Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-17-2014, 01:55 PM   #761
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerio View Post
What do you guys think of this theory?

http://keithledgerwood.tumblr.com/po...ing-sia68-sq68
Some insight on this theory from an ATC guy up in Edmonton that controls traffic into/out of Calgary:

"Again, that would all depend on the aircraft's proximity to the primary radar source. As refueling aircraft wih F-16's or F-15's pass near YYC source, we can actually easily see the fighter's primary returns. The tanker is the only one squawking during altitude reservation flights such as these. Now, a target the size of a 777 has a pretty significant cross section and would be easily detectable from quite a range. The SIA68 flight would be sending an ambiguous return for the time they were "coupled". Wicked piloting skills if he could tail the other 777 without anyone knowing. James Bond sh*t right there. At least it's one of the more entertaining theories that's been pitched in a while."
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 01:56 PM   #762
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

^ that plus the original reddit theory on it said there was a distance between them of like 30 miles. If a radar operator can't see two 777's 30 miles apart because they're on the same flight path, I don't think I want them being a radar operator.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 01:59 PM   #763
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut View Post
This is where I'm at with it. I don't see why there would be "deliberate action" to turn off the transponder and ACARS and go on a new flight path for 4+ hours only to crash into the Indian Ocean. It must have landed somewhere?! (I think, anyways)

But I also think there is about 0% chance any of the passengers are still alive.
Ya, I keep coming back to why would someone land a plane in a country, and not tell anyone why? Like why would you hijack and not release any information at all, kind of defeats the agenda you are trying to push. Unless they are buying time to hide the plane and passengers, and demands will be released when they are ready. Although they must know the US and the world would come down on them and whoever they support hard.

My thought is that it was hijacked, by a passenger or pilot, it was then flown over the ocean, and crashed due to lack of fuel or a struggle. That in itself is bizarre but it is all I can think of given the lack of info at this point.
OldDutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 03:35 PM   #764
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
^ that plus the original reddit theory on it said there was a distance between them of like 30 miles. If a radar operator can't see two 777's 30 miles apart because they're on the same flight path, I don't think I want them being a radar operator.
It's very common to have echo on primary radar from a good enough distance, if both planes aren't using transponders it can look like one airplane.

30 miles seems far though, If I was going to shadow another plane to avoid radar it would be .5 a km behind and 500 ft higher.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 03:37 PM   #765
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

500 meters would seem way too close for a plane traveling 600 miles an hour.
puckluck2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 03:39 PM   #766
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

I'd do this

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 03-17-2014, 03:50 PM   #767
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2 View Post
500 meters would seem way too close for a plane traveling 600 miles an hour.
If you want to hide behind it you need to be close, as long as your above it and out of it's wash it would be doable. It's not like the thing can jam on the brakes and you could rearend it.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 03:53 PM   #768
Acey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yeah you'll want to be above to avoid the wake, and maybe kill the strobes or you'll be made... if there's any cloud. Cruise speed is fast, but modern autopilots will show very little deviation so it's relatively safe.

Last edited by Acey; 03-17-2014 at 03:55 PM. Reason: .
Acey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 03:59 PM   #769
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey View Post
Yeah you'll want to be above to avoid the wake, and maybe kill the strobes or you'll be made... if there's any cloud. Cruise speed is fast, but modern autopilots will show very little deviation so it's relatively safe.
Big rear view mirrors?
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 04:01 PM   #770
Acey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Could potentially reflect off cloud. Beacon should be alright.
Acey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 05:27 PM   #771
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDutch View Post
Ya, I keep coming back to why would someone land a plane in a country, and not tell anyone why? Like why would you hijack and not release any information at all, kind of defeats the agenda you are trying to push. Unless they are buying time to hide the plane and passengers, and demands will be released when they are ready. Although they must know the US and the world would come down on them and whoever they support hard.

My thought is that it was hijacked, by a passenger or pilot, it was then flown over the ocean, and crashed due to lack of fuel or a struggle. That in itself is bizarre but it is all I can think of given the lack of info at this point.
If its landed and thats a big if, why do you think its weird we havent heard anything. What if they asked the Chinese govt for a ransom and they are negotiating. Would China really release that information?
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 05:38 PM   #772
JonDuke
Franchise Player
 
JonDuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDutch View Post
Ya, I keep coming back to why would someone land a plane in a country, and not tell anyone why? Like why would you hijack and not release any information at all, kind of defeats the agenda you are trying to push. Unless they are buying time to hide the plane and passengers, and demands will be released when they are ready. Although they must know the US and the world would come down on them and whoever they support hard.

My thought is that it was hijacked, by a passenger or pilot, it was then flown over the ocean, and crashed due to lack of fuel or a struggle. That in itself is bizarre but it is all I can think of given the lack of info at this point.
Or what if they stole the plane for someone or something in board. They land it, take what or who they want, and dispose (I hate to use that term for a human life) of the rest.

Maybe in this case, releasing info is not what is intended and instead something will come of it later when those looking least expect it. And I don't mean using the airplane later for an attack as I don't believe that will happen.
JonDuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 05:42 PM   #773
jschick88
Franchise Player
 
jschick88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Flying Kangaroo ‏@FlynKangaroo 8m
#MH370 search: US Navy wil base P3 Orion at Phuket, Thailand, P8 at Perth, #Australia. USS Kidd to end search
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29 View Post
Dude when it comes to the Canucks, it could be a team of Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, Augusto Pinochet, Josef Stalin and Kim Jong Il and if one of them scores against the Canucks you take it.
jschick88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 05:44 PM   #774
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Is that an indication that they don't believe it went south?

edit: no, just focusing on plane searches

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...laysian-plane/
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 07:35 PM   #775
jschick88
Franchise Player
 
jschick88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
The first turn to the west that diverted the missing Malaysia Airlines plane from its planned flight path from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing was carried out through a computer system that was most likely programmed by someone in the plane’s cockpit who was knowledgeable about airplane systems, according to senior American officials.

Instead of manually operating the plane’s controls, whoever altered Flight 370’s path typed seven or eight keystrokes into a computer on a knee-high pedestal between the captain and the first officer, according to officials. The Flight Management System, as the computer is known, directs the plane from point to point specified in the flight plan submitted before each flight. It is not clear whether the plane’s path was reprogrammed before or after it took off.

The fact that the turn away from Beijing was programmed into the computer has reinforced the belief of investigators — first voiced by Malaysian officials — that the plane was deliberately diverted and that foul play was involved. It has also increased their focus on the plane’s captain and first officer.

But Malaysian authorities on Monday reversed themselves on the sequence of events they believe took place on the plane in the crucial minutes before ground controllers lost contact with it early on March 8. They said it was the plane’s first officer — the co-pilot — who was the last person in the cockpit to speak to ground control. And they withdrew their assertion that another automated system on the plane called Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, or Acars, had already been disabled when the co-pilot spoke.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/wo...=tw-share&_r=0
jschick88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 09:04 PM   #776
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

^
Has anything any "Malaysian authorities" said in the past 10 days not been reversed, debunked, rebuked or flat out ignored, within hours or days after being said?
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 09:19 PM   #777
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
^
Has anything any "Malaysian authorities" said in the past 10 days not been reversed, debunked, rebuked or flat out ignored, within hours or days after being said?
Flight 370 is missing?
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 10:32 PM   #778
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
If its landed and thats a big if, why do you think its weird we havent heard anything. What if they asked the Chinese govt for a ransom and they are negotiating. Would China really release that information?
Wow now that is a conspiracy theory. So the Chinese gov't is secretly negotiating while keeping the general public and/or the other gov'ts that have passengers on board in the dark. So when they are successful they will tell us the whole story...and that won't turn the world against the Chinese?

I get they tried to cover up just about everything including SARS, but I think that is a stretch. I just can't believe there is a secret negotiation happening. I just think the collective WTF from the world would cause a lot a chaos, and anger towards the Chinese for pulling that stunt.

I won't say you are wrong, as who knows at this point, but I think there is way more chance something went wrong in the hijack and it crashed in the ocean, than a secret negotiation and the world being strung along.

EDIT: Here is an article I read just after I posted this: http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/mis...-landed-n54896

Last edited by OldDutch; 03-17-2014 at 10:39 PM.
OldDutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 11:11 PM   #779
Acey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

My current belief is that this aircraft is never found.
Acey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 11:17 PM   #780
kermitology
It's not easy being green!
 
kermitology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...A2G10320140317

Quote:
A commander with the Pakistani Taliban, a separate entity fighting the Pakistani government, said the fragmented group could only dream about such an operation.

"We wish we had an opportunity to hijack such a plane," he told Reuters by telephone from the lawless North Waziristan region.
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
kermitology is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy