Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2014, 09:28 AM   #21
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

lol I'd love to see them give up assets to get Gilbert from the Panthers lol. I'm so happy he's doing well now that he's gone.

Stupid Oilers.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:29 AM   #22
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Weird move, Fraser is a UFA and has a 1.2 million dollar cap hit. So they traded a prospect and a nothing player for a really bad defensemen and added to their Free agent woes.

I'm beginning to think that Mac-T got his MBA from DeVry

This is a move that makes little to no sense, and I would class it as busywork
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2014, 09:30 AM   #23
D-Red
Farm Team Player
 
D-Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Cap geek suggesting it's to clear cap space to get Bolland off the LTIR
D-Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:30 AM   #24
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
This is a move that makes little to no sense, and I would class it as busywork
well at least he's consistent!
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:31 AM   #25
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Minor move but not a bad trade for the oilers. A reverse smid deal but for a pending UFA who doesnt and wont make any dough.

Fraser will be a whole lot better than Larsson or Albert or whoever the heck they have playing D these days.
Bend it like Bourgeois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:32 AM   #26
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

They keep on adding UFAs. Either they think they are going for a playoff push or after playing there for a few months, these guys will have a change of heart and love the city and sign there long-term.

Have they found his girlfriend/wife yet and called her a lazy gold-digger?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:33 AM   #27
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This sounds like a great trade:

Mark Masters@markhmasters12 mins

Mark Fraser had been a healthy scratch in 20 of Leafs last 22 games; last played Jan. 9 in Carolina

Bob Stauffer@Bob_Stauffer15 mins

Fraser played parts of two seasons for Dallas Eakins with the Marlies. Will get a chance as a 3rd pairing guy 10-14 mins per game
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MissTeeks For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2014, 09:35 AM   #28
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Isn't Fraser the guy who got his skull cracked by a puck awhile ago. There were cat scan photos going around?
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:35 AM   #29
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bend it like Bourgeois View Post
Minor move but not a bad trade for the oilers. A reverse smid deal but for a pending UFA who doesnt and wont make any dough.

Fraser will be a whole lot better than Larsson or Albert or whoever the heck they have playing D these days.
They fricken wish that they had Albert, if they had him then they would be something special up there.



CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2014, 09:37 AM   #30
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTeeks View Post
Bob Stauffer@Bob_Stauffer15 mins

Fraser played parts of two seasons for Dallas Eakins with the Marlies. Will get a chance as a 3rd pairing guy 10-14 mins per game
wait wait wait....I get it, they are building an AHL team up there....
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:38 AM   #31
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

I actually kind of like Hartikainen a little. Not a lot but Rights to Hartikainen for what I consider to be a negative value asset... clear win for T.O. I wonder if Burke could have offered up O'Brien at half price and gotten that return.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2014, 09:41 AM   #32
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Looks at Edmonton Sun Crossword puzzle

Hey guys is functionally ######ed a word?
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:44 AM   #33
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
I actually kind of like Hartikainen a little. Not a lot but Rights to Hartikainen for what I consider to be a negative value asset... clear win for T.O. I wonder if Burke could have offered up O'Brien at half price and gotten that return.
Hartikainen was pretty hyped up by the Oilers fan base for a while there, but he had seriously dropped down their depth chart. He's probably never going to pull on Leaf or Marlie's silks.

This is a trade that more benefits Toronto then Edmonton in the long term. In the short term, maybe Fraser can come in and play a quality 14 minutes a . . .

CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:44 AM   #34
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Fraser sucks, but oddly this makes the Oilers D better. Not by a lot, but it could not have gotten any worse.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:46 AM   #35
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Hartikainen? I thought Oilers fans were certain he was going to be a player?
The writing was on the wall when he left for the KHL.

He's wasn't going to play for Edmonton.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:48 AM   #36
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Well something for nothing is always a good thing, but here it's really nothing for nothing. 5/6 D man who is a UFA? I don't see the value. Especially since half the Oilers D corp is 5/6 guys
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:49 AM   #37
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Hartikainen was pretty hyped up by the Oilers fan base for a while there, but he had seriously dropped down their depth chart. He's probably never going to pull on Leaf or Marlie's silks.
Meh. Whenever we faced the Oiler with him in the line-up he always seemed to have some of the "I actually give a damn" that the rest of his team lacked. I never bought the Oiler fan hype but he looked like a guy that could grind out a living in the league. Not a top 6 guy (not enough natural talent) but I thought he had the stuff to play in a teams bottom six.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2014, 09:49 AM   #38
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
For a guy that came in and announced that he was ready to make bold moves he sure has made a lot of very small moves to go with his "0.0" bold moves.
I dunno about that. Standing in the train tracks and just eating another lottery season without doing anything to address it is pretty bold in its own way.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:52 AM   #39
Scoutski
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Scoutski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Exp:
Default

I think I'm alone here, but I actually kind of think the oilers didn't make a terrible move.

The two guys they moved out were very fringe players and I doubt they ever get much/if any NHL time. Maybe Hartikainen develops into a solid 2-way kind of guy and comes in, but it's still better for the oilers to add some older more experienced guys for the moment.

The guy they get back fits their needs and has decent NHL experience (~150+ games). I'm not saying he's an incredible defenceman but they got a guy who can and likely will play for them, giving up assets they had all but given up on and it improves their team. Please don't come back with hyperbole but their team is better than it was before the trade.
Scoutski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 09:56 AM   #40
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scoutski View Post
I think I'm alone here, but I actually kind of think the oilers didn't make a terrible move.

The two guys they moved out were very fringe players and I doubt they ever get much/if any NHL time. Maybe Hartikainen develops into a solid 2-way kind of guy and comes in, but it's still better for the oilers to add some older more experienced guys for the moment.

The guy they get back fits their needs and has decent NHL experience (~150+ games). I'm not saying he's an incredible defenceman but they got a guy who can and likely will play for them, giving up assets they had all but given up on and it improves their team. Please don't come back with hyperbole but their team is better than it was before the trade.
Yeah.. its not bad for the Oilers but really doesn't move the needle in any direction. Just more fiddling around to look busy.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy