 to 3 years. Then you can start sprinkling in veterans to fill gaps or roles.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 12:01 PM
|
#78
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
Sven, I'd consider, but I really think Gaudreau should be off the table barring something outrageous, like an under 22 year old who has proven to be star in the NHL. Which isn't going to happen.
|
Agreed, I'd sooner move Sven than Johnny - I was just trying to explain why I could see management making such a move (such as Sven + 34 + a vet for the 5th pick).
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 12:03 PM
|
#79
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
If Flames could take some big salary/prohibitve (to some) contract along with the second top 10 pick, and give up a solid roster player, minor prospect, and a pick of their own (one of the second rounders), that would be ideal.
Carolina and FLA would be two teams to fit that mold of needing to maybe shed...FLA is likley out at #1.
|
|
|
06-27-2014, 12:03 PM
|
#80
|
Uncle Chester
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
Please don't give up Johnny Hockey. Please.
|
Jesus, that never even entered my mind.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM.
|
|