Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2014, 12:06 PM   #41
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
We have seen with all the compliance buyouts over the past few seasons that these long term deals simply don't make sense the majority of the time. IMO teams are simply going to push for another set of compliance buyouts next CBA so they can rinse and repeat as teams with a lot of money are trying to win now and have no issues paying later on a compliance buyout.
Won't even get that far this is an early retirement contract. No intention of playing the full term.

No recapture penalties, no 35+ year old contract that will count against the cap no matter what.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:08 PM   #42
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

I'm surprised how few like this deal. Seems like a great deal for the Kings to me.

They're obviously in win now mode, and a low AAV of 4.9 will help them try to get to a third cup over the next 2 or 3 years. After that, they can probably eat 1M off the contract and AAV and move him to another team if he isn't as affective anymore. Or, as a few have mentioned, he could retire or if injuries catch up to him just ride out the deal on LTIR.

There are still plenty of loopholes in the CBA and this contract will try to use lots of them.

Another way to look at it... would you rather have Boland at 5+ for a similar term? Vanek at 7+? He fit perfectly into their team and was a huge contributor to the cup win. Darryl said he was the key to the cup shortly after they won. Lombardi doesn't make many mistakes, and I'm sure he has an exit strategy for this contract before it becomes a burden.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to mikephoen For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2014, 12:13 PM   #43
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

First Greene to 4 years then Gaborik for 7. Lombardi got some attachment issues lol.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:14 PM   #44
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
We have seen with all the compliance buyouts over the past few seasons that these long term deals simply don't make sense the majority of the time. IMO teams are simply going to push for another set of compliance buyouts next CBA so they can rinse and repeat as teams with a lot of money are trying to win now and have no issues paying later on a compliance buyout.
Of course the next CBA will have compliance buy outs. I'm sure teams knew there would be compliance buyouts long before the last CBA was signed.

It's not like the PA wants to stop them, as it's great for their players. It gets money into their hands that is outside the 50% of HRR. It's a sneaky concession to the big market teams that we'll see again and again in all capped leagues in my opinion.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:14 PM   #45
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I really like this signing for LA. He's cheap for the next 3 years at least and 5 million won't be terrible after that.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:14 PM   #46
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Won't even get that far this is an early retirement contract. No intention of playing the full term.

No recapture penalties, no 35+ year old contract that will count against the cap no matter what.
Do we know the contract structure yet?

If it's front loaded then there would be recapture penalties. If it isn't front loaded then why would he retire early when he's making almost 5M per year?
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:15 PM   #47
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
No recapture penalties, no 35+ year old contract that will count against the cap no matter what.
So he can retire at any point in the contract without penalty to the cap, and/or they could buy him out after age 35 at any time without it counting against the cap?

Outstanding deal all round then
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:16 PM   #48
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen View Post
It's not like the PA wants to stop them, as it's great for their players. It gets money into their hands that is outside the 50% of HRR. It's a sneaky concession to the big market teams that we'll see again and again in all capped leagues in my opinion.
Someone had stated before that the buyouts did count towards the player split of HRR.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:16 PM   #49
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
Do we know the contract structure yet?

If it's front loaded then there would be recapture penalties. If it isn't front loaded then why would he retire early when he's making almost 5M per year?
There are no recapture penalties for contracts signed under the new CBA.

LeBrun already tweeted he expected the final year of the contract to be the minimum value allowed by the new front loading rules.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2014, 12:19 PM   #50
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
Will have to see yr-by-yr breakdown of Gaborik deal but IF he decides to walk away from any remaining yrs, there are no cap hits/penalties.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:22 PM   #51
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
So he can retire at any point in the contract without penalty to the cap, and/or they could buy him out after age 35 at any time without it counting against the cap?

Outstanding deal all round then
If they buy him out it will count against the cap.

What I meant is that this contract comes in effect before Gaborik turns 35 years old.

under the cba if a player's multi-year contract comes in effect after they turn 35, the contract will fully count against the cap regardless if the player retires or is buried in the minors
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2014, 12:23 PM   #52
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Pierre LeBrun @Real_ESPNLeBrun
Told the last 2 years of Gaborik's deal help bring down the AAV to $4.875 M
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:27 PM   #53
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Given his injury history, chances are he will retire early due to injury problems and the insurance company will be left footing the cost while the Kings and Gaborik walk away laughing.

Good deal IMO.
Well, then I suppose it's lucky for Gaborik and the Kings, that there is no one working at "the insurance company" that has as much insight as some randon internet poster.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:31 PM   #54
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:32 PM   #55
Anduril
Franchise Player
 
Anduril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

This is effectively a 4 or 5 year contract. A little long, but not too unreasonable given the caphit.
Anduril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:36 PM   #56
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Not much incentive to retire early if he would still be getting 3.5M per year.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:58 PM   #57
ignite09
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Cammy must be happy he didn't sign with us early. Looks like he's about to get paid.
ignite09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 01:01 PM   #58
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The Kings better hope he retires early and stays relatively injury-free (which is highly doubtful). Good chance it's a buy-out candidate in 3 years.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 01:04 PM   #59
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

I doubt a 37 year old walks away from 7 more million dollars, but I guess we'll see. The landscape can change so much between now and then
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 01:09 PM   #60
sevenarms
Powerplay Quarterback
 
sevenarms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

The cap is projected to continue to rise. Say it's at $80M 5 years down the road and Gaborik wants to keep playing. His contract will eat up a hair over 6% of the team cap. That's not bad at all for the Kings.
__________________
"Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it."
-Steve Prefontaine
sevenarms is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy