Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2014, 08:02 AM   #21
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Getting approved and getting built are two seperate things. Will it get approved? Most likely. Will it get built? We shall see how fierce the opposition really is.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2014, 08:28 AM   #22
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

There is no way Harper can deny it. If he denys the pipeline through his pristine wilderness how can he ever hope for the US to approve Keystone. I agree with SCD above that it actually getting built will still be a battle.

It think the enviromental impacts of the pipeline itself are overblown but the port concerns are huge. Shipping out heavy oil through kitamat is definately a legitamate concern. Eventually there will be an oil spill.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2014, 09:19 AM   #23
flylock shox
1 millionth post winnar!
 
flylock shox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Now world wide!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86 View Post
NDP are a strong leader away from being in power for 10 - 15 years in BC. Liberals can't keep playing with fire with doing stuff that smacks directly into the face of the voters.

If the people don't want it, the Liberals will put it to a referendum so they don't have to make a choice.
I'm not so sure about that. The distrust of the NDP runs deep here. Deep enough for them to lose what should have been a guaranteed win. I think they should rebrand completely.

If there's a referendum the pipeline is dead. Too little benefit to too few British Columbians at too high a price.
flylock shox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 09:52 AM   #24
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
That is not an option. It's either approve, not approve or send back to NEB.
Would the "approved" status not support the 209 conditions proposed by the NEB, though?
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 10:21 AM   #25
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Yeah, I don't think it really matters what happens at the federal level. The rumblings for a provincial referendum here in BC are already fairly loud and, if it goes to the ballot it'll get crushed.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 10:22 AM   #26
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flylock shox View Post
I'm not so sure about that. The distrust of the NDP runs deep here. Deep enough for them to lose what should have been a guaranteed win. I think they should rebrand completely.
That's because the NDP have yet to have a leader who was anything but a joke. Carole "The Robot" James had no charisma and absolutely no will to win an election. The Liberals should have been out after Campbell was nailed for dui. He certainly should have been forced to step down. But what did James do? Let it go. Just like she let every major mistake Campbell made go.

So after close to ten years of failure and letting the Liberals off the hook, who do the NDP go to? A guy who has barely any more leadership skills, but to make sure the Liberals were safe they also made sure he was one of the only guys with any connections left to the reason they've been a laughing stock since '99.

The NDP had access to more than one great candidate and instead they chose the one guy who would give the Liberals an opening. BC NDP can't save themselves from themselves, the entire leadership needs to be purged. But the Liberal leadership is shrewd enough to know they can't be as obnoxious as they were through the early 2000s. That political capital they gained by simply "Not being Glenn Clark's NDP" is all but gone. If the NDP end up with someone even half competent during the next election cycle, they could be in trouble.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 10:24 AM   #27
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86 View Post
That's because the NDP have yet to have a leader who was anything but a joke. Carole "The Robot" James had no charisma and absolutely no will to win an election. The Liberals should have been out after Campbell was nailed for dui. He certainly should have been forced to step down. But what did James do? Let it go. Just like she let every major mistake Campbell made go.

So after close to ten years of failure and letting the Liberals off the hook, who do the NDP go to? A guy who has barely any more leadership skills, but to make sure the Liberals were safe they also made sure he was one of the only guys with any connections left to the reason they've been a laughing stock since '99.

The NDP had access to more than one great candidate and instead they chose the one guy who would give the Liberals an opening. BC NDP can't save themselves from themselves, the entire leadership needs to be purged. But the Liberal leadership is shrewd enough to know they can't be as obnoxious as they were through the early 2000s. That political capital they gained by simply "Not being Glenn Clark's NDP" is all but gone. If the NDP end up with someone even half competent during the next election cycle, they could be in trouble.
Not to mention they've done just about done everything they can to alienate themselves from the public sector employees and various unions. The teachers' strike isn't even getting the usual 50/50 blame from the public. People are fully pissed at Clark and rightfully so.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 10:32 AM   #28
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeGeeWhy View Post
Would the "approved" status not support the 209 conditions proposed by the NEB, though?
If they approve it it has to comply with the 209 conditions. They can't cherry pick which conditions, it's either all or nothing, or send it back for further consideration to the NEB.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tinordi For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2014, 12:08 PM   #29
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Well this should go over well on this board...

Justin Trudeau, MP ‏@JustinTrudeau 8m Northern Gateway puts the coastal economy and the environment at risk. This is no place for a pipeline. Mr. Harper should reject it.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 12:25 PM   #30
Zevo
First Line Centre
 
Zevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube View Post
Well this should go over well on this board...

Justin Trudeau, MP ‏@JustinTrudeau 8m Northern Gateway puts the coastal economy and the environment at risk. This is no place for a pipeline. Mr. Harper should reject it.
Well now he HAS to approve it. Can't agree with that twat.
Zevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 12:26 PM   #31
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo View Post
Well now he HAS to approve it. Can't agree with that twat.
Since Trudeau supports Keystone XL, does that mean Harper should block it to avoid agreeing with "that twat"?
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 12:26 PM   #32
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo View Post
Well now he HAS to approve it. Can't agree with that twat.
It's the obvious political move for Trudeau to make. The Liberals are trying to claw back a few seats in BC, and Alberta is always a lost cause for them anyways.

EDIT: It's also more likely a move against the NDP than the Conservatives.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2014, 12:27 PM   #33
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

This is happening after market close today right?

edit: duh, in first post
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 12:29 PM   #34
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
This is happening after market close today right?

edit: duh, in first post
Correct
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 12:41 PM   #35
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube View Post
It's the obvious political move for Trudeau to make. The Liberals are trying to claw back a few seats in BC, and Alberta is always a lost cause for them anyways.

EDIT: It's also more likely a move against the NDP than the Conservatives.
Trudeau's actually been very clear about his opinion on Northern Gateway for awhile now. He mentioned support for the Energy East line though. We'll see if that past support holds up when it's Energy East's time to receive approval.
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 12:44 PM   #36
Handsome B. Wonderful
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Handsome B. Wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube View Post
Justin Trudeau, MP ‏@JustinTrudeau 8m Northern Gateway puts the coastal economy and the environment at risk. This is no place for a pipeline. Mr. Harper should reject it.
Nothing but political posturing for votes. Environmental groups don't create jobs, and don't provide revenue for the government. Trudeau knows what keeps this country running economically.
Handsome B. Wonderful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 12:48 PM   #37
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy89 View Post
Trudeau's actually been very clear about his opinion on Northern Gateway for awhile now. He mentioned support for the Energy East line though. We'll see if that past support holds up when it's Energy East's time to receive approval.
From what I've read, the only proposed pipeline Trudeau is specifically against is Northern Gateway. He's been a vocal supporter of Keystone XL, Energy East, and the proposed expansion of the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline that carries Alberta oil to BC's lower mainland.

http://commonsensecanadian.ca/REPORT...ine-vancouver/
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2014, 12:48 PM   #38
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'd rather see Energy East, KXL, and Transmountain go forward rather than Northern Gateway. Kinder Morgan's pipeline to Burnaby is a more sensible established route that puts tankers in Vancouver rather than Kitimat.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to burn_this_city For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2014, 12:52 PM   #39
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

So why is there preference for building a new pipeline over expanding the existing?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 12:53 PM   #40
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

You can't really expand the existing TM line, Kinder Morgan would be twinning it along the same right of way.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy