Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2014, 01:45 PM   #21
Jables16
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Jables16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
44 points actually, in 66 games-as a 19 year old. True, he is "just fine" offensively, but those aren't exactly superstar-type numbers. My point is that his play in his own end doesn't look better given those numbers. Odd that he would be rewarded with a contract so early.
I don't think anyone else is expecting a fifth round pick to have "superstar-type numbers". As you say he is obviously capable offensively which is what got him drafted in the first place and his defensive short-comings were the reason he fell to the fifth round. If he's being signed to an ELC I'd imagine Flames brass have seen enough improvement or potential in his defensive game to merit this move and I'm confident they've spent a lot more time than you or I watching him.
__________________
"If the oceans was whiskey and I was a duck, I'd swim to the bottom and never come up, but the oceans ain't whiskey, and I ain't no duck, so I'll play the Jack of Diamonds and toast to my luck..."
Jables16 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jables16 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2014, 01:47 PM   #22
Monahan23
Scoring Winger
 
Monahan23's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Exp:
Default

I'm upset they signed Roy, he has all kinds of problems in his own end and should've waited a year to see weather we wan to waste a contract on him for 3 years. He could turn out to be something really special. But I doubt it.

I hope Gordon gets a shot somewhere else
Monahan23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 01:48 PM   #23
Fransken
Farm Team Player
 
Fransken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sweden
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman View Post
44 points actually, in 66 games-as a 19 year old. True, he is "just fine" offensively, but those aren't exactly superstar-type numbers. My point is that his play in his own end doesn't look better given those numbers. Odd that he would be rewarded with a contract so early.
He's a fifth round pick, no one is expecting him to perform at superstar level in any way a year after the draft
Fransken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 01:48 PM   #24
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

So... is he 'Roy' as in Patrick Roy, or 'Roy' as in Derek Roy?
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2014, 01:50 PM   #25
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
So... is he 'Roy' as in Patrick Roy, or 'Roy' as in Derek Roy?
English Roy. Not Francophone Roy.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2014, 01:50 PM   #26
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
So... is he 'Roy' as in Patrick Roy, or 'Roy' as in Derek Roy?
The latter.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 01:54 PM   #27
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahan23 View Post
I'm upset they signed Roy
they didn't sign him, they just offered him a contract (probably league minimum ELC). If they didn't, they would have lost his rights. See getbaks post on the first page.

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenWHaynes
Same thing happened last year with Coda Gordon, Flames made offer by June 1 to maintain rights. He rejected the offer but never got another.

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenWHaynes
Last year, Gordon, Culkin and Kulak as 2012 picks all got bonafide offers by June 1. Each rejected it. Only Culkin/Kulak got another offer.

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenWHaynes
Often players such as Coda Gordon will reject the initial offer for league minimum, hoping a better contract will come. This time it didn't.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2014, 01:56 PM   #28
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
they didn't sign him, they just offered him a contract (probably league minimum ELC). If they didn't, they would have lost his rights. See getbaks post on the first page.

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenWHaynes
Same thing happened last year with Coda Gordon, Flames made offer by June 1 to maintain rights. He rejected the offer but never got another.

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenWHaynes
Last year, Gordon, Culkin and Kulak as 2012 picks all got bonafide offers by June 1. Each rejected it. Only Culkin/Kulak got another offer.

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenWHaynes
Often players such as Coda Gordon will reject the initial offer for league minimum, hoping a better contract will come. This time it didn't.
Can't imagine what kind of bozo agent would tell a 6th round draft pick to reject ANY contract offer.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2014, 02:00 PM   #29
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway View Post
Odd that the team's (a) offering him a deal now and (b) announcing it.
I agree, very odd that they announced it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
He's not signed yet. This is simply a condition of the CBA to retain draft rights to a player from major junior (it's been in the CBA since at least 2005, but I don't recall teams ever announcing it).

Quote:
8.6 Reserve List-Exclusive Rights.

(a) Commencing with the 2013 Entry Draft, a Player selected by a Club in the Entry Draft shall be registered on the Reserve List of the selecting Club as an "Unsigned Draft Choice."
(i) Subject to the provisions of Sections (b), (c), (d) and (e) below, such registration shall establish for such selecting Club the exclusive right of negotiation for the services of each Player selected and registered as against all other Clubs up to and including June 1 of the next calendar year following the date of his selection.

(ii) Subject to the provisions of subsection (iii) below and Sections (b), (c) and (d) below, if, on or before June 1 of the calendar year next succeeding the Entry Draft, the claiming Club makes a Bona Fide Offer (as defined below) to its claimed Player of an SPC, the Club shall retain the exclusive right of negotiation for the services of such Player up to and including the second June 1 following the date of his selection.
If they had not made a bona fide offer, he would have been removed from the Flames' reserve list.


Roy was the only player drafted last year who they were required to give a bona fide offer. Monahan, Poirier, Klimchuk, and Kanzig are already signed. Harrison and Gilmour are College students, and Rafikov is a European player so the three of them didn't require a bona fide offer to remain Flames property.


The offer is likely a bare minimum ELC, so he might not want to sign it. If he doesn't sign it, he'll still remain Flames property until June 1, 2015.
That is a new provision in the CBA, as shown by the line "Commencing with the 2013 Entry Draft".

If the Flames had not made an offer would have he re-entered the draft? Or would have he become a UFA? Because it just states we would have lost exclusive negotiating rights.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 02:21 PM   #30
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
That is a new provision in the CBA, as shown by the line "Commencing with the 2013 Entry Draft".
The 2005 CBA said the same thing (it said "2005", but otherwise the wording is exactly the same).

The only change I could see is that European players are now a team's property for 4 years without requiring a bona fide offer after one year.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2014, 02:22 PM   #31
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

So just because they offered a contract, he can stay Flames property for another year even if he refuses the offer?

Thanks for the article PMM, I feel a lot better about Roy knowing he's working hard to improve, and the coaches he's working with now are just the ones to do it.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2014, 02:29 PM   #32
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
So just because they offered a contract, he can stay Flames property for another year even if he refuses the offer?
Yup. It's just like when teams give a pending RFA the required qualifying offer to maintain his RFA status. Very few players actually accept the QO because it is a bare-minimum offer, and they know they can usually negotiate a better deal with the team.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2014, 02:30 PM   #33
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahan23 View Post
I'm upset they signed Roy, he has all kinds of problems in his own end and should've waited a year to see weather we wan to waste a contract on him for 3 years. He could turn out to be something really special. But I doubt it.

I hope Gordon gets a shot somewhere else
As I recall TJ Brodie was good offensively in junior but suspect defensively. Look how he turned out after a few years. I think it is easier to teach a defenseman in how to play defensively hockey than teaching them offensively. So I am very confident that if Eric Roy is willing to listen and learn, he'll be an average or more than average two-way defenseman. A few seasons in AHL will prepare him for the NHL.
OzSome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 02:37 PM   #34
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzSome View Post
As I recall TJ Brodie was good offensively in junior but suspect defensively. Look how he turned out after a few years. I think it is easier to teach a defenseman in how to play defensively hockey than teaching them offensively. So I am very confident that if Eric Roy is willing to listen and learn, he'll be an average or more than average two-way defenseman. A few seasons in AHL will prepare him for the NHL.
That and our less than stellar defensive prospect pool mandates that we have to work with our picks to see if they can develop into nhl quality.

Still shaking my head why we didn't pick Ebert instead of Gordon. Could shoulda woulda.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 02:54 PM   #35
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
Can't imagine what kind of bozo agent would tell a 6th round draft pick to reject ANY contract offer.

That is a head scratcher for me as well.

Only thing would be if the 2 way contract offer was less than what the guy would make in Europe or the ECHL.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 02:58 PM   #36
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
The 2005 CBA said the same thing (it said "2005", but otherwise the wording is exactly the same).

The only change I could see is that European players are now a team's property for 4 years without requiring a bona fide offer after one year.
I guess with the change involving euros in the provision it would technically commence with the 2013 draft.

Also I always thought Bona Fide was 1 word, it seems like I am getting schooled today
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 03:23 PM   #37
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fransken View Post
He's a fifth round pick, no one is expecting him to perform at superstar level in any way a year after the draft
Obviously guys, nobody is expecting a superstar-this is just a sarcastic way of illustrating my thoughts about his numbers being less than stellar for a guy with perceived defensive issues. I shouldn't have to explain that.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 03:32 PM   #38
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson View Post
That is a head scratcher for me as well.

Only thing would be if the 2 way contract offer was less than what the guy would make in Europe or the ECHL.
Most likely the offer was $35k/yr (lowest allowed by the CBA) in the AHL and no signing bonus.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 04:52 PM   #39
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Glencross
Hudler
Bouma
Gaudreau
Baertschi
Byron
Reinhart
Van Brabant
Ferland
Klimchuk
Agostino
Wolf

Is it worth offering a contract to a player who wouldn't even crack your top 10 or 12 depth chart at his position?

Good luck to him anyway.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 05:05 PM   #40
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
Glencross
Hudler
Bouma
Gaudreau
Baertschi
Byron
Reinhart
Van Brabant
Ferland
Klimchuk
Agostino
Wolf

Is it worth offering a contract to a player who wouldn't even crack your top 10 or 12 depth chart at his position?

Good luck to him anyway.
Roy is a d-man

Edit: Oh you were talking about Gordon. Forgot the thread was about both, my bad

Last edited by btimbit; 06-01-2014 at 05:05 PM. Reason: edit
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy