06-05-2014, 06:55 AM
|
#101
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon
I don't think I've ever been so pissed at a ruling party in Canada. The Liberals sure looked horrible when they 'passed the torch' in early 2000's, but I can't think of them ever so strong arming their base policies through government as much as these Conservatives have. Trying to change the country so much. There's always budget problems. Every party has those. People never agree where it should go, and there's never enough. But it feels like the Conservatives are actively trying to change the culture of the country. :/
|
"You won't recognize Canada when I'm through with it." - Stephen Harper, 2006
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-05-2014, 08:05 AM
|
#102
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon
But it feels like the Conservatives are actively trying to change the culture of the country.
|
This. I actually feel embarrassed when I think of how they've changed our culture from a very progressive (at the time) country to one where we're making fun of America's failed crime policies and at the same time watching our government do everything in their power to send us down the same road.
I still remember like ten years ago, watching SNL and other programs making jokes about how Canada is going to pot because we were one of the first countries to realize that smoking and possessing weed shouldn't be a crime.
Even though we were only going with decriminalization, it was still this massive, progressive step forward at the time, and despite the jokes, many in America were taking notice and saying "haha, our government would never even think of going that route".
Now ten years later our stupid government has become tougher than ever on weed, making sure that there's automatic minimum sentencing for charges, while the US is quickly heading towards legalization across the board.
We had our moment in the early 2000's, but now it will take decades to undo what the conservatives have done. And that's coming from someone who was a 100% conservative backer in the mid 2000's, thinking they were just so much better.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-05-2014, 08:42 AM
|
#103
|
A Fiddler Crab
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
|
I honestly have no idea how thinking individuals vote Conservative anymore. This prostitution legislation is so, so, so backwards. It's like something you'd expect to have come from Reagan's Administration.
|
|
|
06-05-2014, 08:56 AM
|
#104
|
Franchise Player
|
I didn't really follow the new bill since I assumed it would simply be the "opening up" of the laws that the supreme court was looking for.
To see it is basically the complete opposite is quite shocking, since it'll likely be heading straight to the SCC anyways.
|
|
|
06-05-2014, 08:58 AM
|
#105
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
I didn't really follow the new bill since I assumed it would simply be the "opening up" of the laws that the supreme court was looking for.
To see it is basically the complete opposite is quite shocking, since it'll likely be heading straight to the SCC anyways.
|
Not really. This is exactly what I was expecting from The Harper Government.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-05-2014, 09:36 AM
|
#106
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp: 
|
So when does this Bill become law?
|
|
|
06-05-2014, 09:44 AM
|
#107
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I really can't see this bill satifying the supreme court ruling. The laws might just be thrown out because the conservatives couldn't take a real approach that would have solved the issue. I believe they were given a year to come up with an alternative or the laws thrown out.
|
|
|
06-05-2014, 09:48 AM
|
#108
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Near as I can tell this is the do nothing response. From what I've read this new law effectively does nothing to address the courts findings from the Bedford decision. It's the proverbial lipstick on a pig.
Seems to me like it's a deliberate "kick the can" bit of legislation. Rather then address the constitutionality issues with the old law they've simply chosen to put up new laws with the same issues. It solves nothing, but the conservatives aren't going to be the ones that legalise prostitution (hand forced or not) so they've simply put out legislation that's as equally challangable as the old laws, so now they've "bought" themselves all the time that it will take to pass and give assent to the legislation and all the time that it will take new challanges to work their way through the court system up again to the SCC.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-05-2014, 10:39 AM
|
#109
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
|
The Conservatives had an opportunity to do something good here, and have totally messed it up.
I think it is far worse than doing nothing.
If this bill passes in its current form, it is destined to go back to the SCC and will cost us taxpayers millions. In the meantime, sex workers are forced back underground and undoubtedly some people will be harmed.
I'm really angry about this one. What a mess.
|
|
|
06-05-2014, 11:07 AM
|
#111
|
Franchise Player
|
At this point these guys are so out of touch with the Canadian public when it comes to social issues that you'd almost think it was defiance.
I'm embarrassed
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
06-05-2014, 11:39 AM
|
#112
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp: 
|
The government says it will spend $20-million to assist sex workers to leave the industry. But does Mr. MacKay seriously think this is going to reduce the number of women selling sex – or improve the lot of those who remain? Are there going to be any social program or is this a one time payment? $20-million will only get you so far in a country as vast as Canada that money will run out very fast.
|
|
|
06-05-2014, 02:12 PM
|
#113
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by prime333
The government says it will spend $20-million to assist sex workers to leave the industry.
|
... and probably at least that much on TV ads during sporting events to let us know that they are.
$20-million nationally, even if it's year over year and not just one time funding, is practically nothing.
|
|
|
06-05-2014, 03:52 PM
|
#114
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
... and probably at least that much on TV ads during sporting events to let us know that they are.
$20-million nationally, even if it's year over year and not just one time funding, is practically nothing.
|
For sure, $19 million on ads that say how awsome the conservatives are and how evil the opposition is. $500,000 for mail outs, $500,000 to police forces to buy glow sticks. Problem solved.
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 01:11 PM
|
#115
|
Has lived the dream!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
"You won't recognize Canada when I'm through with it." - Stephen Harper, 2006
|
See I had read this quote before online from a very left source and I was thinking, bah! Partisan rhetoric. Who knows if it's even true? In honesty, it really doesn't add anything to the debate to trot it out like that, and I generally ignore stuff like that one both sides. Now when I see it I am saddened cause it kinda feels right.
However, a little context would still do wonders. Do you know anything about where it was spoken and why?
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 02:17 PM
|
#116
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp: 
|
Under the bill:
the advertising of others’ sexual services either in print or online will
be a criminal offence. Prostitutes can advertise their own sexual
services
What does this mean? That pimps can't advertise the service of their sex workers? Or does it mean that if your a sex worker working for yourself that you can't advertise online such as backpages or your own website?
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 02:29 PM
|
#117
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
|
There has been a ton of Conservative bashing on this thread, and I don't disagree with it. But I have yet to see anyone showing what the Liberals and NDP are proposing.
Has either party come out with an actual solution that isn't just a negative attack on the Conservatives.
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 02:41 PM
|
#118
|
Ben
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: God's Country (aka Cape Breton Island)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt
There has been a ton of Conservative bashing on this thread, and I don't disagree with it. But I have yet to see anyone showing what the Liberals and NDP are proposing.
Has either party come out with an actual solution that isn't just a negative attack on the Conservatives.
|
In fairness, I don't think anyone expected the Conservatives to go down this path. the Supreme Court just told them that they can't enact legislation that puts prostitutes at risk, so they come back with legislation that puts prostitutes at risk.
Why would the Liberals or NDP come up with a plan to counter the mind-boggling unbelievable?
__________________
"Calgary Flames is the best team in all the land" - My Brainwashed Son
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 02:54 PM
|
#119
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritime Q-Scout
In fairness, I don't think anyone expected the Conservatives to go down this path. the Supreme Court just told them that they can't enact legislation that puts prostitutes at risk, so they come back with legislation that puts prostitutes at risk.
Why would the Liberals or NDP come up with a plan to counter the mind-boggling unbelievable?
|
True, it would be unfair to expect them to have a new plan already, but have they commented at all to suggest what they would prefer? The law has been out for a week so it is plenty of time for them to come up with a constructive response.
|
|
|
06-06-2014, 03:16 PM
|
#120
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon
See I had read this quote before online from a very left source and I was thinking, bah! Partisan rhetoric. Who knows if it's even true? In honesty, it really doesn't add anything to the debate to trot it out like that, and I generally ignore stuff like that one both sides. Now when I see it I am saddened cause it kinda feels right.
However, a little context would still do wonders. Do you know anything about where it was spoken and why?
|
Not much. Can't even find which particular "US right-wing think tank" he was speaking to.
However, I feel like Harper himself is giving us the context through his actions.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 AM.
|
|