02-25-2014, 08:32 PM
|
#1601
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Jankowski.
|
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to saXon For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-26-2014, 07:44 AM
|
#1602
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thymebalm
I've got to imagine that's a strength thing. You get the skill down in junior/college, but then you have to develop the strength to win those draws against NHLers.
|
Young players always seem to suck at faceoffs. If you look at the rookie list for face-offs - virtually all of them are below 50%
http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats.h...fPercentageAll
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-26-2014, 11:25 AM
|
#1603
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
|
At least Monahan is beating Lindholm 
Anyways back to Janko, heard he needs to do some beefing up. 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2014, 11:29 AM
|
#1604
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI
At least Monahan is beating Lindholm
Anyways back to Janko, heard he needs to do some beefing up. |
Add Colborne to the list of players that need to beef up. Dude is a twig. He definitely skips leg day with chicken legs like that.
|
|
|
|
|
02-26-2014, 02:06 PM
|
#1605
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
|
Agreed.. Especially since he seems to be trying to play more physical lately.. He might surprise us next year. I'm hopeful.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 11:33 AM
|
#1606
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Jankowski and the Friars wrapped up their regular season yesterday with a win and sealed 3rd in the Hockey East conference and a first round bye.
Because Jankowski missed a few games last season with a minor injury he has matched his games played totals from last year which is 34 games, so we are at a point where we can easily compare his stats between last year and this year.
Devo posted this in the stats thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
Jankowski 2012-13: 5th in points, 6th in goals, scored 6.7 % of the Friars' goals, was involved in 17.1 % of the Friars' goals
Jankowski 2013-14: 3rd in points, 2nd in goals, scored 10.8 % of the Friars' goals, was involved in 21.6 % of the Friars' goals
|
In addition to those numbers Jankowski raised his goal total from 7 to 11, a 57.1% increase so far.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Alberta_Beef For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 03:25 PM
|
#1607
|
|
Franchise Player
|
So I guess it's time to ask.
Any chance Jankowski turns pro now? Can he play at the AHL level?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 03:26 PM
|
#1608
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
no chance if you ask me. Definitely going back for at least another year ... still needs to bulk up and improve in various areas
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 06:20 PM
|
#1609
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias
So I guess it's time to ask.
Any chance Jankowski turns pro now? Can he play at the AHL level?
|
Nah. I imagine he will be in college four years.
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 06:40 PM
|
#1610
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Definitely another year of college, but it's too early to assume a 4th year.
If he bulks up and progresses, I could see turning pro after next season. It's also pretty easy to finish the degree if you get 3 years in.
But of course, that all depends on his progression
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 07:08 PM
|
#1611
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
My guess is that Gillies and Jankowski return to college for one more year.
With Gaudreau likely going pro along with Arnold and Hayes, Boston College could regress a bit next year, while Providence's young team will be one year older and will have a good chance at winning Hockey East and doing well in the NCAA tournament.
After that, I could see them both turning pro after next season.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-02-2014, 07:09 PM
|
#1612
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I think there is very little chance Jankowski turns pro this summer. He will put in his junior year and try to take the #1 centre role from Mauermann while continuing to be a key faceoff and defensive player for the Friars.
|
|
|
|
|
03-05-2014, 06:48 PM
|
#1614
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
|
I am so gonna be the guy that wins in 16 years 
|
|
|
|
|
03-12-2014, 06:35 PM
|
#1615
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef
Jankowski and the Friars wrapped up their regular season yesterday with a win and sealed 3rd in the Hockey East conference and a first round bye.
Because Jankowski missed a few games last season with a minor injury he has matched his games played totals from last year which is 34 games, so we are at a point where we can easily compare his stats between last year and this year.
Devo posted this in the stats thread:
In addition to those numbers Jankowski raised his goal total from 7 to 11, a 57.1% increase so far.
|
I will be impressed if he can translate that path to 17-20 goals next year. There's really no reason he shouldn't based on how likely it is that providence will be one of the top teams.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 03-12-2014 at 06:43 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
03-12-2014, 06:43 PM
|
#1616
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Definitely another year of college, but it's too early to assume a 4th year.
If he bulks up and progresses, I could see turning pro after next season. It's also pretty easy to finish the degree if you get 3 years in.
But of course, that all depends on his progression
|
I don't think its necessarily up to Jankowski compared to guys that are clearly above their competition in the NCAA like Gaudreau, Arnold and Gillies.
If the Flames aren't overly impressed with his development as a first round pick, they surely won't be trying to bring him up from college early. Not saying they are or are not but I can't see them in an hurry to bring someone up that can easily benefit from lower competition in the NCAA compared to pro for a few more years.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
|
|
03-12-2014, 07:06 PM
|
#1617
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
I don't think its necessarily up to Jankowski compared to guys that are clearly above their competition in the NCAA like Gaudreau, Arnold and Gillies.
If the Flames aren't overly impressed with his development as a first round pick, they surely won't be trying to bring him up from college early. Not saying they are or are not but I can't see them in an hurry to bring someone up that can easily benefit from lower competition in the NCAA compared to pro for a few more years.
|
Oh I totally agree. IF he bulks up and is able to be dominant, then he could get a contract after next season. But that is a big if.
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 08:40 AM
|
#1618
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Oh I totally agree. IF he bulks up and is able to be dominant, then he could get a contract after next season. But that is a big if.
|
If he bulks up? Jankowski is 6'3 186 pounds. Monahan is 6'2 185 pounds. A my kid at 19 is going to see a weight gain, so I don't get all the concern over Jankowski's weight. Can't wait to see him at development camp in July so people will see the growth in his game and his stature first hand.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 10:30 AM
|
#1619
|
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
If he bulks up? Jankowski is 6'3 186 pounds. Monahan is 6'2 185 pounds. A my kid at 19 is going to see a weight gain, so I don't get all the concern over Jankowski's weight. Can't wait to see him at development camp in July so people will see the growth in his game and his stature first hand.
|
Not disagreeing, but curious where you got those numbers from?
Hockeydb shows:
Monahan @ 6'2'', 187 lbs
Jankowski @ 6'3'', 175 lbs
|
|
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 10:32 AM
|
#1620
|
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
Not disagreeing, but curious where you got those numbers from?
Hockeydb shows:
Monahan @ 6'2'', 187 lbs
Jankowski @ 6'3'', 175 lbs
|
And if he still is 175 lbs, he's got a lot of bulking up to do.
When I was 19 I was 5'' shorter than Jankowski, but same weight. And no I wasn't chubby.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 PM.
|
|
