Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2014, 11:38 AM   #61
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

I'm a big fan of Colborne, he fits in nicely in the top 6, IMO.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2014, 11:44 AM   #62
theoforever
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

The only team that Colborne looks like a top 6 player is the one that competes for the top draft pick. I like the guy and he showed improvement as the year went along, wing position looks good on him.
If he puts another 10lbs this summer and further develops who knows. Odds are he could be a good 3rd line player, needs some development for 2nd line. This upcoming year will tell the story what he is going to be in NHL.
theoforever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 11:44 AM   #63
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

You guys are high. Plays consistently died on Colborne's stick. If he's in the top 6 his team probably isn't going to be very good.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 11:46 AM   #64
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
You guys are high. Plays consistently died on Colborne's stick. If he's in the top 6 his team probably isn't going to be very good.
I'd give him a full year on the RW before we start criticizing his play. Keep in mind, he was still considered a rookie last year.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2014, 11:46 AM   #65
Clever_Iggy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever View Post
The only team that Colborne looks like a top 6 player is the one that competes for the top draft pick. I like the guy and he showed improvement as the year went along, wing position looks good on him.
If he puts another 10lbs this summer and further develops who knows. Odds are he could be a good 3rd line player, needs some development for 2nd line. This upcoming year will tell the story what he is going to be in NHL.
Ya, the good news is he's only 24. Some on the board will allege that he's peaked, but I think there's still plenty of room considering last year was his first full NHL season.
Clever_Iggy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Clever_Iggy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2014, 11:48 AM   #66
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
You guys are high. Plays consistently died on Colborne's stick. If he's in the top 6 his team probably isn't going to be very good.
It was his rookie season last year and his play did improve as the season progressed. He does have pretty soft hands and just needs to keep improving his overall play. I don't think he's top 3 material but it's a little early to write him off as a bottom 6 player.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 11:52 AM   #67
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Why does Colborne have to be top 6? He is a project and could turn out to be anything at this point. Toronto gave up on him too soon
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 11:53 AM   #68
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

I'd love to see a 3rd line this season of Baertschi Monahan Colborne
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
RyZ
Old 06-24-2014, 11:53 AM   #69
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
It was his rookie season last year and his play did improve as the season progressed. He does have pretty soft hands and just needs to keep improving his overall play. I don't think he's top 3 material but it's a little early to write him off as a bottom 6 player.
Not sure if labelling him as a bottom six player is writing him off. I don't see top 6 in his future but he's developed a good two-way game and has learned to use his size, especially in board play. Saying he has a future as a 3rd line winger, is good praise considering how he started last season.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 11:56 AM   #70
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

My draft list for the flames:

1. Bennett
2. Reinhart
3. Draisaitl
4. Ekblad

I'm just not convinced that Ekblad becomes anything more than a 3-4 d-man. Could be wrong, but I see more potential in the other 3, especially with drafting this high.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:00 PM   #71
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
I'd love to see a 3rd line this season of Baertschi Monahan Colborne
Monahan on the 3rd line? Stajan is more likely to shake out there. Backlund and Monahan are likely to be our 1-2 punch this year.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:03 PM   #72
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
My draft list for the flames:

1. Bennett
2. Reinhart
3. Draisaitl
4. Ekblad

I'm just not convinced that Ekblad becomes anything more than a 3-4 d-man. Could be wrong, but I see more potential in the other 3, especially with drafting this high.
So the #1 ranked player for this draft is only a 2nd pairing guy? That makes no sense. Ekblad has all the tools to be a top pairing shut down D with strong goal scoring.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2014, 12:04 PM   #73
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Monahan on the 3rd line? Stajan is more likely to shake out there. Backlund and Monahan are likely to be our 1-2 punch this year.
He'll only be 20 next season. I'd like to see him play 15 mins/game again, and see some sheltered minutes. I'd like Stajan + Backlund on lines 1 + 2 getting the tough minutes.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:06 PM   #74
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
So the #1 ranked player for this draft is only a 2nd pairing guy? That makes no sense. Ekblad has all the tools to be a top pairing shut down D with strong goal scoring.

He may be the consensus pick for Florida, but plenty of scouting services has Reinhart or Bennett in front of him. Plenty of scouts have mentioned that he a less of a prospect than Jones was last year.

I'm also weary of the fact that he's essentially been a full grown man since the age of 16. I'm just not sold that his game will translate to the NHL. Don't get me wrong, I think he will be good, but I think he's closer to Eric Johnson than Drew Doughty.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:11 PM   #75
theoforever
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
Ya, the good news is he's only 24. Some on the board will allege that he's peaked, but I think there's still plenty of room considering last year was his first full NHL season.
Definitely to early to tell and no way he has picked. The 2014/2015 season will give a good insight, to his potential. The 2015/2016 will define what he is for sure, so that would be 26. We could have a real steal here.
theoforever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:11 PM   #76
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Ekblad is ranked #2 at worst by almost every service. So he's overall the highest ranked player for this draft. Bob Mackenzie said 7/10 of the scouts he talked to have him 1st. His game obviously translates, why wouldn't it? Looks like a Rob Blake type to me.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:14 PM   #77
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Ekblad is ranked #2 at worst by almost every service. So he's overall the highest ranked player for this draft. Bob Mackenzie said 7/10 of the scouts he talked to have him 1st. His game obviously translates, why wouldn't it? Looks like a Rob Blake type to me.

I'm not sold on his game translating because he's been physically mature his entire junior career and therefore been able to dominate with his strength. Things are going to be much different at the NHL level.

Once again, not saying that he's not going to be good, just that for the flames needs I would rather have one of the 3 centers
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:19 PM   #78
19Yzerman19
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

He's a d-man. Not drafting d-men in the top 5 is quite simply a sound conservative drafting philosophy - they are inherently high risk, high reward. People ranking Ekblad below the other 3 are totally justified in doing so.
19Yzerman19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:31 PM   #79
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
I'm not sold on his game translating because he's been physically mature his entire junior career and therefore been able to dominate with his strength. Things are going to be much different at the NHL level.

Once again, not saying that he's not going to be good, just that for the flames needs I would rather have one of the 3 centers
I think there would be something to worry about IF Ekblad hadn't scored at nearly a PPG clip over the course of the season. In 58 games he scored 23 goals, 30 assists for 53 points. That is impressive to me, and makes me wonder why certain media outlets are questioning Ekblad's dynamism.

These people go on and on about Ekblad being 'no Seth Jones'. Jones, who is also 6'4" and has similar physical gifts, played 61 games & scored 14 goals and 42 assists for 56 points in his only season in the CHL. Very similar numbers, but on a Portland team that was stacked.

At worst Ekblad looks like he'll be the shutdown presence on a good team's 1st pairing. If his offence doesn't translate (which is ludicrous considering the cannon of a slapshot he possesses) he still has the physical and mental gifts to be a pretty special defenceman.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2014, 12:41 PM   #80
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
At worst Ekblad looks like he'll be the shutdown presence on a good team's 1st pairing. If his offence doesn't translate (which is ludicrous considering the cannon of a slapshot he possesses) he still has the physical and mental gifts to be a pretty special defenceman.
This. Ekblad apparently has among the highest hockey IQs in the entire draft. That's why he's a shut-down guy, not because he goes around crushing boys.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy