Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2014, 09:36 AM   #1
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Icon48 Blackhawks to play in yet another outdoor game. *yawn*

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sport...ticle19258146/

Chicago to be Washington's opponent in the Winter Classic.

I know why the NHL is doing it, but honestly, it isn't the frequency of outdoor games that is ruining the concept, but the repetitiveness of using the same teams over and over and over again.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2014, 09:37 AM   #2
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

How has Minny not had one yet?
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 09:40 AM   #3
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Ah yes, the great Blackhawks-Capitals rivalry.

It should be Minnesota.

I won't be watching this.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 09:41 AM   #4
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
How has Minny not had one yet?
For the same reason why the same six teams are always involved.

Minnesota doesn't have the same "national appeal". The Wild will get a Stadium Series game at some point, but I would be surprised if they were to be used in a Winter Classic any time soon.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 09:44 AM   #5
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Should have been Washington- Rangers or Washington- Habs.

At least those teams have met in some good playoff series in recent years.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 09:45 AM   #6
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

So many teams deserve to have one of these before Chicago gets their second one in a row. Meh.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 09:46 AM   #7
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Soon everyone will be getting excited for the novelty that indoor games will become...
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 09:47 AM   #8
Matt Reeeeead
Scoring Winger
 
Matt Reeeeead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

These events are about overall exposure to markets. The Blackhawks (and the like) continue to be used because it appeals to new fans who want to see exciting hockey.

Not about "who deserves", it's a business first. As exposure continues to grow, I think we continue seeing more variety like we did last year.
Matt Reeeeead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 09:51 AM   #9
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Reeeeead View Post
These events are about overall exposure to markets. The Blackhawks (and the like) continue to be used because it appeals to new fans who want to see exciting hockey.

Not about "who deserves", it's a business first. As exposure continues to grow, I think we continue seeing more variety like we did last year.
I get that they want exciting hockey, but lots of good teams haven't participated in an outdoor game yet. Colorado? St. Louis? San Jose? Minnesota? All of those teams can play great hockey. I think a St. Louis/Colorado outdoor game would be awesome.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 10:00 AM   #10
Matt Reeeeead
Scoring Winger
 
Matt Reeeeead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Maybe. Would that grip a random dude who has never watched hockey before? Teams that have yet to go far in the playoffs, and although have young talents, probably not recognizeable to a average joe.

I agree, it should happen, I'm guessing once guys like Mack get a chance on a bigger stage and up their instant appeal they will get their shot.
Matt Reeeeead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 10:01 AM   #11
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Reeeeead View Post
These events are about overall exposure to markets. The Blackhawks (and the like) continue to be used because it appeals to new fans who want to see exciting hockey.
Yup. The why for Chicago is obvious.

Quote:
Not about "who deserves", it's a business first. As exposure continues to grow, I think we continue seeing more variety like we did last year.
Agreed on the first sentence, disagreed on the second. The Winter Classic will never be about variety. It will always be about profit, and the NHL is going to repeat the same six or seven teams until the concept burns to the ground.

What we saw last year was two things: 1. an attempt to recoup lost revenue from the lockout. 2. An attempt (much like the 2011 Heritage Classic) to shut up teams clamoring for an outdoor game of their own and upset that the NHL won't even consider them for the Winter Classic.

The NHL has a catch-22 though in that it can't run so many "Stadium Series" and "Heritage Classic" games without diluting the one contest it really cares about. That is why we are likely to see only two outdoor games this year - the WC and one SS game.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 11:25 AM   #12
sharkov
Powerplay Quarterback
 
sharkov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Exp:
Default

Boston and Montreal should have been the next Winter classic in my opinion.
__________________
"Half the GM's in the league would trade their roster for our roster right now..." Kevin Lowe in 2013
sharkov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sharkov For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2014, 11:35 AM   #13
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I think Colorado at Minnesota would have been a great choice. 2 teams on the rise in strong-decent hockey markets.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 02:17 PM   #14
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Colorado and Minnesota both want to host their own outdoor games. They don't want to be the visiting team for someone else's outdoor game.

I believe the Wild already have one pencilled in for 2016 at Target Field. I'd bet that their opponent will be Dallas.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy